Friday, June 19, 2009
The purpose of this interview was to try to correct the spin that was created by the media from the past two articles. I felt I had a chance to accurately make my point and that maybe people could would hear the message from my heart rather than reading an article that could be misunderstood.
After the interview I recieved several calls including one from my good friend Jarod, who has asked me to quit referring to him as my homosexual friend that you may have read about in past posts and has allowed me to now use his name. ( I appreciate that he is allowing me to use his name because it felt completely awkward to continue having to refer to him as my homosexaul friend because didnt know how else to describe him, thanks Jarod!)
My family came in after listening and was supportive of the interview and thought it went well.
I receved a call from Doug McConohay from 580 KIDO this morning and he asked me if I would do an interview tomorrow. I have decided to do the interview tomorrow morning at 7:15am along with the pastor of my church.
Well, Things are still on for tomorrow and I am excited and hopeful that we can find some mutual respect for eachother regardless of our differences.
BTW, my friend Jarod has agreed to stand or walk with me in the parade and I respect him for stepping out supporting me despite our differences.
Thursday, June 18, 2009
First, for some reason, I received a call from the American family news and he had mentioned that this story is being read at the national level, I was shocked and never wanted this kind of attention due to the possible media spin, but was told by both sides that it is probably better this way to "manage my message".
Later,I received a call from Nate Shelman from www.670kboi.com and accepted his radio interview because it would not be misunderstood because it wouldn't be edited. I have no idea if this interview is available online but I had a chance to speak from my heart and believe it went well.
As Sources had told me, this station is not well listened to by the LBGT community so my true intentions still may not be made known to those whom I wanted as my target audience. I hope it is better realized by my attendence.
I had mentioned to him that I spoke with the city clerk about the permit issue, which he claimed was the reason I was not allowed to enter the parade and my non-payment( which wasnt true) issue and he told me
" You are not going to have a vehicle in this parade and you should be lucky that I am allowing you to march in it!"
He went on further to say that if at anytime I become violent, enter into debate or have any conversations in opposition to this event I will be removed by the Boise Police. He had also agreed that if someone from the parade started something with our group that it would be my fault because I am the one, the minority, the antagonist. I had assured him that I was not there to be devisive, hateful, or to point fingers, I was there to offer water as a welcoming jesture and to share the good news as I figured the other 6 to 8 other churches were doing that are in attendence.
Is this a violation of my free speech, right to peacefully assemble, freedom of religion and an obstruction to be able to attend an event on a public street?
Does this guy really think that I would walk into an event like this whether by myself or in a small group and make 1000's of people angry on purpose?
Besides do people really believe everything they read in the newspaper and believe that what is written is actually all true? If this is so then we are in bigger trouble than I thought and have much bigger issues than this event.
Wednesday, June 17, 2009
He said that he thought I was nuts! He didnt realize I was entering the parade he just thought I was standing on the side.We laughed!
Evidently this story created a bit of a firestorm and I wanted to get his opinion on the article and the message he received from reading it and if the message in the article was articulated well enough to the discussion we had, since he knows me and knows the intent of my heart.
He said to me that he was offended because of the insinuation that I was there to offer help for recovery and that it implied that they had an illness. He said if this isn't your message, which he already knew, you need to clarify your message!
I told him that I was a bit disappointed in the article as well but I told him this was the problem with the media in that they never say the truth about the interview. They have to spin it into something that is much worse and larger than it is. To try to create chaos when it isnt necessary.
I told him my message was about sharing the love of Christ with others and to reach out, as a Christian, to others and to go where few or no one has been before. To send a subtle ( so much for that!) message that I am not a hatemonger with a hateful message nor a homophobe for in fact I am not afraid of them but want to reach out...doing what Christ would have me do, in the way I believe he would do it.
This was meant as a kind jesture, done with love in my heart and a smile on my face. I figured there was no way this would be taken the wrong way, afterall there were some 6-8 other churches I was informed of that would also be there.
I had a discussion with Senator LeFavour this afternoon to explain my intent and she shared her thoughts, as I did to find out that the sentiments were much the same as I had heard from my friend. I told her my intent, that I had no intention on making them feel unsafe but to offer the ultimate in safety, the Love of Christ.
She did say however that this approach was probably the most polite, or respectful way that she had ever seen and thanked me for my willingness to put a voice to the article. The conversation seemed to have went well.
I felt it was important for Ms. Lefavour to hear the heart behind the article rather than read the words of a page that may be mistakenly misunderstood hoping it would make the difference.
I am not a Whack-o, I am not insane. I have a clear vision to reach out to others to clear up the perceived misunderstanding that Christians are people who hate others, who will point fingers and judge those without any understanding of who they are and/or why they feel like they do and to engage in a culture that feels so ignored, like no one cares or that no one is listening.
Some may feel that my presence is stupid, to pass out water bottles with scripture...are their not people in the crowd who claim to be homosexual Christians? If these bottles of water are offensive then I am confused about the presence of the churches in attendence and will need to be enlightened.
You have my attention.
After several days I spoke with the director who seemed more than willing to accept my registration with little scrutiny and said we urge everyone to attend as long as they are friendly toward the LGBT community, I assured him I meant no harm.
I remember having difficulty paying online and was confused on where I might find the application to submit online so I called again to ask. The director very nicely told me that he already had my name on the list so even that the registration was past the due date, because of the payment issues, I would still be allowed in and all I needed to do was pay my fee and to do it on the online store. After several attempts my payment was confirmed.
I had called later wanting to know if the applicants were going to be informed of the details on where to meet and he said they were working on those and we should have those in a few days.
I called a week or so later to ask a few more questions regarding logistics when I was told on his voicemail that he was no longer the director and to call another number.
I called the number and I was politely greeted by an individual that said he was now in charge and that since I was on the list but hadn't received my payment I was no longer allowed a float in the parade. I shared my dissappointment and he told me the reason was because the permit for the city had already been turned in, so it wasnt up to him but the city.
This morning, I called the City clerks office and explained the situation and she told me that this permit had nothing to do with the my denial and that the city would not have a problem with me being part of the parade.
I made several attempts to contact this individual and have not received a return call to tell me why I was denied access.
Was the former director fired when people found out that he allowed my entrance? Sources say he had to take a leave but why would someone take a leave just before an event he planned and think that someone would just be able to pick up where he left off?
Was I denied for possible viewpoint discrimmination? From this perspective what I am seeing here is something that appears inconsistent with the teachings of this community, one of "tolerance," "diversity," and acceptance for all, after all they did say everyone was welcome and we urge the family to attend.
I realize that they could use the fact that I payed after the deadline and for that I am guilty as charged but I did have prior arraingments and an understanding with the director before he left. Is it the vendors or the attendees fault that they had a change in management one week before this event?
He had also stated that he would have no problem refunding my regstration fee. I asked How can you refund something you say you never received?
titled the above, however the story written, I believe did not convey the message quite like I hoped it would so I would like to take a moment to explain my intent.
If you have read some of my other posts you will find out that I had befriended a homosexual in January and we are still friends today. Over months of communication we have become friends despite our difference in worldviews and have a mutual respect for eachother.
The idea to enter the pride parade came after my friendship with this individual and while I had spent months reading about this so-called "Culture war" or battle of worldviews and the instances of hatred.
More is written in previous posts about this but because of my friendship with this homosexual I wanted to find out for myself if the Christians and the homosexuals DO hate eachother or whether this is just another instance of media spin.
I have also read articles about so-called Christians protesting these events carrying hateful messages, while on the other side their are Christian churches who agree with the gay lifestyle. both of which I feel,in my opinion, are innaccurate.
My intent is to attend this event with a smile on my face, with love in my heart, to pass out bottled water and cards with church information NOT to point fingers at anyone. This is more about what we are "for" rather than what we are "against."
I want to share a message of hope and change through the gospel of Jesus Christ through these water bottles and the cards, I want to be a messenger through this simple outreach.
The message of Christianity appears to be misunderstood. The gospel is a message of love not hate. If this message is confused I can only wonder why.Is it that there is little or no outreach from the church community or Is it because those who call themselves Christians are sharing hateful messages? The answer to this question to me is still a mystery but I am willing to attend this parade to find out for myself.
In response to Sen. Le Favour's comment in the above article, I would like to say that this is not about denying them a place and a day to celebrate nor to make them feel unsafe. Christianity is not to create devisiveness, or to make people feel unsafe but bring people to a place of ultimate safety with love in our hearts and a smile on our face.
Friday, June 12, 2009
Car Czars, compensation czars, energy czars, smoking czars, finance czars, human rights czars, tax czars, health and welfare czars etc...It appears that the American people have heard enough rhetoric and are now believeing it.
