Will China rule the US?

The following is the actual text of a speech delivered in December, 2005 by Comrade
Chi Haotian –the Vice-Chairman of China’s Military Commision to top officers
and generals.

Keep in mind that China has for many years advocated deceiptful
and covert warfare against its enemies. This is their Modus Operandi. There
should be little question that a “Bird Flu” Pandemic would deeply excite them.
(Don’t forget how they have poisoned thousands of American pets and knowingly
placed lead paints on toddler’s toys.)

“Comrades, I’m very excited today, because the large-scale online survey sina.com
that was done for us showed that our next generation is quite promising and our
Party’s cause will be carried on. In answering the question, “Will you shoot at
women, children and prisoners of war,” more than 80 per cent of the respondents
answered in the affirmative, exceeding by far our expectations.

Today I’d like to focus on why we asked sina.com to conduct this online survey
among our people. My speech today is a sequel to my speech last time, during
which I started with a discussion of the issue of the three islands [Taiwan, Diaoyu
Islands and the Spratley Islands --- Ott] and mentioned that 20 years of the idyllic
theme of ‘peace and development’ had cometo an end, and concluded that
modernization under the saber is the only option for China’s next phase. I also
mentioned we have a vital stake overseas.

The central issue of this survey appears to be whether one should shoot at
women, children and prisoners of war, but its real significance goes far beyond
that. Ostensibly, our intention is mainly to figure out what the Chinese people’s
attitude towards war is: If these future soldiers do not hesitate to kill even noncombatants,
they’ll naturally be doubly ready and ruthless in killing combatants.

Therefore, the responses to the survey questions may reflect the general attitude
people have towards war……..We wanted to know: If China’s global development
will necessitate massive deaths in enemy countries, will our people endorse that
scenario? Will they be for or against it?

The fact is, our ‘development’ refers to the great revitalization of the Chinese
nation, which, of course, is not limited to the land we have now but also includes
the whole world. As everybody knows, according to the views propagated by the
Western scholars, humanity as a whole originated from one single mother in
Africa. Therefore no race can claim racial superiority. However, according to the
research conducted by most Chinese scholars, the Chinese are different from other
races on earth.

We did not originate in Africa. Instead, we originated independently in the land of China. Therefore, we can rightfully assert that we are the product of cultural roots of more than a million years, civilization and progress of more than ten thousand years, an ancient nation of five thousand years, and a single Chinese entity of two thousand years. This is the Chinese nation that calls itself ‘descendants of Yan and Huang.’

During our long history, our people have disseminated throughout the Americas
and the regions along the Pacific Rim, and they became Indians in the Americas
and the East Asian ethnic groups in the South Pacific. We all know that on
account of our national superiority, during the thriving and prosperous Tang
Dynasty our civilization was at the peak of the world. We were the centre of the
world civilization, and no other civilization in the world was comparable to ours.
Later on, because of our complacency, narrow-mindedness, and the self-enclosure
of our own country, we were surpassed by Western civilization, and the centre of
the world shifted to the West.
In reviewing history, one may ask: Will the centre of the world civilization shift
back to China? Actually, Comrade Liu Huaqing made similar points in early
1980’s Based on an historical analysis, he pointed out that the centre of world
civilization is shifting. It shifted from the East to Western Europe and later to the
United States; now it is shifting back to the East. Therefore, if we refer to the 19th
Century as the British Century and the 20th century as the American Century, then
the 21st Century will be the Chinese Century!! (Wild applause fills the
auditorium.)

Our Chinese people are wiser than the Germans because, fundamentally, our
race is superior to theirs. As a result, we have a longer history, more people, and
larger land area. On this basis, our ancestors left us with the two most essential
heritages, which are atheism and great unity. It was Confucius, the founder of our
Chinese culture, who gave us these heritages. These two heritages determined that
we have a stronger ability to survive than the West. That is why the Chinese race
has been able to prosper for so long. We are destined ‘not to be buried by either
heaven or earth’ no matter how severe the natural, man-made, and national
disasters. This is our advantage. Take response to war as an example. The reason
that the United States remains today is that it has never seen war on its mainland.
Once its enemies aim at the mainland, the enemies would have already reached
Washington before its congress finishes debating and authorizes the president to
declare war. But for us, we don’t waste time on these trivial things.
Maybe you have now come to understand why we recently decided to further
promulgate atheism. If we let theology from the West into China and empty us
from the inside, if we let all Chinese people listen to God and follow God, who will
obediently listen to us and follow us? If the common people don’t believe Comrade
Hu Jintao is a qualified leader, begin to question his authority, and want to
monitor him, if the religious followers in our society question why we are leading
God in churches, can our Party continue to rule China??

The first pressing issue facing us is living space. This is the biggest focus of the
revitalization of the Chinese race. In my last speech, I said that the fight over basic
living resources (including land and ocean) is the source of the vast majority of
wars in history. This may change in the information age, but not fundamentally.

