Friday, March 20, 2009

Are Republicans really stupid?

I am not a Republican but I shake my head as I watch the who parties bash eachother on who has more intelligence.It seems easy for people these days to push blame on others and remain in complete denial themselves and not have any factual basis for feeling the way they do... they just feel this way. Watch the video below and see for yourself. This is a classic example of how I feel many who voted for Obama feel. They do not know why they voted for him, they just did.

Heres another one, where there is no factual information regarding or communicating how stupid Republicans are, instead they produce a redundant video that is impossible to finish viewing because it has no intellectual backing.

Here's one that at least gives some idea of why they are hated. I get it...republicans are hated because they cannot open a closed ( locked) door, have minor innacuracies in their speech or show compassion?

or one more ( language warning) :
Stupid things that Republicans say (the ignorance here is overwhelming)

This woman speaks about herself, apparently attempting to obtain a gender procedure, for a few minutes before she shares her thoughts about republicans but again no factual component here either.According to the link above and other websites I have found these are other answers why they feel as they do:

"why republicans suck "
1- everything must be approved by the bible
2-george bush
3-w.a.s.p.s are treated first class while others are discriminated cause of their(the reps.) ----- religious views
4-most are racist (lets be honest here.. they are)
5-and homophobic
6-ronald reagan
7-they support a pointless wars
8- most are p---ks!
9-support arctic drilling
10- dont give a s--t about people or environment, just "god" and money
11-mitt romney
12-are paranoid that anyone different is evil and will try to kill us
13-dick cheney
14-lead to the shitty economic crisis were in
15-hate abortion
16 - thinks gays are of the devil
17- alan keyes also sucks

Let us look closely to the statements presented line by line:

1- America founded on Christian principles and law was created from biblical law (Is that a bad thing?) Biblical priciples are what has kept this the most morally and ethiccally strong country in the world...We are " The beacon on the hill"

2-George Bush, hmm, seems specific doesn't it? Like we haven't had bad democratic presidents before? Many republicans also regretted some of the decisions that he made. He, toward the end of his presidency acted much like a a democratic president in many of his economic issues as well as foreign policies. If the war in Iraq is what they truly hate about Bush, it would help them to know that the democratic congress supported the invasion on Iraq.
From Clinton himself:

3- WASPS. I have no idea what this refers to but I can tell you that the democrats are big on using verbiage like "discrimination" every time they can only because they must not understand the ideology. With the Socialistic mindset, until everyone is like everyone else, which will never happen ,discrimination will be one of thieir most widely used words.

4- Most a rascist? Another word in which no explanation is given. If this term relates to the transgender group or the gay/lesbian community, they need to be informed that they are not a "race". Specifics would be needed to support this statement. If racist means saying things in opposition to someone elses lifestyle, exercising "free speech, our first amendment right, are they not guilty as well? Are we, at some point, in violation of our rights here by speaking in opposition?Not under the Constitution!

5-homophobic-"Phobic" coming from a medical term meaning "IC" "pertaining to" and "phob" "infear of" I can tell you Republicans and conservatives are not scared of Homosexuals. This is another gross misuse of the english language to mean something that is innaccurate. I and others do not exept this lifestyle and I, they resent the fact that they are being "forced" to have this crammed down their throats. They are more angry than scared. They are as angry about having this lifestyle they consider unacceptible forced upon them as you are about them not accepting it. How is that for a quagmire?

6- Ronald Reagan, no specif reason given to dislike him so I will guess, the most patriotic, moral, God fearing president we have had in the past 100 years? I have difficulty understanding how anyone could not like a man with this stature, unless you do like like what he belived in..America, God, humility,Fellow Americans and their inate ability to rise against opposition and our resolve, our history and his unique ability to put it all together and make it happen, unlike any other president including the present administration will ever be able to do.

7-Support "pointless wars. " As Clinton in his finest hour would say "It depends on what the meaning of pointless is..." This statement written by a true democrat simply because they oppose ANY war. To someone like this, war has never been worth fighting for...even if our freedom depended on it. The meaning behind a statement like this would once have been considered "treason", but our liberals have decided that this word may have been too "hateful" so they either got rid of it or changed it's meaning.

8-Profanity is another signature mark of a group that calls the it's oppostiton "hate groups". While I try to retain my dignity,I wouldn't even dignify a response here, the complex volcabulary exudes intelligence here.

9-"Drill baby drill", Republicans suck because they want to drill in the Arctic? What would this group know about drilling in the Arctic anyway? Has anyone seen the land there? Has anyone else come up with a more cost effective strategy to end our foreign oil dependency other than using our food for fuel driving up the cost of food or creating environmental scenarios that create massive debt and an enormous "black hole" of spending? Statements like these need to be backed with facts not feelings.