Anyone see a pattern hear? First there is the name that sounds like a name from something from a communist country, Russia, I think then there are the obvious branches of government that are being created daily to take control of every facet of society.
If the above are not enough or not believed we now have had or will have speech control, judicial control, gun control, internet, control, knife control, food control, car control, bank control, climate control, energy control, school control, church control, population control, health control, cigarette control and now we are to fill out a 100 page census that clearly violates our right to privacy? All in the first 100ish days?
These are all issues that the government has TAKEN from you and sugar-coating it so it will make it sound like it is a good thing...just as Hitler and so many others did.
Did it occur to anyone that Hitler's rise to power began after he took over volkswagon?
His plans for prolonged detentions, in addition to his apologies to middle eastern countries, closing Gitmo and having the tax payers pay for the welfare of these individuals at a rate of 200 billion, which equates to 12 billion per terrorist.
He tells these countries that we are no longer a Christian nation and in the same breath says we are the largest muslim population in the world, all the while manipulating the Constitution of the United States, mocking the Christian bible and holding all visible reverance to the Quoran with his precision and eloquence in the pronunciation of the muslim verbiage.
Promises transparency while denouncing his agenda is socialism. His appointees are all part of the "good ol boys club" that he promised to dissolve. His political appointees individual or collectively bring with them the continued corruption and total lack of integrity of previous administrations but in my eyes worse because he seems to have blinded the people with his good looks and his charm. He has accused good tax paying American citizens who have sacrificed for their country in the name of freedom only to come home and be labeled "right wing terrorists?
How have we become a nation that has sold out our God,morality,history integrity and respect for one another for a non-American muslim citizen who is seated as the most powerful seat in this country by corruption, that promises us prosperity, equal rights and money at our own expense?
Ben Franklin warned us "When the American citizens can figure out a way to vote in money, this will be the end of the republic"
This is another wake up call!!!
Thursday, June 11, 2009
A National Academy of Sciences' Institute of Medicine (IOM) study was conducted to assess them with results released in September 2000. In December 1997, the Department of Defense (DOD) announced that all US military forces would receive anthrax vaccinations. The Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program (AVIP) began in March 1998 even though IOM found little published peer-reviewed scientific information on its safety.
In its study, IOM reported evidence of an association between vaccinations studied and transient acute common health effects, including redness, swelling, and fever commonly associated with other vaccinations. However, conclusive proof of long-term problems wasn't determined - likely because study findings were skewed not to find them. More on that below.IOM also studied botulinum toxoid vaccines and found evidence of an association between the vaccine and transient acute local and systemic effects similar to anthrax vaccinations.
Again, conclusive proof of long-term adverse health effects wasn't found - another very dubious conclusion as evidence below explains.Military personnel usually get multiple vaccinations. IOM studied their effects but didn't prove or disprove any long-term adverse effects. However several independent studies of British Gulf War veterans found some link between multiple vaccinations and later health problems.
Gary Matsumoto is a New York-based award-winning investigative journalist. His 2004 book, "Vaccine A: The Covert Government Experiment That's Killing Our Soldiers and Why GIs are Only the First Victims" took sharp issue with IOM results and the Pentagon's denial of Gulf War syndrome.Investigating the shadowy vaccination development world, he discovered US military-employed doctors and scientists conducted secret medical experiments on US citizens in violation of the Nuremberg Code and fundamental medical ethics.
For its part, Nuremberg established legal medical experimental standards now incorporated into ethical medical codes, including:
-- requiring voluntary consent of human subjects without coercion, fraud, deceit, and with full disclosure of known risks;-- experiments should avoid "all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury;"-- experiments should never be conducted if there's "an a priori reason to believe death or disabling injury will occur;"-- risk "should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved..;" and-- experiments should be terminated if there's reason to believe they'll cause "injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject."
According to Matsumoto, the Pentagon violated these and other standards, betrayed the troops, and the fundamental duty of military and civilian leaders to protect them. Since at least 1987, biowarfare development trumped the welfare of tens of thousands of GIs used as human guinea pigs for inoculation with experimental unlicensed anthrax vaccines containing squalene - an oil-based adjuvant (to enhance immunity) known for decades to cause severe autoimmune diseases in lab animals, yet administered involuntarily without disclosure of its harmful effects to human health. Matsumoto wrote:
"The unethical experiments detailed in this book are ongoing, with little prospect of being self-limiting because they have been shielded from scrutiny and public accountability by national security concerns."
He suggested the "writing (was) on the wall" of what's to come with prospects now it may be soon."When UCLA Medical School's Michael Whitehouse and Frances Beck injected squalene combined with other materials into rats and guinea pigs back in the 1970s, few oils were more effective at causing the animal versions of arthritis and multiple sclerosis."
In 1999, immunologist Dr. Johnny Lorentzen at Sweden's Karolinska Institute found that on injection, an "otherwise benign molecule like squalene can stimulate a self-destructive immune response," even though it occurs naturally in the body.Other research shows that squalene is the experimental anthrax vaccine ingredient that caused devastating autoimmune diseases and deaths for many Gulf War veterans from the US, UK, and Australia, yet it continues in use today and for new vaccines development in labs.
There's a "close match between the squalene-induced diseases in animals and those observed in humans injected with this oil: rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus."Other autoimmune diseases are also linked to humans injected with squalene. "There are now data in more than two dozen peer-reviewed scientific papers, from ten different laboratories in the US, Europe, Asia and Australia, documenting that squalene-based adjuvants can induce autoimmune diseases in animals...observed in mice, rats, guinea pigs and rabbits.
Sweden's Karolinska Institute has demonstrated that squalene alone can induce the animal version of rheumatoid arthritis. The Polish Academy of Sciences has shown that in animals, squalene alone can produce catastrophic injury to the nervous system and the brain. The University of Florida Medical School has shown that in animals, squalene alone can induce production of antibodies specifically associated with systemic lupus erythematosus.
"Micropaleontologist Dr. Viera Scheibner conducted research into the adverse effects of adjuvants in vaccines and wrote:Squalene "contributed to the cascade of reactions called "Gulf War syndrome. (GIs developed) arthritis, fibromyalgia, lymphadenopathy, rashes, photosensitive rashes, malar rashes, chronic fatigue, chronic headaches, abnormal body hair loss, non-healing skin lesions, aphthous ulcers, dizziness, weakness, memory loss, seizures, mood changes, neuropsychiatric problems, anti-thyroid effects, anaemia, elevated ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate), systemic lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, ALS, Raynaud's phenomenon, Sjorgren's syndrome, chronic diarrhea, night sweats and low-grade fever."
Matsumoto's book includes numerous case studies of GIs afflicted with one or more of the above syndromes, their devastating effects, and the outlandish US government reaction - failing to acknowledge their existence or a connection between them and administered vaccines. Also denying the effects of other toxic Gulf theater exposures (like depleted uranium) as well as withholding meaningful treatments or protocols.US Army Captain George L. Skypeck spoke eloquently for many when he said:"Was the character of my valor less intense than those at Lexington? Was the pain of my wounds any less severe than those at Normandy? And was my loneliness any less sorrowful than those at Inchon? Then why am I forgotten amonst those remembered as 'heros?' "
If mass vaccinations are ordered, millions of Americans may ask: Why do you keep using unsafe vaccines and other drugs when clear evidence shows their dangers? Why do you jeopardize all Americans by unleashing a future plague of serious illnesses, diseases, and disabilities? Why have you willfully and maliciously ruined my health?Immunologist Dr. Pamela Asa first recognized autoimmune diseases showing up in GIs that mirrored those in lab animals injected with oil formulated squalene adjuvants.
By 1997, hundreds of millions of dollars had been spent testing vaccines containing them, in animal studies since 1988 and human clinical trials since 1991 - by leading research institutes like NIH, the National Cancer Institute, and the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).According to Matsumoto, today, "Squalene adjuvants are a key ingredient in a whole new generation of vaccines intended for mass immunization around the globe" even though researchers at Tulane Medical School and the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research proved "that the immune system responds specifically to the squalene molecule."
The immune system "see(s) and recognizes it as an oil molecule native to the body. Squalene is not just a molecule found in a knee or elbow - it is found throughout the nervous system and the brain." When injected in the body, the immune system attacks it as an enemy to be eliminated. Eating and digesting squalene isn't a problem. But injecting it "galvanize(s) the immune system into attacking it, which can produce self-destructive cross reactions against the same molecule in the places where it occurs naturally in the body - and where it is critical to the health of the nervous system."Once self-destruction begins, it doesn't stop as the body keeps making the molecule that the immune system is trained to attack and destroy.
