Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Response to Alisson on "letter to Oathtakers"

In a previous post I wrote an open "letter to Oathtakers" and this is the only comment thus far and of course, comes with my response to the comment. I pray he is law enforcement to open dialogue and destroy the wedge between law enforcement and its citizens and to learn the truth of what has happened to our country, our laws, our history and the common sense in this country!

A response to my letter to Oath takers

I just want to say something to the ppeloe who keep saying the government shouldnt regulate responsibility and individuals should be responsible for their own actions . If some guy came into a mall waving a loaded gun around and acting piss drunk, should the police just say “oh well he should have been responsible for himself” and not do anything about it? NO. When you get behind the wheel after drinking, you are gaining control of a LETHAL WEAPON with limited inhibitions and lowered reaction time. The level is set there because that is where the government thinks a person is no longer reasonably able to control their own vehicle, where the reaction time slows on an average person. Like others have said, if you are driving erratically and blow something lower than a .08, you will still be held responsible. If it is set at .00, many ppeloe who are fully functioning could be cited at traffic stops where they test everyone. They put it at a limit so they can catch those who are actually inhibited. And this has nothing to do with prohibition or personal responsibility. If it were up to me, anyone given a DUI would automatically get a suspended license.

To Alisson  Almeida:

Dear Alisson,

Ah, finally a reader that comments and what great questions and concerns you have, thank you! I hope you will take the time to read my responses to them as they are important in how we look at law today and the way they were originally supposed to. You sound like a cop, are you? If you are I am extremely glad you read my letter and had the guts to comment in a public forum, You have my respect!

First, if I see it correctly, you are bothered by my comments. I am sorry for this but maybe I can help clarify my position.

Second, you are not the only one to get frustrated at comments I have made but for the most part in the past it has been either ignorance of the law that causes this or peoples refusal to see what bad shape we are in in this country and their only answer they can come up with is that we need more government to fix the ills of society.

If you love this country, why? If you love this country for the freedom we have, how do you think we have been so free and what has kept us that way?

As a passionate historian and lover of both American History and Constitutional, Biblical and common law, I can tell you that first of all this country was founded as an experiment in SELF-GOVERNMENT, meaning you took personal responsibility for your own actions and were punished for wrong doing, which was the purpose of law not to preemptively save ourselves from each other from our stupidity!

This country was founded my men that broke the chains of tyranny from Great Britain where the King ruled with Feudalism, you were only entitled to the rights he gave you, maybe in trade for something else, The King was the Tyrant ruler, read the Declaration of Independence!

These men sick of being told everything they could and couldn't do, wanted freedom from this tyranny and came to America. When they came here they brought with them great wisdom and ability that I believe was the marvel of the world.

These men were astute and avid readers with great knowledge in history, law both English law and Biblical law and so much more. With this knowledge and what they had left in England, they came up with a variety of documents and declarations that stated their purpose and their mission. In these documents you will find that the purpose and intent and understanding for them was this:

AS A SIDE NOTE, In United  States Code, Title 1, you will find all of the organic laws that are still in place today and will confirm the statements in my post in addition to many founding documents, I will share upon request or you can Google them.

God created man with inalienable Rights (rights that no man or government was authorized to take away)

These men created government to PROTECT THOSE RIGHTS ( not to control or dictate them!)

So far, in this explanation, we have people that left a nation and its tyrant king in search of freedom;

They find this freedom and write declarations to prevent being ruled by another tyrant

They establish a constitutional republic (not a democracy) that's intent was TO LIMIT GOVERNMENT, NOT ITS PEOPLE!

In this republic, it was also an experiment to see how well people could not only govern themselves but to remain vigilant to continue this form of government.

This government was taken from Isaiah 33 that established checks and balances that maximized the scope and control of government thereby maximizing the freedom of the people.

You have probably heard that God and politics should be separated and that is an American tradition, which is the biggest lie the American people have ever been fed because the entire principle of government hinged on the fact that our country recognized Gods law in order to not only remain moral and religious but to maintain our self-government.

I’ll bet with all due respect, you have never read your constitution or Bill of Rights, I didn’t either till I was in my 40’s. Did you know it was the only documentation to maintain your freedom from a tyrant king or dictator and that without your knowledge of this documentation, you only have rights that you know you have or that your government says you have?