10-Don't care about people, just God and money? Tell me who it is again that voted for Obama as the president? The one who was voted in to fix the economy( money)? It was said if the economy was not in the shape it is that Obama would never have won. How is it that republicans care less about people than Democrats again? Is it that Democrats are the majority of pro-abortion voters, the ones whom terminate pregnancies of baby humans (people)? Arent the Democrats the ones who are voting socialism" spreading the weaalth", the ones who want fto take from those who have? The ones that want the government programs, to raise taxes, to nationalize healthcare, to tax everything a person makes and give the governement control of our future?
Isn't it the democrats who have tripled the national deficit in 6 weeks and have placed an irreversable debt upon our future generations? Not care about people? I would rather give my children life and freedom without debt than kill them and if they did live to tax their children!!!These are just a few examples. I will agree with one part of this statement...I as a trus conservative and many republicans do Love God. We have reverance for the one and only Almighty God whose providence and protection has kept this coutry safe and prosperous since the beginning...God help us as he lifts His almighty hand away from his people. We are seeing the decline of moral society and an irreverible economic collapse as a result.

11-Another name with no credible facts on why he is disliked other than his moral, religious background and his intelligence as a "free market capitalist" and anti-socialist.

12-will not dignify a response to such a rant.
14-It is necesssary to understand how this crisis began. Democratic congress was the problem. Although it is convenient to blame Bush, as he was part of the problem,Bush had a democratic congress that could veto any legislation that he could have proposed to do anything good, if he wanted to. Don't you think it is time to search for facts and be accountable for the mistakes that have been made? On both sides? Remember during the Bush administration the Dow was at record high historical levels. Obama has tripled the deficit in 6 weeks as well as dropped the Dow to levels no seen since 1980 or so. It is also important to know that according to the Constitution the president is outside his jurisdiction to fix anything. he shall be the commander of the Military and of the states militias, to deal in foreign affairs and grant pardons and make treaties WITH THE CONSENT OF CONGRESS!! Read article 2 sec.2 of your Constitution.

15-I will admit , I do believe they DO hate Abortion, I know I do. More accurately put, according to "Politico" magazine, there actually are only 60% of republicans that are pro-life, so again your statement needs further research. Why is hating the murder of unborn babies a bad thing? One thing that may need consideration is that you needed to be born to hate abortion. Aren't you glad you were given life? Why wuld you deny that from someone else? It isn't the babies fault. I think this subject is as contraversial as it is because deep down everyione knows it is wrong.

16--I would challenge anyone to find proof that Republicans think that Gays are the devil. It is also important to know, which you obviously do not, that the "Log cabin republicans" are the largest, most wellfunded political group of homosexuals, so the acusation about republicans hating gays really carries no credibility. What you may be referring to is that the Christian conservative republicans who are pro-life, pro-family and pro-bible and pro-America.

17-Another name...searching for republican names...any name will do... I actually know him personally and I can tell you he does not.

After taking the time to summarize the differences between the two parties using this rant platform as a model, I realized that there is really no way to cahnge anyones preset suppositions. I think alot about how a bridge can be created between these two different ideologies and I have yet to find a way. In order for this bridge to be made, both sides must be willing to do the research and separate the truth from the emotion and the manipulation and the "feelings" part of the puzzle and get to the root of the issues. As I have written before, through history two things have happened, a complete breadown of society or a "great awakening". We are at the apex of the "cultural divide" no one willing to listen to the other and no one willing to back down.

Looking outside it is pretty apparent which direction we are headed as a society. Obama won't save us, Bush won't save us, Pelosi, Reid, Bernanke and Geithner won't save us. There is only one who saves, it is Christ himself.

Thursday, March 19, 2009

Why does mainstream media not cover stories like this?

Are people more interested in Brittany Spears and the new camaro to understand the issues or is the mainstream media keeping us in the dark like mushrooms?
Below are the articles around the country for just today!!!

News just for March 18. Do you still believe the mainstream media is looking out for the listeners?

Lose Your Property for Growing Food?

The Future of Food – HOLLY NOTE: We posted this video a year ago and if you missed it, after reading the Story of the Day, this is mandatory viewing. I only post this kind of comment about once a year. Monsanto is a life-sucking, creeping cancer.