Immunologist Dr. Bonnie Dunbar also did extensive research on hepatitis B-inflicted illnesses and found similar autoimmune processes involved in molecular mimicry in people with devastating neuroimmune syndromes after getting vaccine injections.Matsumoto says "Squalene is a kind of trigger for (a) real biological weapon," what Soviet researchers called "a biological time bomb!!" and Matsumoto says is "the immune system." When its "full repertoire of cells and antibodies (attack) tissues they are supposed to protect, the results can be catastrophic."
He and Dr. Pam Asa conclude that "Oil adjuvants are the most insidious chemical weapon ever devised," including ones with squalene - something the Soviets knew could be used as a weapon in the 1980s.Matsumoto says that "the real problem with using squalene (isn't) that it mimics a molecule found in the body; it is the same molecule. So what American scientists conceived as a vaccine booster (or what's now being developed in labs) was another 'nano-bomb,' instigating chronic, unpredictable and debilitating disease.
When the NIH....argued that squalene would be safe because it is native to the body, just the opposite was true," and, of course, still is. "Squalene's natural presence in the body made it one of the most dangerous molecules ever injected into man" and using it in vaccines is outlandish and criminal.So why does Washington sanction its use? According to Matsumoto: "scientists in the United States are now literally invested in squalene. Army scientists who developed the second generation anthrax vaccine have reputations to protect and licensing fees to reap (as well as) worldwide rights to develop and commercialize the new recombinant vaccine for anthrax" and ones for other health threats.
Disturbingly, "Many of the cutting-edge vaccines currently in development by the NIH and its corporate partners contain squalene in one formulation or another. There is squalene in the prototype recombinant vaccines for HIV, malaria, herpes, influenza (including the swine strain), cytomegalovirus and human papillomavirus." Some of these "are intended for mass immunization(s) around the globe" and that possibility should terrify everyone enough to refuse any mandate or doctor's prescription to take them.Another problem is that "Autoimmunity (takes) years to diagnose" because early symptoms (headaches, joint pain, etc.) are so vague they can easily be from other causes.From inception, vaccines have always been dangerous enough for some experts to call them biological weapons undermining health, manipulating and crippling the immune system, and creating the possibility of future debilitating diseases.
So Big Pharma's solution is new, more potent genetically engineered vaccines and drugs that may end up harming or killing many who take them, especially people with weakened immune systems.Matsumoto and others sounded the alarm to alert everyone to avoid these poisons masquerading as protective drugs. In fact, they benefit only the bottom lines of companies that manufacture them and scientists reaping generous royalties.Stephen Lendman is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization. He lives in Chicago and can be reached at email@example.com.
The writers report that "The Obama administration is considering an unprecedented fall vaccination campaign" to include regular and Swine Flu shots, the latter because it's "spreading across the globe."HHS' Dr. Robin Robinson said "We are moving forward with making a vaccine," and if the government proceeds with a national program, enough supply will be produced to provide two doses for all Americans with spokespersons like National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Anthony Fauci, claiming adverse reactions aren't to be expected and adding another shot for Swine Flu "should not present a problem.
"The New York Times also hypes the scare with reports of city schools closed after unconfirmed Swine Flu cases, a few adult deaths blamed on H1N1 bringing the claimed total in the city to seven, and the World Health Organization (WHO) saying on June 3 that it's moving closer to declaring a worldwide (Level 6) Swine Flu pandemic - even though none exists.With all the hype, misinformation, and willful lies WHO's Dr. Keiji Fukuda, in charge of flu, said only 117 deaths globally have been "blamed" on Swine Flu and any warning may include the caveat that the virus isn't very lethal.
A more accurate statement would explain that no forensic evidence links any deaths to H1N1, and influenza annually kills about 30,000 people in America alone - something the major media never report or that scattered accounts of any type flu deaths worldwide are no cause for alarm or reason for scary headlines.It's also unconscionable for the WHO, US and other nations' officials to spread lies, deception, and hysteria so major pharmaceutical companies can foist dangerous vaccines and other drugs on unsuspecting people, harming their health and making them vulnerable to later diseases and possible early deaths.
Massachusetts May Be A Forerunner of What's to ComeOn April 28, the Massachusetts Senate unanimously passed a pandemic flu preparation bill that rises to the level of martial law. If approved by the House and signed into law, it will mandate among other measures:--
"vaccination, treatment, examination, or testing of" all individuals involved in providing health care - as perhaps step one before ordering the same process for all state residents;-- owners or occupiers of all premises "to permit entry into and investigation of the premises;"-- closure, evacuation, and decontamination of all suspected facilities; and-- restricting or prohibiting "assemblages of persons."Other states may be planning similar measures as precursors to mandatory nationwide vaccinations and overall suspension of civil liberty protections.
The Project BioShield Act of 2004 (S. 15) became law on July 21, 2004 "to provide protections and countermeasures against chemical, radiological, or nuclear agents that may be used in a terrorist attack against the United States by giving the National Institutes of Health contracting flexibility, infrastructure improvements, and expediting the scientific peer review process, and streamlining the Food and Drug Administration approval process of countermeasures.
"In other words, the FDA may now recklessly approve inadequately tested, potentially dangerous vaccines and other drugs if ever the Secretaries of Health and Human Services (HHS) or Defense (DOD) declare a national emergency, whether or not one exists and regardless of whether treatments available are safe and effective. Around $6 billion or more will be spent to develop, produce, and stockpile vaccines and other drugs to counteract claimed bioterror agents.
The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act slipped under the radar when George Bush signed it into law as part of the 2006 Defense Appropriations Act (HR 2863). It lets the HHS Secretary declare any disease an epidemic or national emergency requiring mandatory vaccinations. Nothing in the Act lists criteria that warrant a threat. Also potential penalties aren't specified for those who balk, but very likely they'd include quarantine and possible fines.
The HHS web site also says the Secretary may "issue a declaration....that provides immunity from tort liability (except for willful misconduct) for claims of loss caused, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from administration or use of (vaccine or other pharmaceutical) countermeasures to diseases, threats and conditions determined by the Secretary to constitute a present, or credible risk of a future public health emergency...."The industry-run US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) notoriously rushes inadequately tested drugs to market, putting their efficacy and safety into question, and turning those who use them into lab rats. It includes everyone if a mass vaccination is ordered on the mere claim of a public emergency - no proof required.
The Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act (S. 3678) is the other worrisome law, effective December 19, 2006. It amended "the Public Health Service Act with respect to public health security and all-hazards preparedness and response, and for other purposes." Even its supporters worry about issues of privacy, liability, and putting profits over public health. Critics express greater concerns about dangerous remedies for exaggerated or non-existant threats as well as mass hysteria created for political purposes.
At least one other measure is also worrisome - The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act (MSEHPA). So far it's just a proposal by the Center for Law and the Public's Health - "A Collaborative at Johns Hopkins and Georgetown Universities (as) a primary, international, national, state, and local resource on public health law (and) policy for public health practitioners, judges, academics, policymakers, and others.
"MSEHPA is now "track(ing) legal responses to the emerging international response to the 2009 H1N1 (swine flu) outbreak, including declarations of public health emergency at the international, national, state, and local levels...." even though forensic evidence can't confirm any H1N1 deaths. No emergency exists anywhere, and reporting one is all hype to sell dangerous drugs to unsuspecting people globally.
On its web site, the ACLU says this about MSEHPA:It's "written in a way that doesn't adequately protect citizens against the misuse of the tremendous powers that it would grant in an emergency.
(It's) replete with civil liberties problems. Its three top flaws are that:
(1) It fails to include basic checks and balances (by) grant(ing) extraordinary emergency powers (that) should never go unchecked. (It) could have serious consequences for individuals' freedom, privacy, and equality."
(2) "It goes well beyond bioterrorism (with) an overbroad definition of 'public health emergency" that may be anything a local or national authority declares for any reason with no conclusive evidence for proof.
(3) "It lacks privacy protections (and) undercut(s) existing protections for sensitive medical information."MSEHPA worries other organizations besides the ACLU, both conservative and progressive - including the Free Congress Foundation, American Legislative Exchange Council, conservative association of state legislators, Human Rights Campaign, and Health Privacy Project.
Even worse, a new US report on these secret Bilderberg meetings states: “Investigative journalist Daniel Estulin, whose information from inside Bilderberg has routinely proven accurate, states that the global elite’s plan to completely destroy the economy and ultimately lower global population by two thirds has stoked fears even within Bilderberg itself that the fallout from such chaos could ultimately result in the globalists losing their control over the world.