I can go on but let's to get to your issues, Am I assume you are being hypothetical? If you are, is it okay to suppose that I should be as well? Do you think that I do not support law enforcement? Do you think that I am stupid enough to think that I would allow a drunk guy walking into a mall waving a gun, if so what gave you that hair brained idea?

With respect to your next issue of driving drunk, they are not related so I will explain the drunken mall guy first.

 The drunk guy waving ( THREATENING)  a gun that bothers you has committed a crime, he is recklessly endangering others that are there, scaring children and all else, this man is not taking personal responsibility and should be punished, Biblically 40 lashes!

Someone that drinks behind the wheel is quite different in that he hasn't committed a crime. This is crucial in understanding the original intent of the law. I’m not saying that people should necessarily be allowed to drive drunk because it negates their personal responsibility but it come back to the fact that NO CRIME HAS BEEN COMMITTED. For a crime to be present, there has to be a witness, biblically, 2, a victim and physical damage that would confirm the crime rather than make it arbitrary and overused as it is now where they can just pull anyone over preemptively to just see if they have, rendering us guilty until proven innocent as is backwards from the intent of our laws that we are innocent before proven guilty.

If I may go hypothetical for a moment, before continuing, since I allowed you to be,...
... what if Governemnts took the power that were inherent in the people and used that power  and the money from the tax payers to control every move they made, through oppressive laws trashing their written law that limits government, to governemnts investing using tax dollars to make millions,  surveillance cameras, heavy taxation, create class warfare, open our borders, ship thriving businesses overseas killing jobs, welcoming the communists here to create jobs, control food and water, recreation, healthcare, change social attitudes, brainwash our citizens to believe that bigger government meant more freedom and that killing innocent babies and sodomy with a same sex partner was a choice  ultimately and collectively leading to create mass genocide?  WHat if the three branches of government  in a country decided on its own to become a dictatorship, to render local rural law enforcement and city councils to the a glabal authority? If they did, would you know or even care if it was subversive to not only the intent of this country but a danger to your freedom, WAKE UP ITS HERE!

Cars are not weapons, they are modes of travel. People say that cars, cell phones, bullets, liquor and all inanimate objects kill people which is ignorant and propagandizemnent of the truth. The fact is, you have been lied to again about the truth and it has conditioned you to believe that is true.

Do guns kill people? NO, people kill people, shall we ban people???

Does texting kill people? NO, people kill People, should we ban people????

Does Alcohol, knives or anything else kill people, NO! People kill people, should we ban people?

If you believe a car IS a "lethal weapon" than you should believe, but would be wrong, that anything that can kill someone IS a weapon, a baseball bat, a sheet, plastic wrap, medications etc. Things that people are killed with are USED AS weapons, not that they are weapons themselves and it a car is a weapon, why aren't they banned along with the desire to ban guns better ye since people kill and not objects, lets just ban people, You see how ridiculous it is?

The purpose and intent of my letter is not so much to be rude or abrasive but  to wake people up, it is to get them agitated, just a bit, to take the time to challenge me and others  on the issues and see where we are as a nation today and to challenge people like you to see if this kind of rotting societal decay and loss of freedom is what you want for your kids?  I’m glad you contacted me and would love to chat more.

Here is where I am and quite frankly where we should be, in my humble opinion:

We need God as ruler and to obey his commandments to remain free, and if not followed suffer harsh punishments because His will and Way is perfect, our founders even believed it!

We the people need to understand that without knowledge of history we repeat our mistakes and we are falling just like Judah, Israel, Egypt, Greece, Rome and others did.

The people need to be aware and remain vigilant on the limitations of government to insure and maximize our freedom and for our children

We need to understand our history and our laws and understand that governments have always ended in the mass genocide of its people if allowed unbridled control, which they have given themselves here in America!

We need to understand where our rights come from and that no man had the power take them away, therefore we need to understand that we were created in the image of God and obey his laws

We need to realize that our failure to acknowledge God not only make our rights subjective to the king or dictator but that these rights will decrease not be maintained enslaving your children.

We need to understand that when governments become oppressive, it is because they feel they are losing control and need to make more and more laws, also enslaving you and your children.

We need to understand that allowing government to encroach on our rights, violating the constitution because it sounds like it could be a good thing, opens the door to arbitrary rule and will them allow for them to step beyond those limitations as long as they can sell you on it, until they have finally gained enough control where they openly admit their intentions as thousands die in massive bloodshed created by every totalitarian regime in history.