Myths and Facts: HR 875 - The Food Safety Modernization Act

Response to "Myths and Facts H.R. 875 – The Food Safety Modernization Act"

Lines Grow at Food Bank

Government Launches Bid to Allay Fears Over GM Food

Fact File on GM Crops

US Rural Economy Holds Fast in Recession

Commerce Pick Tied to China Cash

ACORN to Play Role in 2010 Census

More Feds to Combat Border Violence with Mexico

3rd Earthquake Reported in Oklahoma

Quake Rocks Melbourne for Second Time in 2 Weeks

Underwater Volcano Erupts off Tonga Coast, 'Spectacular' – pics

240,500 Killed in Disasters Last Year, Study

Our Planet Gets Close Shave

Fury as Shell Cuts Back on Renewable Energy

U.S. May Widen Strikes in Pakistan

Sources: US to Sign UN Gay Rights Declaration

Israel Could Attack Iran With Missiles

Reports: Russia Confirms Iran Missile Contract

Medvedev Announces Plan to Rearm Russia

Kremlin to Pitch New GLOBAL Currency at G20

One-World Currency Emerges ... Again

How the Top 400 Banks in U.S. Fared in 2008

Livid Democrats Demand AIG Return Bailout Bonuses

UK Scraps Plan for 'Big Brother' Database

'I Fear a Civil War'

Did Obama Allow Human Cloning?

Green Tea, Mushrooms Cut Breast Cancer Risk: Study

Health Care Overhaul May Cost About $1.5 Trillion

The AIG Outrage: The Government Shouldn’t Run Anything, Because It Cannot Run Anything.

Gas Tax Hike Looks Good to GM Chief

Hearts of Galaxies Close in for Cosmic Train Wreck

Pupils Foam at Mouth, Collapse at School

Polar Bears at Risk, Climate Deal Needed: Norway

Montserrat Frog is Latest Victim of Lethal Fungus Sweeping the World

The Orange Tree Is Texting -- Again

Too funny not to post!!!

An Israeli doctor said to a medical conference, "Medicine in my country is so advanced we can take a kidney out of one person, put it into another and have him looking for work in six weeks!"

The German doctor stood up and said, medicine in my county is so advanced, we can take a lung out of one person and put it into another and have him looking for work on 4 weeks"

The Russian doctor got up and said "My country is even more advanced, we can remove half a heart from one person, put it into another and have them both looking for work in just 2 weeks!"

Not to be outdone, the American doctor stood up and addressed the conference, "Well" he said "My country is so far advanced in medicine, we can take an Axxhole out of Chicago , put him in the White House, and have half the country looking for work in 24 hours!"

Boise Tea parties

We joined forces with local patriots to gather in a patriotic demonstration to send a message to our fellow citizens who may be unaware of the present dangers within our country and to the government who does that we will no longer sit on the sidelines while our country is taken hostage by Communistic oligarchs.

The links for the Boise tea party videos are Here:

Listen to my interview with a guy running for governnor in Boise???
America wasnt founded as a Republic??? "It was founded as a democracy with true and equal stations...???"
Every American needs to hear this...another man who knows nothing of history and makes every attempt to BS you into thinking he does. Can you spot a liar? check out the 2:17 mark and see if you can?

Other Boise Tea party videos:

websites of note to get involved:

Or for more information on how to become more involved, serious inquiries only, please feel free to leave a comment.

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

US to sign United Nations "gay rights" declaration

We are so out of control as a country morally, spiritually, unlawfully, I am increasingly convinced that one hand no longer knows what the other one is doing by our government or by the individual citizens of this country, or so it would appear.

Our laws have become so inconsistent and now differ according to what one believes that it should be impossible to impose a descent law and have it respected much less followed without manipiulation.

It is no secret I was and am still against prop 8 and any other legislation that would further the GLBT agenda. It does not mean I hate these people, I just disagree with what they stand for...Just as they disagree for what I stand for. I will say that I DO hate the fact that they feel it is acceptable to silence the opposition through unlawful, unconstitutional means and to violate the morality and integrity of our legal system and their fellow citizens.

Our first amendment right was not written to have men prance around like women or vice versa and spew hateful and sometimes vile speech while in many cases performing lewd acts in the streets across the country to those who do not believe as they do... passing laws to make this kind of behavior aceptable...Now the "Circus Obama administration" will sign into law that speaking against the GLBT is unlawful?

Where is our freedom of speech now? Who has the freedom of speech? The small percentage of followers of this organization? Shouldn't it be for all citizens? This is so wrong on so many levels I am beside myself. A few examples are that, as I have said over and over,

It is unlawful, unbiblical( for those who believe...still the majority in this country by the way, proven by passage of amendments like prop 8), immoral and unnatural. In addition this will give credibility ( so they think) to promote an agenda that caters to the 1% of these followers while violationg the free speech, beliefs and moral obligation we have to eachother as citizens as the majority. This is "Forced indocrination!"

My rhetorical question is now that this declaration is in place and we are no longer allowed to speak against the GLBT...why should they continued to be allowed to stalk, ridicule, beat, expose personal information, post adresses on the internet and discriminate their opposition?

This is another instance in which we will become more and more divided until we are taking it to the streets in an all out side already is...remember the 90 days of protest in the passage of prop 8? Still those in oppostion respectfully stand there in amazement at the behavior that is being represented. Our country hasn't seen anything yet.