Prior to the Bilderberg Meeting, the Kremlin report continues, most of the West’s wealthiest elite convened at an unprecedented secret meeting in New York called for and led by the staunch New World Orderlist David Rockefeller to plot the demise of the US Dollar and which, strangely, was reported in the US mainstream propaganda media, but to which the dissident American website PrisonPlanet.Com questioned by stating:“ABC News today devoted a prominently featured three page story to a “secret meeting” of rich philanthropists which took place earlier this month in New York, and yet one of the biggest news corporations in America was completely silent during a far more important meeting of around 150 of the world’s powerbrokers at the Bilderberg conference last week.
”To the ‘ultimate’ outcome of the plans of the West’s elite classes, connived under the auspicious of the Nazi backed Bilderberg Group, Russian Intelligence Analysts predict that their fears of “losing control” due to the catastrophic chaos they are embroiling our World in are, indeed, valid, especially since the unleashing upon our Earth’s population the bioengineered H1N1 Swine Flu variant that is continuing its unrelenting march of death and illness across our entire Earth, and when coupled with the total collapse of the Global economic system can only lead to Total War.
Russian President Medvedev has joined calls by China, Brazil, and other Nations, to prepare for the collapse of the US Dollar and has put forth the Russian Ruble as one of a number of International Reserve Currencies to replace the soon to collapse American currency, and as warned about by the St. Petersburg Times News Service:“Last week, despite the apparent appeal of the dollar in the midst of this global crisis, the U.S. bond market — often a harbinger of future trends — suddenly panicked, and the prices of U.S. Treasury bonds plummeted with 10-year yields jumping to over 3.3 percent.
This could be ominous for the future of the dollar.”Even worse for these American people is how horrific their immediate economic future is going to be, and as best articulated by Gary Dorsch, the editor of Global Money Trends, who writes: “No one is asking who will purchase the $1-trillion of US Treasuries to be offered to the market by September.
Once that colossal amount of paper is bought, who will purchase another $5-trillion of Treasury paper over the next four-years, as the US-government plunges deeper into insolvency. The Federal Reserve would be forced to print (monetize) vast quantities of US-dollars to pay the principal and interest on the national debt that is not covered by tax revenue.”
Wednesday, June 10, 2009
Since the latter part of Obama's campaign we have been hearing faint comments that some of the new adminstrations plans are "Socialism" but quickly stifled by those who say "That isn't socialism" like the meaning of Socialism has changed.
Socialism is still defined by The American Heritage dictionary as:
Socialism as a system of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods are owned by a centralized government that plans and controls the economy. Both Webster and Random House identify Socialism as a "Marxist theory." Both clearly defined as "wealth distribution" which is what Obama said he wanted to do. So if this is not socialism Mr. Obama would you kindly publish your own dictionary so your loyal subjects will not be confused?
Karl Marx said himself that any good communist would have to believe in these theories or they would not be a good communist.
Socialism requires a totalitarian system; that gives the ruling gang the power to distribute the fruits of other people's labor to its political pals. That is what is happening to the United States as President Obama proceeds with his goal of "remaking America."
If "change" is what we voted for, maybe what he meant was that change was all you would have to your name after the first hundred days.
When all of this was going on years ago,I was too young to realize what the word Socialism means. It connotes a system that is profoundly un-American. Socialism has virtually disappeared from our national lexicon since the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) collapsed because of Ronald Reagan's policies, and the National Socialist (Nazi) Party was destroyed by the U.S. in World War II.
Obama's takeover of the American auto industry is so breathtaking in scope and power that it proves all the accusations about Socialism. The takeover was followed by orders to close 789 local Chrysler dealers, notices to 1,100 General Motors franchises that they will be shut down by next year, and estimates that total dealer shutdowns will rise to 3,000.
Some of these local dealerships have been family-owned for generations. The Chrysler and GM dealership closings are estimated to eliminate 187,000 jobs, which is more than the number of people who work for the two automakers.
Now we can see the icing on the cake for the politicians who use economic dictatorship to punish those who resist Socialist planners. Nearly every one of the closed local dealerships had donated to Republican candidates, almost none was an Obama contributor, and some dealerships owned by Democrats are not getting the ax.
These closings come after Obama's extraordinary cash and stock favoritism to one of his principal campaign supporters, the United Auto Workers union. The Car Czar, Steve Rattner, was a top Democratic fundraiser (surprise, surprise!).
Obama seems to be captivated by the un-American notion of running the country through Russian-style czars empowered to issue czarist-style ukases. He has already named about 20 czars (more than the Russians had over four centuries), and his latest is a Cyber Czar.
This year's deficit will be $1.841 trillion - $89 billion more than previously estimated. It's so difficult to explain to the American people the gigantic dimensions of what Obama is doing that we are suffering from what has been labeled "insensitivity to scope." Things continue to happen so fast that even the most affluent readers are finding difficulty keeping up.
Nationalized healthcare, graduated taxes, government ownership of the private sector, welfare programs and the pending inevitable economic collapse...
No matter how you slice it, THIS IS SOCIALISM!!
thank you in part to www.ChristianWorldviewNetwork.com
Our first africa-american president who graced us all with his charisma,charm and award willing smile and character may not be who people really think he is. I know who and what he is, I am just hoping it isn't to late for others to see it.
Aside from the many constitutional violations that have been committed, ther mismanagement of funds, the lies to his subjects that we wouldn't be taxed under a certain amount, our tax dollars going to speacial interest groups, the furtherment of welfare programs and socialism ideology as an obvious priority the question still has not been answered.
We certainly know that Obama is no slacker when it comes to cheating and /or fulfilling his agendas rather than the fulfillment of his American subjects. At least it certainly appears that way. When pressed about important and relevant issues surrounding his life and background we get the following results:
Original, vault copy birth certificate — Not released
Certification of Live Birth — posted on internet — Counterfeit
Obama/Dunham marriage license — Not released
Obama/Dunham divorce — Released (by independent investigators)
Soetoro/Dunham marriage license — Not released
Soetoro adoption records — Not released
Soetoro/Dunham divorce — Released (by independent investigators)
Fransiskus Assisi School School application — Released (by independent investigators)Punahou School records — Not released
Selective Service Registration — Released — Counterfeit
Occidental College records — Not released
Passport — Not released and records scrubbed clean by Obama’s terrorism and intelligence adviser.
Columbia College records — Not released
Columbia thesis — Not released
Harvard College records — Not released
Harvard Law Review articles — None
Baptism certificate — None
Medical records — Not released
Illinois State Senate records — None
Illinois State Senate schedule — LostLaw practice client list — Not released
University of Chicago scholarly articles — None
Is Barrack "Hussein" Obama a natural born citizen? I have never felt that he is in that I had spent so much time reading about it during the campaign and there were too many missing including answers to the above for it to be possible.
Case in point, I received an email from a friend that revealed a lawsuit, still one of many, that forced him to reveal his college transcripts from Occidental college see:
Keyes v Obama. ...> 126.96.36.199/.../AP-Article-says-Obama-released-his-Occidental-> College-records-on-April-1
According to these records it stated that Obama was a foreign student.
Released today, the transcript indicates that Obama, under the name Barry Soetoro, received financial aid as a foreign student from Indonesia as an undergraduate at the school. The transcript was released by Occidental College in compliance with a court order in a suit brought by the group in the Superior Court of California.
The transcript shows that Obama (Soetoro) applied for financial aid and was awarded a fellowship for foreign students from the Fulbright Foundation Scholarship program. To qualify, for the scholarship, a student must claim foreign citizenship. This document would seem to provide the smoking gun that many of Obama's detractors have been seeking.
Along with the evidence that he was first born in Kenya and there is no record of him ever applying for US citizenship, this is looking pretty grim. The news has created a firestorm at the White House as the release casts increasing doubt about Obama's legitimacy and qualification to serve as president. When reached for comment in London, where he has been in meetings with British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, Obama smiled but refused comment on the issue.
Britain's Daily Mail has also carried the story in a front-page article titled, "Obama Eligibility Questioned," leading some to speculate that the story may overshadow economic issues on Obama's first official visit to the U.K. In a related matter, under growing pressure from several groups, Justice Antonin Scalia announced that the Supreme Court agreed on Tuesday to hear arguments concerning Obama's legal eligibility to serve as President in a case brought by Leo Donofrio of New Jersey.
This lawsuit claims Obama's dual citizenship disqualified him from serving as president. Donofrio's case is just one of 18 suits brought by citizens demanding proof of Obama's citizenship or qualification to serve as president. Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation has released the results of their investigation of Obama's campaign spending.