Did you government sell you on seatbelts? It’s a great thing but should government tell you what to do in your car? Yes? ok then anything can be made illegal- stereo, food, beverages, rear view mirrors, children etc?

Did your government sell you on speed limits, texting, insurance, noise ordinances, tire sizes, window tint, illegal search ad seizure, environmental regulations and mpg restrictions,surveillance cameras, food, gun carry, children and so on? Sky is the limit, you've opened the flood gates!

Our Founding fathers stated that “the constitution was written for a moral and religious people and wholly inadequate for any other form of government.” If we are neither religious nor moral, how can we expect that our founding documents can possibly maintain our freedom by limiting government when people now feel that they can do whatever they want to? We were a nation of unity not division. It was because of our love and agreement on freedom the fact that the government that governs least governs best!

When you read your constitution, find out where it says that the people authorize government to make laws that restrict their freedom, You won’t find it because it completely contradicts the intent of the document, remember it was written to limit government, not the people because the people were under a completely different jurisdiction, GODS LAW!

As long as we obeyed Gods laws, we remained self-governed, if we chose to vacate our inalienable rights, government could and would rule over its people that will lead to mass genocide, don't trust me, trust history!

 Think about this....

If America was created on the understanding that our rights were inalienable from God and that no man could take them away, don't you think it’s interesting that the supreme court, a branch of government ruled to remove God? Why., TO CONTROL YOU!!! Your Bill of Rights was written to prevent this!

Separation of church and state is not American, it is Marxist, it is Sovietist or totalitarian to make you look to the government for all your rights and condition you to believe there is no God!

I would entertain at any time to speak with anyone, anywhere to speak more on these topics not because I am any big deal, I’m far from it, I am just relentless in my pursuit for freedom and I understand what is happening to us and I not only worry about my family, I'm worried about yours!

In a few weeks, You should come to court as I respectfully attempt to educate the judge on the principles of freedom, both the authority he does have and what he doesn't- somehow they feel they can say and do whatever they want to and we, as wee feeble subjects must obey...Under who's authority and jurisdiction?

I consider myself a law abiding citizen even though I pay unconstitutional taxes,( there are taxes I believe are proper- different topic) but until I can prove they are, at the risk of losing my home, I will submit to a point but I do have extreme disdain for others who fail to take personal responsibility for their actions those whom come here illegally, that a drunk waving guns or use their cars as weapons, it has forced government to at the hands of the minority to restrict the rights of the majority which is still outside their oath of office as I have mentioned before. Those I really have difficulty with and fear are those, like myself just a few short years ago, who put their hand over their heart, pledging allegiance to something of which they have no clue or those that have sworn and oath on one hand and violate that oath without even knowing it or who tell others the way it is without any knowledge of "what is" themselves and no knowledge of our incredible history!

We are all in a different place as we walk through this life and some are farther along in their understanding than others, but it is the ones that know and understand that MUST reach out to those that do not and warn them about what has happened and continues to happen. I can go on about all of it, Abortions, Vaccinations, GMO, detention centers, water and food control, food and water additives etc. Google: "Codex Alimentarious" or check out or to get a glimpse of whats happening nationally!

If you think this is about a drunk driver or a drunk gun waver or a speeding ticket, please look at the big picture,this is about your enslavement!!

Government is to protect the rights of the people with specific and enumerated powers. Article 1, Section 8, US Constitution

If you read this far, I appreciate it. Any further comments are always appreciated.

 Thank you,

Tom Munds


Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Frustratd in Middleton-Minot Street tree removal

Frustrated in Middleton- Minot Street tree issue                                                            6-5-12

I got a call a couple of days ago by a few angry citizens of Middleton about some trees on Minot street, one of the most heavily and most beautiful treed streets in the town that have allegedly been there for 50-100 years, some trees with diameters of three feet will now be removed.

 Evidently the city council in a recent meeting called for them to be cut down due to safety concerns and to prevent any liability being incurred upon the city should someone become injured or lose their life if one should fall, a reasonable and logical concern but was that all there was, some people aren't so sure so they asked me to look into it.

From the research I have found, this is what I know:

1.       The reason for this action was due to an April windstorm that blew over one of these trees creating concern for the city.