Our per capita resources are much less than those of Germany’s back then. In
addition, economic development in the last twenty-plus years had a negative impact,
and climates are rapidly changing for the worse. Our resources are in very short
supply. The environment is severely polluted, especially that of soil, water, and air.
Not only our ability to sustain and develop our race, but even its survival is gravely
threatened, to a degree much greater than faced Germany back then
Anybody who has been to Western countries knows that their living space is
much better than ours.

They have forests alongside the highways, while we hardly
have any trees by our streets. Their sky is often blue with white clouds, while our
sky is covered with a layer of dark haze. Their tap water is clean enough for
drinking, while even our ground water is so polluted that it can’t be drunk without
filtering. They have few people in the streets, and two or three people can occupy a
small residential building; in contrast our streets are always crawling with people,
and several people have to share one room. Many years ago, there was a book
titled Yellow Catastrophes. It said that, due to our following the American style of
consumption, our limited resources would no longer support the population and
society would collapse once our population reaches 1.3 billion. Now our
population has already exceeded this limit, and we are now relying on imports to
sustain our nation. It’s not that we haven’t paid attention to this issue. The
Ministry of Land Resources is specialized in this issue.

But we must understand that the term ‘living space’ (lebenstraum) is too closely
related to Nazi Germany. The reason we don’t want to discuss this too openly is to
avoid the West’s association of us with Nazi Germany, which could in turn
reinforce the view that China is a threat. Therefore, in our emphasis on He Xin’s
new theory, ‘Human Rights are just living rights’ we only talk about ‘living’ but
not ‘space’ so as to avoid using the term ‘living space.’ From the perspective of
history, the reason that China is faced with the issue of living space is because
Western countries have developed ahead of Eastern countries. Western countries
established colonies all around the world, therefore giving themselves an advantage
on the issue of living space. To solve this problem, we must lead the Chinese people
outside of China, so that they can develop outside of China.

Would the United States allow us to go out to gain new living space? First, if
the United States is firm in blocking us, it is hard for us to do anything significant
to Taiwan and some other countries! Second, even if we could snatch some land
from Taiwan, Vietnam, India, or even Japan, how much more living space can we
get? Very trivial! Only countries like the United States, Canada and Australia
have the vast land to serve our need for mass colonization.

Therefore, solving the ‘issue of America’ is the key to solving all other issues.
First, this makes it possible for us to have many people migrate there and even
establish another China under the same leadership of the CCP. America was
originally discovered by the ancestors of the yellow race, but Columbus gave credit
to the White race. We the descendants of the Chinese nation are ENTITLED to the
possession of the land!!! It is historical destiny that China and United States will
come into unavoidable confrontation on a narrow path and fight. In the long run,
the relationship of China and the United States is one of a life-and-death struggle.

Of course, right now it is not the time to openly break up with them yet. Our
reform and opening to the outside world still rely on their capital and technology.
We still need America. Therefore, we must do everything we can to promote our
relationship with America, learn from America in all aspects and use America as
an example to reconstruct our country.

Only by using special means to ‘clean up’ America will we be able to lead the
Chinese people there. Only by using non-destructive weapons that can kill many
people will we be able to reserve America for ourselves. There has been rapid
development of modern biological technology, and new bio weapons have been
invented one after another. Of course we have not been idle; in the past years we
have seized the opportunity to master weapons of this kind. We are capable of
achieving our purpose of ‘cleaning up’ America all of a sudden. When Comrade
Xiaoping was still with us, the Party Central Committee had the perspicacity to
make the right decision not to develop aircraft carrier groups and focused instead
on developing lethal weapons that can eliminate mass populations of the enemy
country.

Biological weapons are unprecedented in their ruthlessness, but if the
Americans do not die then the Chinese have to die. If the Chinese people are
strapped to the present land, a total societal collapse is bound to take place.
According to the computations of the author of Yellow Peril, more than half of the
Chinese will die, and that figure would be more than 800 million people! Just after
the liberation, our yellow land supported nearly 500 million people, while today the
official figure of the population is more than 1.3 billion. This yellow land has
reached the limit of its capacity. One day, who know how soon it will come, the
great collapse will occur any time and more than half of the population will have to
go.

It is indeed brutal to kill one or two hundred million Americans. But that is the
only path that will secure a Chinese century, a century in which the CCP leads the
world. We, as revolutionary humanitarians, do not want deaths, But if history
confronts us with a choice between deaths of Chinese and those of Americans, we’d
have to pick the latter, as, for us, it is more important to safeguard the lives of the
Chinese people and the life of our Party.

The last problem I want to talk about is of firmly seizing the preparations for
military battle. The central committee believes, as long as we resolve the United
States problem at one blow, our domestic problems will all be readily solved.
Therefore, our military battle preparation appears to aim at Taiwan, but in fact is
aimed at the United States, and the preparation is far beyond the scope of attacking
aircraft carriers or satellites. Marxism pointed out that violence is the midwife for
the birth of the new society. Therefore war is the midwife for the birth of China’s
century.”