This study estimates that Obama has spent upwards of $950,000 in campaign funds in the past year with eleven law firms in 12 states for legal resources to block disclosure of any of his personal records. Mr. Kreep indicated that the investigation is still ongoing but that the final report will be provided to the U.S. attorney general, Eric Holder.
Mr. Holder has refused to comment on the matter, the Eric Holder who is part of the corrupt chicago white house entity that Obama promised to eliminate and create transparency?
The media has successfully sold out this country with its failure to research and expose the truth , this administration and it's "slut media" are an abomination and an embarresment to anyone who respects integrity in journalism.
If there are citizens who doubt his citizenship or anything else he says or does because of the lack of evidence, why are we considered rascist hategroups? Aren't we just concerned Americans who value integrity in our leadership?
Have we come to the point where we can no longer tell the difference?
For more information on the obamanation of this country please check out:
http://www.obamafile.com/ and http://www.obamawatch.com/
Tuesday, June 9, 2009
I am not trying to imply that anyone is stupid here, far from it, it just made me think about how our communication skills and language have changed, becoming more "relative" over the years and how much more difficult, if things continue to change as they have, it will be in the future.
The conversation as I remember began with why we feel so differently about issues and how it came to be that way. I asked him "If you do not believe in God, how do you define your boundaries of what is right and wrong?" He said that he believes in a "collective universal conscience."
I asked him where it came from and how he knows it exists and all he could tell me is that "it just does, it has always existed" I never got the chance to ask him how he knew it always existed or how to identify what this "collective conscience" is and when he or it is being used but he did give me an example. He said "it is like killing people, people just know that it is wrong..." My answer was "does everyone know it's wrong?
I shared with him my perspective in that I found this "collective universal conscience" to be illogical, unclear,unfounded and unproven.
I also shared with him that, as a Christian, our foundations and limitations of right and wrong are found throughout scripture, like the 10 commandments. I also shared that his collective conscience was something that may have been misunderstood for what may have been a biblical foundation, after all do the 10 commandments not make absolute sense, logically and uphold common sense ideals? Afterall, aren't thou shall not murder, steal, covet, bear false witness etc, the only way to treat others with the upmost respect? Our founders of this country spoke often about these issues.
The conversation shifted gears when I had mentioned that I was meeting with the school board about some of the innacuracies my children were being taught in school when I had mentioned to him that as parents "we have the right and moral obligation to educate and grow up the way in which we feel is best, to quote one of many scriptures: "Teach them the way and when they are older they will not depart from it". It is the duty of the parents. Government apparently doesn't believe in the "free will" ideology either because of their continued denial of rights to the parents.
I was shocked to find his answer when he stated that "Parents do not have the right to brainwash their children-they should have free will". "They should have the right to make decisions and do as they please, to make their own decisions" If this is so should adults claim free will too? If it becomes my free will to teach my children who then is supposed to tell me when my free will stops and my childs free will begins?
It has been several days since this conversation and it has affected me greatly. My heart is heavy and the lack of ability to have him see that his perspective is based only on "feelings without the use of logic, reason or common sense was discouraging. How can people go through life, making decisions based on nothing but feelings? Is truth, logic, common sense, reason no longer important?
Many individuals that I speak to are well educated in so many areas and appear so bright, how is it that they cannot see it? Or do they not want to see it?
2Peter 3:5 For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old..."
If "collective conscience " and people are "inherently good"are what people believe to be true Then why do people kill, steal, covet, bear false witness, commit adultery,abuse their children, corrupt governments, create computer viruses, hack computers,create spam, control others and when given a choice would rather commit sins than do good? So why is it that we need contracts for monetary transactions, have to read small print or listen to advertisements where the advertiser reads his disclosure statements and waivers at warp speed when 50 years ago all of this was simply done with a handshake?
The bible tells us, as Christians, that "we are all but sinners, there is not one good,no not one". By Gods word and the statistics of the world outside which one makes more sense?
If "free will" is what we believe and think is best for our society maybe we should look at the stats of the murder rate, abortion rate, premartial sex, disease, broken families, corruption, rape, greed in addition to the moral relativism of law that will make it impossible to adequately punish offenders and actually may confuse the victim from the perpatrator or to decipher the truth from a lie.
If free will is what we believe how will you explain that committing murder is wrong when the person commiting it will consider it a violation of his free will?
Should I allow my children to break into a home, restaurant? Should I let them loose with spray paint cans on the exterior of your car? What do the laws of collective conscience say about that?
Psalms 11:3 If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do?
Has anyone ever wondered if this "free will" mentality is what may be part of the problem we face in this world today?
It is clear that we live in a much different world today than we did before 1962 when bibles were removed from schools. We were a nation of citizens who had respect for eachother and the law.You could leave your home without locking your door and leave your keys in your car.
Talking out of turn and chewing gum in class were replaced with date rape drugs and school shootings. In high school we showed our principal our new gun purchased at the local 5 and dime that we kept in our car to a complete school lock down and zero tolerance for our second amendmant right guaranteed by our Constitution?
Collective conscience? people are inherently good? Free will?
Sinners denying God seeking after the lusts of the flesh and their temporal interests without need for accountability?
Saturday, June 6, 2009
It wasn't mentioned on the news... just went by on the ticker tape at the bottom of the CNN screen. Obama funds $20M in tax payer dollars to immigrate Hamas Refugees to the USA. This is the news that didn't make the headlines...
By executive order, Barack Obama has ordered the expenditure of $20.3 million in "migration assistance" to the Palestinian refugees and "conflict victims" in Gaza. The "presidential determination", which allows hundreds of thousands of Palestinians with ties to Hamas to resettle in the United States, was signed on January 27 and appeared in the Federal Register on February 4
Few on Capitol Hill, or in the media, took note that the order provides a free ticket replete with housing and food allowances to individuals who have displayed their overwhelming support to the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) in the parliamentary election of January 2006.
Let's review... itemized list of some of Barack Obama's most recent actions since his inauguration:
His first call to any head of state, as president, was to Mahmoud Abbas, leader of Fatah party in the Palestinian territory.
His first one-on-one television interview with any news organization was with Al Arabia television.
His first executive order was to fund/facilitate abortion(s) not just here within the U. S., but within the world, using U.S. tax payer funds.
He ordered Guantanamo Bay closed and all military trials of detainees halted. He ordered overseas CIA interrogation centers closed.
He withdrew all charges against the masterminds behind the USS Cole and the "terror attack" on 9/11.
Withdrew ALL charges of coersion and intimidation from his black panther buddies.
Denies to begin an investigation into ACORN's known corrupt activities and continues with his administration to find a way to blame Bush for things that have surfaced after he became president.
Now we learn that he is allowing hundreds of thousands of Palestinian refuges to move to, and live in... the US at American taxpayer expense. These important, and insightful, issues are being "lost" in the blinding bail-outs and "stimulation" packages. Doubtful? To verify this for yourself:
www. thefederalregister. com/d. p/2009-02-04-E9-2488
The constitutional violations of these issues and others would and should have him and his administration brought up on charges of treason , aiding and abedding the enemy, and for refusing to uphold what he swore UNDER OATH to do....
As the foundations of this country and it's history dictate our leaders swore their oath under God. If we no longer have a belief or trust in God for protection and His contiued blessings who will take the place of the one we have always looked to?
I question when he swore under oath, who did he swear to? Even today, it is difficult to tell where and who his allegiance is to. For someone who claims to have the US in his best interest, his actions speak differently.
Thursday, June 4, 2009
I wanted to take this opportunity to thank them for their consideration in offering an alternative perspective to their publication and hope this becomes more and just a "lead balloon".
I try to share news that the mainstream media seems to miss or refuse while offering more of a conservative approach to these issues. I try to expose some of the common myths, in my opinion, that have confirmed "moral relativity", socialism, marxism, postmodernization and the lie Americans have been fed about the separation of church and state. To educate,factually about the foundations of this country, what it was and what it was not. I offer my perspective on the contraversial subjects like homosexuality, abortion and,lately, what seems to be happening to this country with the current president and his administration.
I welcome and encourage dialogue in the desire that we will all learn more about one anothers worldview. I do believe that truth is not relative in that:
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not everyone is entitled to their own facts"
The truth exists as it is, unbiased, unchanging, and needs to be understood. It is one thing to accept history or any subject matter and choose not to accept it but quite another to try to change the facts denying they ever existed.
All I ask is that the truth be known and give the people the ability to make their own EDUCATED choices.