2.       After the tree had blown over there was some conversation between Mr. Anawalt and the city about who would pay for the removal each citing that it was the responsibility of the other.

3.                There was no written documentation on the meeting agenda regarding the trees for the council meeting of May 2nd, but was discussed, for the first time, briefly in the Public Works section of the meeting where Superintendent Gibbons stated trees located on the city right of way were damaged due to the windstorm and have already been evaluated and noted as ALL ten trees required removal due to poor health and no root base to eliminate the safety hazard but will return with bids for removal.

4.             There was no written documentation on the meeting agenda regarding the trees for the council meeting of May 16th, but was a second, brief discussion in the Public works comments in the meeting that stated there were three proposals. It was stated that tree removal was not a budgeted item but since the fund was under budget the work could be done?

5.             It was also noted that the property pins that were” found” to show that the trees were entirely on city property.

6.              The report continues to state that the evaluator stated some trees on Boise and Murphy were old but healthier and could be budgeted for a later date.

7.             The city attorney Yorgason did state that since the bid was under 25k, the city could hire who they wished for the job and due to the “time sensitive” nature the payment would be brought back and authorized with accounts payable on the consent agenda.

8.             There was no mention of the Minot Street tree issue in the meeting of June 6th, no vote, no public hearing as it appears to have been decided at the meeting dated May 16th.

9.             The authority derived for the removal of the trees was:

Safety concern and urgency

Idaho code Title 40-1310 (Pertaining to Highway district right of way maintenance) No other references were given.

When calling upon other statewide arborists to perform an evaluation, they stated it was a conflict of interest and if they got involved could jeopardize their employment with other cities and school districts.


If the trees created such an urgent safety hazard, from the storm in April, why wasn’t the street closed or modified before June? Why weren’t residents on that street given the urgent notification of such an eminent safety concern?

Why in Mr. Gibbon’s communication with the board, did he say ALL the trees were damaged?

How can tree removal not be a budgeted item but since the fund is under budget the work could be done?

How did he know that the trees were already in the cities right of way and not private property and why were Councilman Parry’s questions and dissent not addressed?

Were the locations of the trees surveyed or previously determined to be in the right of way? Why was a survey not done with the assumption that the survey pins could have been moved but accepted at their existence as “found?”

How is it that Mr. Gibbons authorized to spend tax dollars on an evaluation prior to the discussion of this event in council meeting, was this part of a job that was to be done prior to any discussion regarding these trees?

How is it that there were three bids for the tree removal but yet only one opinion on the condition of the trees and that the same person evaluated the trees was the same one that cut them down is that not a conflict of interest? When calling multiple arborists, they stated it clearly was.

Why was not the topic of salvage come up? If the trees belonged to the tax payer and were cut down by the tax payer, why didn’t the possibility come up of offering the tax payer the wood salvage from the trees?

Why was there no discussion on having trees planted to replace the ones that were being removed?

If these trees were removed to prevent safety concerns, who determines what is safe and where specifically is this authorized, state statutes, city ordinances, federal laws, state laws, one or all of the above?

Why in the meeting after to the tree removal was only evidence of the rotten tree brought before the public but not sections from the trees that were unaffected?

Why was evidence of the live owl nest removed shortly after it was found as if to hide something?

Why was there a vote on the work to be done if it was not necessary to have a public hearing and if it was a public hearing why was there not three readings and public comment, then on the agenda as an action item?

If there was dissent among one of the councilmembers, why weren’t his concerns taken under consideration and explained with regards to local ordinances or state statute’s

With the expert testimony of the tree evaluator how does he define “ old trees” and the severity of “internal integrity?”

Was the tree removal pre-emptively expedited by the city attorney because it was 1, under 25k and 2, the safety concern for the city and did these decisions bypass laws that protect the people from governments desire to get something accomplished at their expense “In the name of safety?”

Why was this issue voted on in council meeting when it was stated it didn’t need to be as a normal accounts payable and why if it were voted did not need three hearings and public comment?

Would the public not be entitled to know something that has such significance would be removed as these trees are not just shrubs to be cleared from the right of way?

Why was there no action item placed on the agenda?

Why in the information request did it state that no public notice was given but when asked members of the council they stated there was a notice in the water bill but not before the work had already begun?

Why were residents on that street not notified in writing about the safety concerns on that street and the work that would be done?

