Hmmm, This didn't seem to make it into the news either? Wow, What is going on out there that we are being held from? My wife says I have become a "Conspiracy theorist" and that I need to remove my "tin Hat." I get that from people from time to time but I remember not to long ago, people laughed at the idea of a new or one world order or that America was headed straight for Socialism, or that America was on the verge of socio and political-economic collapse and so on.
What do we see now? The move toward Socialism, the movement toward a one world order and the collapse of our political system, our society and our economy. Repeat something long enough whether it be true or fiction, good or bad and the people will become numb and accept anything.
Conspiracy theory? How about "Keep the American people in the dark and keep em busy with deaths of rock stars and hollywood idols and similar trivialities( Death is never trivial only compared to this countries present issues) until the crap hits the fan and they will never know what hit em"
Here is another example.
HOMELAND INSECURITY Mexican agents headed for U.S.?
Federal drill to focus on response to terrorPosted: July 18, 200912:25 am EasternBy Bob Unruh© 2009
Agents for Mexico soon could be roaming the roads of several southern states - along with representatives of Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom - under a Federal Emergency Management Agency exercise that is going to focus "exclusively on terrorism prevention and protection.
"The event is called National Level Exercise 2009 and is part of an annual series of exercises formerly called TOPOFF, for Top Officials, under the National Exercise Program that "serves as the nation's overarching exercise program for planning, organizing, conducting and evaluating national level exercises."
The idea has some bloggers stunned."Imagine, armed Mexican troops protecting us from 'terrorism' in the United States! Don't you feel safer already? ¿Dónde están sus documentos?" wrote an alarmed blogger at TargetFreedom."Rumors of foreign troops on our soil have been circulated for a long time. BUT this is not a rumor. It is a blatant fact as stated by FEMA on their government website.
THIS IS AN INVASION," the blogger wrote.Proclaim your beliefs loudly. Get your "Legalize the Constitution" bumper sticker!Not quite, the government said. In an announcement on the FEMA website, officials described it as a "White House directed, congressionally-mandated exercise that includes the participation of all appropriate federal department and agency senior officials, their deputies, staff and key operational elements."
Oh, yes, various "state, tribal, local, and private sector" interests will participate and "this year the United States welcomes the participation of Australia, Canada, Mexico and the United Kingdom in NLE 09."The government's announcement said the exercise will focus on "intelligence and information sharing among intelligence and law enforcement communities.
"The scenario "will begin in the aftermath of a national terrorist event outside of the United States, and exercise play will center on preventing subsequent efforts by the terrorists to enter the United States and carry out additional attacks. This scenario enables participating senior officials to focus on issues related to preventing terrorist events domestically and protecting U.S. critical infrastructure."
The exercise will "allow terrorism prevention efforts to proceed to a logical end (successful or not), with no requirement for response or recovery activities," the government said.FEMA Region VI, including the states of Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico and Texas, will be the field of operations for the exercise starting July 27 to test intelligence collection and sharing, counterterrorism investigation, security, infrastructure protection and other facets.
During a previous similar exercise, WND reported that Gen. Victor E. Renuart, the commander of USNORTHCOM, confirmed he would deploy U.S. troops on American soil if the president declared a domestic emergency.USNORTHCOM, which was established in 2002 with a responsibility for "homeland defense" of an area including U.S. Canada, Mexico and parts of the Caribbean, would be ready to come to the aid of law enforcement agencies or National Guard units if needed, officials confirmed.
When another terror drill, involving the detonation of a "nuclear" device, was conducted, media outlets funded by billionaire George Soros were warning it may be a "false flag" operation that would involve the detonation of a real bomb to set the stage for martial law.The 2007 drill was in Portland, Ore., and brought together federal, state and local efforts.
At the time, Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, suggested then, "Maybe the people who think there's a conspiracy out there are right."But many have not yet forgotten that the same government running the exercise only weeks ago described ordinary protesters in the U.S. as "low-level" terror suspects.The U.S. Department of Defense had included in a training course a question that defined protesters as terrorists.
According to the letter from the Northern California ACLU, the DoD's "Annual Level 1 Antiterrorism (AT) Awareness Training for 2009" tells department personnel "that certain First Amendment-protected activity may amount to 'low-level terrorism.'"Specifically the training "Knowledge Check 1" asks, "Which of the following is an example of low-level terrorism activity?"The multiple choices are: Attacking the Pentagon, IEDs, Hate crimes against racial groups and Protests.The correct answer in the training course is "Protests."
Are you ready for a second Declaration of Independence? Sign the petition promoting true freedom once again!The Pentagon later withdrew the question."They should have made it clearer," Pentagon spokesman Lt. Col. Les Melnyk told Fox. He declined to specify when the line would be crossed from one into the other.But he said all of the 1,546 people who took the exam and saw the question will be notified of the "error" and told that there is a difference between lawful objections and violent unrest.
The whole episode developed just weeks after a scandal erupted over a Department of Homeland Security report that described as "right-wing extremists" those who oppose abortion and support secure national borders.Richard Thompson, president of the Thomas More Law Center, said his organization sued over the DHS "extremism" report.
The DHS report was "Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment." WND has posted the report online for readers to see.The report linked returning veterans with the possibility of terrorism, and when it was released it created such a furor for Napolitano she has given several explanations for it, including that she would have reworded the report and that it was issued by a rogue employee.
She later apologized to veterans for having linked them to terror.But Thompson noted that the report also targeted as "potential terrorists" Americans who:Oppose abortionOppose same-sex marriageOppose restrictions on firearmsOppose lax immigration lawsOppose the policies of President Obama regarding immigration, citizenship, and the expansion of social programsOppose continuation of free trade agreementsAre suspect of foreign regimesFear Communist regimesOppose a "one world" government Bemoan the decline of U.S. stature in the world. Are upset with loss of U.S. manufacturing jobs to China and India, and moreThompson told WND no apology has been offered to the members of any of those classes of citizens.Thompson said the original "extremism" report was "the tip of the iceberg. … Conservative Americans should be very outraged."
Is anyone putting this together yet? We have now become the target of the very people whom we voted into office.
The patriotic, white, Christian, conservative American who opposes the "new world agenda" is now the target and has become the new face of terrorism without firing a shot, without blowing up buildings,strapping bombs to our children, without even as much as an loud disagreement to be heard.
I am criminalized all while waking up every morning, going to work 9-5, coming home to the family five days a week only to have a few hours every night in my own home enjoying our time without disrupting others around me?While obeying the laws no matter how unconstitutitonal they may be, paying taxes without proper taxation without representation and the extreme overreach of government into every aspect of our lives...then they want to consider martial law?
I am a terrorist because I prefer to have a child rather than to kill it?
I am a terrorist because I enjoy the rights whom were given to me by God and guaranteed by the Constitution which is still, at this moment, the law of the land.
I am a terrorist because I do not believe in same sex , restrictions on firearms.
I Oppose lax immigration laws, Oppose the policies of President Obama regarding immigration, citizenship, and the expansion of social programs.
Oppose continuation of free trade agreements, I am suspect of foreign regimes, I Fear Communist regimes and
I Oppose a "one world" government and Bemoan the decline of U.S. stature in the world?
Who has taken over this country, the Communists?
It was once respectable and honorable to have the traits I possess now I am a crimminal in my own country even though some present laws still allow me some of these freedoms?
The pathetic part is most Americans either did not see it coming or welcomed the change.
Remember those of you who voted for "Change" here it is and I hope you like it because if things continue the way they have it will be irreversible if you "change" your mind.