We have Black history month and some others but seem like such coincidence that we have only offered monthly acknowledgements to issues pertianing to minorities, or as some consider them "special interest groups." I am proud that America has come to a place where we no longer treat the black man as less of a human but the difference in this acceptance here is that there is no violation of natural law, civil law or even biblical law.
How is fairness encorporated into this when we have neither a "white history month" nor heterosexual parades? White entertainment television? or college funds dedicated to "white people?"
So far we have "gay pride month", gay parades, gay sponsorships and promotions over other groups, gay legislation, gay awareness and education and those who oppose are being "forced"
to be subject to it, is this not a violation of personal liberty?
Can this and should this not be an issue that is a personal and private issue? Should those who oppose be able to enjoy their own lifestyle and teach their children in the way they choose without being subject to the fulfillent of agendas of whom are not only the minority but whom have fulfilled their agenda by violating civil law and now made as a monthly awareness? How do Americans really feel about a decision that the president made without the will of the people...isn't this un-constitutional? DO the people even know that this was even a violation?
The federal ONE DAY holidays are listed here:
• January 1, 2009: New Year's Day [Jan. 1 every year]
• January 19, 2009: Martin Luther King Day [3rd monday in Jan]
• January 20, 2009: Inauguration Day [every 4th year]
• February 16, 2009: Presidents Day (observed) [3rd monday in Feb] note: Presidents Day is also Washington's Birthday (observed)
• May 25, 2009: Memorial Day (observed) [last monday in May]
• July 4, 2009: Independence Day [July 4 every year]
• September 7, 2009: Labor Day [1st monday in Sept]
• October 12, 2009: Columbus Day (observed) [2nd monday in Oct]
• November 11, 2009: Veterans' Day [Nov. 11 every year]
• November 26, 2009: Thanksgiving Day [4th thursday in Nov]
• December 25, 2009: Christmas Day [Dec. 25 every year]
So out of all holidays am I to understand that GLBT day is more important(indicated by the length of time of the particular holiday) than the holidays we all share? The proclaimed "GREATER GOOD of ALL"?Inauguration day? presidents day? memorial day? independence day? Labor day, Columbus day? Thanksgiving and Christmas?
how about these?
• January 24 [every year]: Belly Laugh Day [info]• February 2 [every year]: Groundhog Day• February 12 [every year]: Lincoln's Birthday• February 14 [every year]: St. Valentines Day• February 24, 2009: Fat Tuesday (a.k.a. Paczki Day) - day before Lent starts• February 22 [every year]: Washington's Birthday (traditional date, not observed date)• March 17 [every year]: St. Patrick's Day• April 10, 2009: Good Friday (U.S. stock market is closed on this day)• April 12, 2009: Easter Sunday• April 1 [every year]: April Fool's Day• April 22 [every year]: Earth Day [info]• April 22, 2009: Administrative Professionals Day (National Secretary's Day) [info]• May 5 [every year]: Cinco de Mayo• May 10, 2009: Mother's Day [2nd sunday in May]• May 16, 2009: Armed Forces Day [3rd saturday in May]• June 14 [every year]: Flag Day• June 21, 2009: Father's Day [3rd sunday in June]• July 26, 2009: Parents' Day [4th Sunday in July]• Sept. 13, 2009: Grandparents' Day [first sunday after Labor Day] • September 11 (9/11)[every year]: anniversary of terrorist attack on World Trade Center in 2001.• September 16 [every year]: Stepfamily Day [info 1] [info 2]• September 17 [every year]: Citizenship Day• Native American Day: 4th friday in September, celebrated (observed) many different days • October 16 [every year]: Boss's Day (National Bosses Day)• October 17, 2009: Sweetest Day [3rd saturday in Oct]• October 31 [every year]: Halloween - for costumes props decorations → click here• November 3, 2009: Election Day [first tuesday after first monday in Nov]• December 7 [every year]: Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day [details] - attacked in 1941, WWII.• December 12-19, 2009: Chanukah/Hanukkah [info]• December 26 - Jan 1 [every year]: Kwanzaa• December 31 [every year]: New Year's Eve
These and additional dates are found here:
Watching all of the current events and legislation that is being passed, I wonder if these decisions are made for the greater good at all and seems like for the minority groups...maybe just to contiue the tension with opposing worldviews.
Chi Haotian –the Vice-Chairman of China’s Military Commision to top officers
Keep in mind that China has for many years advocated deceiptful
and covert warfare against its enemies. This is their Modus Operandi. There
should be little question that a “Bird Flu” Pandemic would deeply excite them.
(Don’t forget how they have poisoned thousands of American pets and knowingly
placed lead paints on toddler’s toys.)
“Comrades, I’m very excited today, because the large-scale online survey sina.com
that was done for us showed that our next generation is quite promising and our
Party’s cause will be carried on. In answering the question, “Will you shoot at
women, children and prisoners of war,” more than 80 per cent of the respondents
answered in the affirmative, exceeding by far our expectations.
Today I’d like to focus on why we asked sina.com to conduct this online survey
among our people. My speech today is a sequel to my speech last time, during
which I started with a discussion of the issue of the three islands [Taiwan, Diaoyu
Islands and the Spratley Islands --- Ott] and mentioned that 20 years of the idyllic
theme of ‘peace and development’ had cometo an end, and concluded that
modernization under the saber is the only option for China’s next phase. I also
mentioned we have a vital stake overseas.
The central issue of this survey appears to be whether one should shoot at
women, children and prisoners of war, but its real significance goes far beyond
that. Ostensibly, our intention is mainly to figure out what the Chinese people’s
attitude towards war is: If these future soldiers do not hesitate to kill even noncombatants,
they’ll naturally be doubly ready and ruthless in killing combatants.
Therefore, the responses to the survey questions may reflect the general attitude
people have towards war……..We wanted to know: If China’s global development
will necessitate massive deaths in enemy countries, will our people endorse that
scenario? Will they be for or against it?
The fact is, our ‘development’ refers to the great revitalization of the Chinese
nation, which, of course, is not limited to the land we have now but also includes
the whole world. As everybody knows, according to the views propagated by the
Western scholars, humanity as a whole originated from one single mother in
Africa. Therefore no race can claim racial superiority. However, according to the
research conducted by most Chinese scholars, the Chinese are different from other
races on earth.
We did not originate in Africa. Instead, we originated independently in the land of China. Therefore, we can rightfully assert that we are the product of cultural roots of more than a million years, civilization and progress of more than ten thousand years, an ancient nation of five thousand years, and a single Chinese entity of two thousand years. This is the Chinese nation that calls itself ‘descendants of Yan and Huang.’
During our long history, our people have disseminated throughout the Americas
and the regions along the Pacific Rim, and they became Indians in the Americas
and the East Asian ethnic groups in the South Pacific. We all know that on
account of our national superiority, during the thriving and prosperous Tang
Dynasty our civilization was at the peak of the world. We were the centre of the
world civilization, and no other civilization in the world was comparable to ours.
Later on, because of our complacency, narrow-mindedness, and the self-enclosure
of our own country, we were surpassed by Western civilization, and the centre of
the world shifted to the West.
In reviewing history, one may ask: Will the centre of the world civilization shift
back to China? Actually, Comrade Liu Huaqing made similar points in early
1980’s Based on an historical analysis, he pointed out that the centre of world
civilization is shifting. It shifted from the East to Western Europe and later to the
United States; now it is shifting back to the East. Therefore, if we refer to the 19th
Century as the British Century and the 20th century as the American Century, then
the 21st Century will be the Chinese Century!! (Wild applause fills the
Our Chinese people are wiser than the Germans because, fundamentally, our
race is superior to theirs. As a result, we have a longer history, more people, and
larger land area. On this basis, our ancestors left us with the two most essential
heritages, which are atheism and great unity. It was Confucius, the founder of our
Chinese culture, who gave us these heritages. These two heritages determined that
we have a stronger ability to survive than the West. That is why the Chinese race
has been able to prosper for so long. We are destined ‘not to be buried by either
heaven or earth’ no matter how severe the natural, man-made, and national
disasters. This is our advantage. Take response to war as an example. The reason
that the United States remains today is that it has never seen war on its mainland.
Once its enemies aim at the mainland, the enemies would have already reached
Washington before its congress finishes debating and authorizes the president to
declare war. But for us, we don’t waste time on these trivial things.
Maybe you have now come to understand why we recently decided to further
promulgate atheism. If we let theology from the West into China and empty us
from the inside, if we let all Chinese people listen to God and follow God, who will
obediently listen to us and follow us? If the common people don’t believe Comrade
Hu Jintao is a qualified leader, begin to question his authority, and want to
monitor him, if the religious followers in our society question why we are leading
God in churches, can our Party continue to rule China??