Why was it said by Qualitree’s employee that he never brings the large machinery to a job “ It was brought here to make a point?”

It seems that in prior meetings there was some concern by Mr. Anawalt, in the development of his property, that the trees in question were his responsibility therefore the road construction portion of the development was halted, supposedly the money to address the trees on personal property would be at great expense. If this is true, how could the trees be on private property in prior meeting minutes but today be on city property?

Would the property owner have something to gain if he stated the property was the property of the city?

Would the city have something to gain if the property were given to the city?

Why are City ordinance books nowhere to found during city council meetings as reference to be cited during approval of ordinances?

How have we come to be a community, a city, state our country, where hired private businesses are  afraid to come out in support of the people which appears only to confirm some wrong doing?

Who is in control, is it the people or is it our government? If it is the government, where have they derived this power, if it is the people, why is it they are powerless in the collection of information and holding our officials accountable?

I would ask, what derivations of authority were used to allow this issue to take place and what is the guarantee and protection to the citizens against government overreach?

Thursday, June 7, 2012

List of government controls, is your government killing humanity?

List of government controls - Is your government  killing  humanity?

Poisoning the body- vaccinations, unsafe medications, fluoride, Lithium and additives in the water diseases linked to these, controlled by the FDA increasing the need for medical attention.

Killing Americans: one million people every year are killed by the dangerous additives in food ( See “codex Alimentarious”, “GMO”. Monsanto, etc…, pharmaceuticals and water for the purpose of controlling the minds and populations controlled by the FDA.

Poisoning the atmosphere- barium and aluminum oxide in the air and water (salting the earth )but they restrict the citizens access to parks, through smog checks and other environmental concerns in the name of environmental safety controlled by the EPA

Control of Homeopathic remedies- No access to natural remedies forces the need to spend money on government healthcare and exposure to dangerous meds controlled by the FDA

Legalization of drugs- Drugs are big money and they are controlled through those that have it, minimal research will also tell you our federal government may be involved as it controls the poppy fields in the Middle East but marijuana crops worldwide. Not only does it make money and continue to fund those that bring it into the country but it numbs the minds of the citizenry keeping them sedated.

Legalization of Abortion( killing our unborn)- Population control; controlled by the ruling of the supreme court (with they never had the authority to do) But redefined and re-educated to believe it is a choice rather than murder.

Control of our education- To teach anti-Americanism, globalism, environmentalism, Marxism teach that rights are not inalienable from God but subject and to be determined by what your government says they are, subject to change or revocation teaching our children nor principles of freedom but subservient slaves, changing our language, social norms, re-educating people to believe that this list of controls are to preserve your freedom controlled by the National education association by the Federal government.

Increased and Heavy graduated Taxation- Tax on everything that is bought and every service provided imposed by all levels of government, intended to destroy the wealth of individuals and our nation, a government created retirement savings plan, like the implementation of the social security act that is now bankrupt. Why do we allow this to continue?

Employment control- wages controlled, production controlled, tax payer dollars funding American companies to relocate overseas due to taxation and environmental regulation, and exchanging American jobs left overseas with foreign communist investors that desire to collapse our free markets and republican form of government, making it impossible to get a job , at a decent wage to pay our local and national debt or to create national prosperity, to indoctrinate Americans into believing that Jobs are what is important not the wealth creation of production leading to the increased size in government due to its ability to create service non wealth creating jobs out of thin air, that add to the debt as a liability not a source of wealth creation or the production of product, all controlled by the Federal government or UN?.

High medical costs- Increase difficulty in getting proper care while creating huge profits for medical corporations and government, Subsidized by the Federal government at tax payer expense and detriment.

Increased government spending: leading to an unsustainable debt that will reduce any possibility for us to regain our personal, local or national economic prosperity, destabilize our local and national security, while our tax dollars are sent overseas funding wars and third world nations and who knows what else.

Increased government regulation: making it impossible for states, citizens and local government entities to function efficiently as well as re-educating our local government to believe that governments job is to replace every bastion and element of freedom with security, to have them believe they are not to protect our freedom (Rights) from tyrants but to protect us from ourselves. Increased regulation is increased taxation through environmentalism, globalism using scare tactics sponsored by your Federal government.

Environmentalism: Agenda 21, full incremental global control of the environment and its inhabitants using fear tactics about the demise of our planet when there is much evidence to the contrary. In the UK it is unlawful to have backyard BBQ’s!

Globalization: (G SUMMITS) The re-education of our children and their parents about the insignificance of personal, state and national sovereignty and the importance of making sure as Obama states “ That no nation is above another”, which is global socialism and eventual global enslavement at the expense of tax payers initiated and  promoted by the Federal government.

Healthcare-full control of costs, services and funding and the dictation of every facet of this care, including denial of services at any point in life they deem necessary, making it impossible to have any choice of service or cost, as government and corporate investors make billions!

Increased law enforcement: subsidized by the Federal government through the Dept. of Homeland security, the abolition of Posse Comitatus, the re-educating and funding of local law enforcement through fear that local law enforcement needs the help of the feds imposing the need of paramilitary operations, academies no longer teach the constitution as it was intended to diminishing the power and purpose of the oath of office.

Surveillance: Law enforcement is taught that “citizens are all criminals it’s just that we have not been caught yet” and in cases, like Nazi Germany, uses Romans 13 to justify their control over citizens. Local governments either forced to buy drones or re-educated to believe that drones will be good for the people, even though they have the ability to be armed and to put its people under surveillance, spying on people in their yards and their homes. There are surveillance cameras in every intersection in every city in every state and are being installed every mile on the freeway corridors but they state they are not cameras and installed for the ease of citizens to view road conditions. We are denied the truth of why they are installed when it is a fact that they are cameras and also in many states are used for generating revenue for the state giving speeding tickets etc., funded by the tax payer imposed by the Federal government- FEMA and the Department of Homeland security. TSA imposed the violation of the 4th amendment forcing illegal search without congressional act, “In the name of safety”. Law enforcement now authorized to force blood draws at a traffic stop etc…

School Lockdowns: Local schools are raping the tax payer by enslaving our kids by installing 200 or so surveillance cameras to spy on our kids, SRO’s walk the hallway, kids subject to random search and drug testing and having the doors locked during school hours with a “one touch lockdown button” and unable to leave considered “closed campus” but could also be considered “school lockdown” or day prison” done “in the name of safety” suggested, or coercively funded by tax payers by the Federal government.

Population control: Invested Government officials and controlling corporations desire to reduce the population of the Earth from 6 billion to about 1 billion. Methods of choice, abortion, one child policies, pharmaceuticals, food additives, water additives, vaccinations, food modifications, environment, employment, debt healthcare, control and dissemination of the family unit and complete control in every aspect possible

Destruction of the traditional family unit: The key to any moral and prosperous society is the family unit. Destruction includes the re-education of the insignificance of the family, leading to the reliance on the state rather than the family, to impose alternative family lifestyles that do not include the propagation of children through the acceptance of homosexual relationships, to teach the idea of “free sex”, to experiment, and to abandon commitment between husband and wife, brother and sister, to minimize the value of life through abortion and carelessness for the children’s parents abandoning them to state run care centers and hide the detrimental facts of unsafe sex or abstinence with the understanding we are no different than animals

Food control: Control, regulation and production of family farms. Farms across the country are funded with government subsidies from the Federal government; they are told what to plant, how much to plant and in many cases to destroy crops to control the pricing of the markets. These subsidies also require increased regulations on growth, how fast cattle, chickens, hogs or produce will grow making it necessary to utilize the already created harmful laboratory created ( Also government subsidized) growth additives that will be necessary to keep up with the demands for these foods or continued funding to feed their families. It is crucial to understand that the debtor is a slave to the lender ( Proverbs 22), with this understanding when you receive funds you are required to reciprocate with demands made upon you or you will be cut off-Fascism or government control of production!

Increased social services: Intended to make the populations reliant on the state, to teach irresponsibility to the individual and to criminalize its citizens for failure to pay into this system, to destroy the ingenuity and the capitalist spirit of prosperity that made us the economic marvel of the world, to make us apathetic, lazy and subservient to a tyrant king or dictator.

Immigration: Open borders, to increase vulnerability and destabilize our national security, to allow terrorism, drugs and deviants of every kind, to break the nation’s wealth, offering free services at the expense of the tax payer, to create class warfare  and inciting racism by elevating the rights of foreigners over the rights of the tax paying , law abiding citizens, to create animosity between those whom have obeyed the naturalization laws and those whom have come here illegally that are entitled to benefits faster than those whom have gone through the long naturalization process.