The first pressing issue facing us is living space. This is the biggest focus of the
revitalization of the Chinese race. In my last speech, I said that the fight over basic
living resources (including land and ocean) is the source of the vast majority of
wars in history. This may change in the information age, but not fundamentally.
Our per capita resources are much less than those of Germany’s back then. In
addition, economic development in the last twenty-plus years had a negative impact,
and climates are rapidly changing for the worse. Our resources are in very short
supply. The environment is severely polluted, especially that of soil, water, and air.
Not only our ability to sustain and develop our race, but even its survival is gravely
threatened, to a degree much greater than faced Germany back then
Anybody who has been to Western countries knows that their living space is
much better than ours.
They have forests alongside the highways, while we hardly
have any trees by our streets. Their sky is often blue with white clouds, while our
sky is covered with a layer of dark haze. Their tap water is clean enough for
drinking, while even our ground water is so polluted that it can’t be drunk without
filtering. They have few people in the streets, and two or three people can occupy a
small residential building; in contrast our streets are always crawling with people,
and several people have to share one room. Many years ago, there was a book
titled Yellow Catastrophes. It said that, due to our following the American style of
consumption, our limited resources would no longer support the population and
society would collapse once our population reaches 1.3 billion. Now our
population has already exceeded this limit, and we are now relying on imports to
sustain our nation. It’s not that we haven’t paid attention to this issue. The
Ministry of Land Resources is specialized in this issue.
But we must understand that the term ‘living space’ (lebenstraum) is too closely
related to Nazi Germany. The reason we don’t want to discuss this too openly is to
avoid the West’s association of us with Nazi Germany, which could in turn
reinforce the view that China is a threat. Therefore, in our emphasis on He Xin’s
new theory, ‘Human Rights are just living rights’ we only talk about ‘living’ but
not ‘space’ so as to avoid using the term ‘living space.’ From the perspective of
history, the reason that China is faced with the issue of living space is because
Western countries have developed ahead of Eastern countries. Western countries
established colonies all around the world, therefore giving themselves an advantage
on the issue of living space. To solve this problem, we must lead the Chinese people
outside of China, so that they can develop outside of China.
Would the United States allow us to go out to gain new living space? First, if
the United States is firm in blocking us, it is hard for us to do anything significant
to Taiwan and some other countries! Second, even if we could snatch some land
from Taiwan, Vietnam, India, or even Japan, how much more living space can we
get? Very trivial! Only countries like the United States, Canada and Australia
have the vast land to serve our need for mass colonization.
Therefore, solving the ‘issue of America’ is the key to solving all other issues.
First, this makes it possible for us to have many people migrate there and even
establish another China under the same leadership of the CCP. America was
originally discovered by the ancestors of the yellow race, but Columbus gave credit
to the White race. We the descendants of the Chinese nation are ENTITLED to the
possession of the land!!! It is historical destiny that China and United States will
come into unavoidable confrontation on a narrow path and fight. In the long run,
the relationship of China and the United States is one of a life-and-death struggle.
Of course, right now it is not the time to openly break up with them yet. Our
reform and opening to the outside world still rely on their capital and technology.
We still need America. Therefore, we must do everything we can to promote our
relationship with America, learn from America in all aspects and use America as
an example to reconstruct our country.
Only by using special means to ‘clean up’ America will we be able to lead the
Chinese people there. Only by using non-destructive weapons that can kill many
people will we be able to reserve America for ourselves. There has been rapid
development of modern biological technology, and new bio weapons have been
invented one after another. Of course we have not been idle; in the past years we
have seized the opportunity to master weapons of this kind. We are capable of
achieving our purpose of ‘cleaning up’ America all of a sudden. When Comrade
Xiaoping was still with us, the Party Central Committee had the perspicacity to
make the right decision not to develop aircraft carrier groups and focused instead
on developing lethal weapons that can eliminate mass populations of the enemy
Biological weapons are unprecedented in their ruthlessness, but if the
Americans do not die then the Chinese have to die. If the Chinese people are
strapped to the present land, a total societal collapse is bound to take place.
According to the computations of the author of Yellow Peril, more than half of the
Chinese will die, and that figure would be more than 800 million people! Just after
the liberation, our yellow land supported nearly 500 million people, while today the
official figure of the population is more than 1.3 billion. This yellow land has
reached the limit of its capacity. One day, who know how soon it will come, the
great collapse will occur any time and more than half of the population will have to
It is indeed brutal to kill one or two hundred million Americans. But that is the
only path that will secure a Chinese century, a century in which the CCP leads the
world. We, as revolutionary humanitarians, do not want deaths, But if history
confronts us with a choice between deaths of Chinese and those of Americans, we’d
have to pick the latter, as, for us, it is more important to safeguard the lives of the
Chinese people and the life of our Party.
The last problem I want to talk about is of firmly seizing the preparations for
military battle. The central committee believes, as long as we resolve the United
States problem at one blow, our domestic problems will all be readily solved.
Therefore, our military battle preparation appears to aim at Taiwan, but in fact is
aimed at the United States, and the preparation is far beyond the scope of attacking
aircraft carriers or satellites. Marxism pointed out that violence is the midwife for
the birth of the new society. Therefore war is the midwife for the birth of China’s
Wednesday, June 3, 2009
June 2, 2009
A few years ago I heard various friends and acquaintances ask the piercing question: "How can God stay His hand from our America? Are we not approaching levels of sin as Sodom and Gommorah?"
I don't hear that comment any longer for it seems we are no longer protected from the national consequences of blatant sin - even the sinful choices and leadership of our President.
Just this morning I read the following account from Family Research Council where President Obama named "... Kevin Jennings, founder of the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), to be Assistant Deputy Secretary for the Office of Safe and Drug Free Schools. GLSEN is the chief national advocacy group promoting policies to force affirmation of homosexuality in schools, beginning in kindergarten. Jennings wrote the foreword for a book, "Queering Elementary Education," which among other things praises teaching masturbation to a 7-year-old girl. ..."http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=WU09F01&f=PG07J01
Secondly, earlier today, on the White House webpage we see that Mr. Obama has named June LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, AND TRANSGENDER PRIDE MONTH, 2009. See for yourself at:http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Presidential-Proclamation-LGBT-Pride-Month/
In the presidential proclamation, President Barack H. Obama states "The LGBT rights movement has achieved great progress," Obama states in the official proclamation, "but there is more to be done. LGBT youth should feel safe to learn without the fear of harassment, and LGBT families and seniors should be allowed to live their lives with dignity and respect."The proclamation, released earlier today, credits the LGBT movement with being a factor in more Americans who ascribe to those groups "living their lives openly today than ever before."
He uses the proclamation to emphasize LGBT-related initiatives that he intends to pursue in the future -- both domestically and internationally."I have joined efforts at the United Nations to decriminalize homosexuality around the world," he states. "Here at home, I continue to support measures to bring the full spectrum of equal rights to LGBT Americans."
With the efforts to push through "Hate Crimes" legislation, what happens to those who uphold the Bible, God's Holy Word?
What happens to America as President Obama leads us into the realm of the legitimization of homosexuality, lesbianism, bisexualism and transgenderism?
If he's a Christian, as he has stated, he is not unaware of God's word regarding Sodom and Gommorrah. All the more concerning having a form of knowledge but denying it is weighty business.
One oft quoted portion of Scripture down through hundreds and hundreds of years by people who honored God's Word in word and deed is taken from the wisdom book, Proverbs.
"For the fear of God is the beginning of wisdom."Proverbs 1:7
The following passage from Romans contains a clear word regarding men or women who substitute the truth for a lie.
Romans 1:21-29 "For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Claiming to be wise, they became fools, and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things.
Therefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves, because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever! Amen.
For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error.
And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done. They were filled with all manner of unrighteousness, evil, covetousness, malice. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, maliciousness."
In closing, God hates sin. He is not a toothless lion but rather a loving and Holy God who judges and will judge wickedness.
This kind of proclamation made by President Barack Obama is a proclamation that promotes and encourages wickedness.
As a Christian, I could not let this news go without expressing my horror at what he has done as the president of the United States during the "worst economic crisis in our history". I believe it is safe to add to that list "The most immoral and corrupt time in our history" as well.
Great Job Mr. Obama...what will be next, legalization of murder,other than abortions, children having sex with animals or the return to Aushwitz? Whatever it is will be no surprise after all we have seen in his first 12? days. You sir are an abomination to this country , may God's will be done in your life. I pray that Americans wake up before it is too late, or is it already?