Multiculturalism: Benjamin Franklin stated “No nation has ever withstood the dangers of multiculturalism.” Is it difficult to believe that if we allow every walk of life to enter this country and believe the way they want to believe, their religion, their form of government, their traditions, their sexual preferences and immoral deviations that we will not only become divided but begin to fight against each other on the superior form of government, religion, sexual preference, forms of law etc.? This country had naturalization laws that were specific to the fact that you had to have two witnesses to the fact that you were not a thief a drunk, an adulterer that you could work and did work. The process took seven years so that they could understand, read, write and speak our language, understand our form of government but also to abandon allegiance to all foreign dictators, governments, forms of government and assimilate in your understanding of our moral and religious foundation.

People control: Ignorance or disdain for our constitution that limits government that allows government to expand indefinitely into every aspect of a citizens life, EPA, TSA, DEQ, NEA, DHS,DOJ, Internal revenue service, Human barcoding, RFID chip implants, endless unconstitutional executive orders, supreme court rulings, congressional bills like the Patriot act, the National Defense Authorization Act, the establishment of FEMA camps, the increase of paramilitary operations, the increase in surveillance equipment like drones and cameras, radiation equipment, the illegal search and seizure without probable cause, the expansive and arbitrary definition of “probable”, the mandatory blood draws, random checkpoints, random pull overs under a suspicion of drunk driving, the harassment by those desiring to become powerful becoming officers, the fact that justice is only allowed for those that can afford it, that you can no longer represent yourself and adequately defend yourself in court, the laws that state the only place we can receive justice is through a high paid BAR attorney and cannot choose who you wish to defend you in a court, The fact that you are not entitled to a trial by jury in ALL cases as the constitution defines but subject to a trial by judge, the belief that a judge possesses more power than he is authorized, that the power and scope of the sheriff has been minimized, the fact that the power of the people has been minimized, the fact that we are no longer allowed to challenge government on what laws they are abiding by because they can tell us to seek legal advice?

Unjust wars: Little research will yield tremendous results and information about the purpose of wars, who funded them and why. It will also clarify that it is also an attempt to create animosity between ourselves (through the degree and degradation of patriotism by stating we are against unjust wars) and other nations, depleting our wealth, strength, population, as a nation while we send our troops to be pawns to spread something that we should never want for ourselves, DEMOCRACY or globalism when the intent of our military was to fight for freedom it was to maintain our freedom not to be the world’s police. According to our laws there MUST be a declaration of war, somehow we have got around that by changing the meaning of words like “humanitarian missions” or “conflicts” etc.

Control of an oligarchy: It isn’t rocket science to believe we are not run by our elected government. It also isn’t rocket science to believe that the government originally created to protect our rights is now against us, Fed against state, Fed against citizens and local against citizens, citizens against citizens, not limited to just the reasons listed above, but is interested in protecting their interest which is the state that funds them, providing their salaries and benefits at our expense for life ( through us, the tax payer). It isn’t rocket science to see who is in control, where the money goes- the bankers, the corporations and those affiliated with it to further their agenda. Why did the bailouts go to the banks and not the people whom have had their wealth squandered by their government and continues to do so? Where did the federal government get the authority to print to subject us and future generations into  an impossible debt then lie to us and tell us this is no problem while still promoting the idea of socialism which only adds to the debt?

You must have been thinking as you were reading or hopefully you are asking yourself now, what does this all mean? If everything I have itemized is true, or even the majority of it is, is this the America you signed up for? Is this what you support? Does this look like the freedom you grew up with and do you want this for your children?

If you have been asleep or not paying attention, this is your wakeup call! If you are young, you have children and/perhaps grandchildren, what you do now directly affects them. If you do nothing and allow this to continue, you are part of the problem and not part of the solution.

There is tremendous evil in our presence. What will you do to restore the principles of freedom for you, your family and your posterity?

America is about to enter the darkest time and place it has ever been and it will affect every American for generations to come. If you knew a catastrophe was eminent, would you alert those you care about? This is my attempt to alert those I care about.

Your involvement is up to you. Your country is calling you, your family, neighbors and friends are calling you. Will you answer the call; the choice is up to you.

Blessings in the restoration of liberty for ourselves and our posterity,

Thomas A. Munds