I Peter 5:8"Be sober-minded; be watchful. Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour."
Finally, it is important to understand that although I believe this proclamation to be unacceptable, it by no means should be taken that I hate a particular group of people. As I wrote in my last post, I have a deep seated genuine concern for the behavior people are engaged in and have more of a hatred for it that than the individuals themselves. Sexual preference should be something that is meant to be private, why do the people who disagree have to be forced to accept such an agenda?
Why have all other holidays been only one day, our countries day of celebration is one day, Christmas, for a country founded on biblical principles-one day, etc yet one of the most contraversial issues in our culture today, still not recognized by the majority gets and entire month? Sometimes, as previously stated, I wonder if he and his administration desire the divide .
If Obamas plan includes for the betterment of All mankind why are the majority being ignored?
I believe we have the right to respect eachother without having to agree on sexual preferences but also have the right to free speech regarding these issues.
Tuesday, June 2, 2009
Are the lives of animals now more important than human lives? It appears that women have been given the choice to abort, should I have the choice to slaughter my own animal if I so choose? Of course I wouldn't being an animal lover myself , I am just trying to make a point.
Without being disrespectful to the cause can anyone enlighten me on why people have more reverance for animals than their own offspring?
Every month there are about 5000 babies killed in abortion clinics. 1/3rd of the next generation has been destroyed in the name of convenience which will lead to moral, ethical and economic ramifications.
I have always been a man of priorities and have always felt that human life should be one of the highest priorities. It makes perfect sense when you consider than every domestic animal needs a place to live and be loved, if we kill future owners, who will take care of future animals?
I became a Christian about 19 years ago when I realized my life was going no where and no matter how hard I tried it wasn't getting any better. I would not trade the journey for anything in the world but it is important to note that becoming a Christian did not make my life easier only better.
I became involved in current events and an activist about two years ago and haven't been the same since, another life changing moment that has been the most emotional, gut wrenching and at times, difficult time and period of growth I have ever experienced.
Last January, as I had mentioned in a previous post, I was invited to attend a pro-life memorial where I was fortunate to have met an individual that only God could have placed in my life and was unable to see it until just recently. In the beginning I thought I was put into his life, realizing now that he may have been put in mine.
Since January I have spend more time wondering about this cultural issue than anything else trying to find out if there is a way to open lines of communication, remain true to our worldview but try to communicate in a way that would appear non-combative and would seem like we actually care.
Do you suppose that Christians really hate homosexuals or do you suppose homosexuals hate Christians? WHat if the culture war was created by the media or the government as a way to to establish a smoke screen while they are keeping us busy fighting while they are up to something we may be unaware of?
After this revelation I thought long and hard and have considered attending the Boise pride event, in an effort to reach out and find out for myself if the hated really exists but wanted to see if there may be some other churches that would be willing to join me.
I can't say I was shocked to find out after several phone calls that no one would be willing to join me to spread the message. Sharing the love of Christ as we are called to do as Christians is what churches should be encouraging thier congregations to do, but instead they shyed away, in fear that it may be too political, we could get hurt or that we could gain negative media attention. What did Jesus do and how did he react?
In my perspective, this was so wrong on so many levels, specifically, serving more than one master as in Matt 6:24, serving the political realm rather than doing what Jesus has called us to, in addition to a violation of the first commandment that we shall have no other god before us and therefore not an acceptable way for Christians to live.
To bring this to a close, I have found a love like I have never imagined - not a homosexual love but an "agape love" , like Jesus loves us,or a brotherly love, a love for this individual I have never encountered before, a geniune caring for his well being. How can I be considered a "hategroup" with the way I was left to feel about someone, who may be just as lost as anyone else I know going through life trying to put together the pieces and figuring things out the best way we all know how.
If I happen to attend this event and am allowed to ( entries subject to rejection without cause) I will update with information and will pray that this will be a positive event and another life changing event in my life and hopefully those whom I come in contact with.
Prayers are requested and maybe I can find a few "BRAVE" men to attend in the hope that we can begin to change hearts and minds with love and grace without denying the truth all as Jesus did.
“In Nazi Germany, the Hitler Youth succeeded the Boy Scout movement. Hitler Youth training was militarized in comparison to the Boy Scout network, which was largely based around education. Boys aged fourteen and upwards, as well as a separate branch aged 10-14, were trained at preparatory schools to become future Nazi leaders. At its height in 1940, and after it had become mandatory to join, the Hitler Youth boasted no less than 8 million members.
“Apparently in a shift away from the traditional Boy Scouts activities of sports, camping, survival skills and team leadership, the government is now training children “to confront terrorism, illegal immigration and escalating border violence” under the banner of the Explorers program, with the aid of military-style exercises aimed at subduing insurgents.”
Barack Obama and Raila Obama (8:18 minutes)
Obama campaigns for murderer in Kenya (4 min)
Brainwash and spread propaganda using young kids (2:45)
October 10, 2008: Proof Obama backed ruthless foreign thug
It’s now June and an usurper still sits in the White House when he’s not flying around on his new toy, Air Force One. The pressure is and will continue to mount until the Obama citizenship crisis is addressed and Obama/Soetoro is exposed as a fraud and liar. Remember: it’s not just his long form birth certificate. It’s the fact that he was a dual citizen at birth and can never be constitutionally eligible to be president; the complete file here.
In the meantime, Americans better pay attention to the usurper president’s idea of justice:
Career lawyers overruled on voting case
What’s Wrong with a little Wealth Redistribution anyway? By Daniel Greenfield
Word that the Obama Administration may have used its power over Chrysler’s restructuring process to shut down dealerships whose owners donated to Republican candidates, while leaving open dealerships that donated to Obama is spreading across conservative blogs. But while this kind of abuse of government power is shocking, it really shouldn’t be.
Government is an engine of wealth redistribution, and when it gains control of businesses, it redistributes wealth in a way that benefits its supporters. That is what government always does, no matter how it disguises it.
Triangle in Anapoima Mandarino Tree Parrot Soap Opera of All Time! By Judi McLeod
Step aside, Julio Iglesias and all you other romantic Latino singers, Paco the Parrot is here.
Bogota Free Planet (BFP) promised they would record for CFP the Parrots of Anapoima belting out the haunting refrain from the song “Cucurruccu Paloma”, and that’s just what they did.
Obama Only Interested in Bailing Out Union Buddies By JB Williams
Obama is on the cusp of making American taxpayers the proud new bankrupt owners of what is now affectionately referred to as “Government Motors.”—As GM follows Chrysler into Fed forced bankruptcy, Obama’s economic guru has already worked out the details of how GM will emerge from bankruptcy court a wholly owned asset of the Fed.
Rachel Maddow destroys Obama on lying to the American people By Online
Will America Be An Accomplice to Israel’s Death? By Jerry McConnellObama has already accepted that Iran will soon have nuclear weapons
Sonia Sotomayor Supreme Court senorita: A case of unapologetic racism By Paul WilliamsStrong ties to La Raza, the Latino answer to the KKK
Quote Of The Day By Bob ParksNancy Pelosi, Every aspect of our lives must be subjected to an inventory
Is The No-VAT Diet Over? By Bob ParksPresident Obama has said the government is broke
Lawmaker Calls for ACORN Probe By Matthew VadumTwisted finances of the radical activist group ACORN
Gas Prices Soar: Media and Dems in Tank for Obama? By John LillpopEerie undoing of the law of supply and demand
Torture? Who Are They Kidding? By Alan CarubaThe willful refusal to admit that the United States and the West is at war stands in stark contrast to the Cold War
“The Great American Story” As Fig Leaf By Monica CrowleyObama attempts to cover himself regarding SCOTUS selection of Sotomayor
Torturing the Rule of Law - A Different Perspective By John BarnhartWhy I disagree with Congressman Ron Paul on this issue
Torturing the Rule of Law By Congressman Ron PaulWhy I am against water boarding
Obama Says “Now or Never” on Commie Scheme: Let’s Give NEVER a Chance, Prez! By John LillpopGovernment interference in private enterprise, support for corrupt labor unions
Stimulus and Bailout By OnlineLetter to Congressman Dr. Phil Roe
There is so much more going on in the US and all over the country now, it seems like you could stay awake 24/7 and never be close to up to par on what happens in one day and never be able to get the truth no matter how hard you look. It would appear that they are performing magic tricks or "slight of hand" that would keep the citizens concerned on some issues while they are behind the scenes doing something else that you know by now isn't in anyone's best interest but for himself and his onterage.
What really is happening? You be the judge but if you are asleep,WAKE UP!!!!!