The followers promote and support the GLBT also promote the idea of giving aid to special interest while violating our state and federal laws to obtain their goal without regard or respect for their neighbors, friends, family members of which believe differently that they do.

The fact that the Obama administration can impose such a declaration and "force the individual states if another confirmation of the denial of "states rights" supported by the 10th amendment of the Constitution.

I feel it necessary to make myself clear here...If you are a homosexual, lesbian etc, that is your choice, just as my choice is to remain a heterosexual. I do not take my heterosexuality to the streets in protest, break laws, violate constitutions or deny moral, natural, civil and biblical law. I do not or will not violate your "God given rights" and prefer that you respect mine. In a "nutshell"...please do not "force" me to accept something I choose not to. Our rights strictly prohibit this.

The article can be found here:

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

Equal rights denial to the GLBT continued...

I posted a response to an article I read in the Boise Weekly several weeks ago and wanted to share the response from a reader that replied to mine.


My intention of including this response is in hopes that I may have, in some way, clarified some of the confusion in the culture today and help those who may not have understood see it from a different perspective. I wouldn't suppose it would make me look any more respectful but it is definitely an attempt.

The main question in a previous post was " Why is it that people are not willing to accept them as equal to give them equal rights. ( remember it isn't that I do not believe they are not equal as human beings) and "Why is living togehter not viewed the same way as the GLBT?"

I wrote:

"As far as I know, Fornication is still against the law in Idaho, just not enforced, and Idaho is a right-to-work state."

Here is an example:

So if your employer was, say, the owner of a Christian bookstore, he may well have standards he would expect employees to meet and could base employment decisions on whether his staff was willing to abide by those standards. He’d be justified in doing so because there are a certain of values he wants his employees to represent.

Beyond that, homosexual sex is non-normative. The human body wasn’t designed – whether by evolution or God, it doesn’t matter – for that kind of sexual expression. It is inherently dangerous, risky and unhealthy. That’s why, for example, a recent study by the World Health Organization reported that gay males are 45 times more likely to come down with AIDS than straights for behavioral reasons. It’s more dangerous than doing intravenous drug, which certainly, for instance, would put an employer’s ability to qualify for group health insurance for his employees at risk.

Do you think an employer should be allowed to release a drug addict from employment. If you yes, then aren't you in essence accepting that unhealthy and destructive behaviors are legitimate causes of concern for employers?

I hope I am not straying off the subject here, this is a pretty comprehensive subject. BTW It is really important that you understand I have more concern than anger about all of these issues, as I am sure you do as well. I still am wondering which rights, specifically you are concerned about that are being denied considered "equal rights?"

I continued:

I believe this country, since the beginning, has been ordained by God, we have adopted the biblical standard to lay out the boundaries of right and wrong, to lay a foundation, a Standard for all humanity to abide by. This is where I believe the problem lays.

It is the standard that prevents polygamy,bestiality, incest etc. In my conversations I have found that people with the liberal ideology believe that "if two people are in love it should be accepted." I disagree and feel that it violates the "standard."

For example, should polygamy be allowed if they love each other? What about incest? If a mother loves his son should they be able to get married? Should a father be able to marry his daughter if they feel they are in love? Should human beings be able to marry and have sex with animals? Before you get offended, hear me out...I will use America as a timeline although you can pick which timeline in history you wish.

Two hundred years ago, our founding fathers stressed moral discipline, things related to marriage were strictly between a man and woman. It has only been in the last 50 years where people have tried to blur the moral boundaries. My point is if homosexual behavior was unacceptable then and it is acceptable now then what is to say that bestiality will not become acceptable in 50 more. A far stretch? maybe so but I think the moral decline we have made in the last 50 years would have been quite a stretch for our founding fathers as well.

Biblically speaking, lifestyles like living together would be considered immoral but socially not so much because our continual moral decline as a country and the SLOW progressive nature of this lifestyle.It is also important to understand that living together does not violate natural law. I lived this way for many years as well so don't think I am using you as a target. It was only when I came to know Christ that my life changed.( don't think it is any is harder but it becomes more important to stay the course knowing the consequences for those that know God's desire for us)

I mentioned "force" in the previous email, in addition I would like to add the issue of pride and the 13-15 amendments.
If the LBGT knew the majority was not in favor of this, why would they overule amendments, have "pride parades" in many instances have open and gay sex in the public streets across the country?( I don't recall hetero parades.) Why is it being forcefed to our children in public schools? Remember, this is a minority! If the minority gains ground in society it is called aid to "special interest" especially if the majority votes in the appropriate constitutional amendment process. Passed amendments are not to be overturned unless the amendment is voted on, by the people and passes.

It appeaers that this article pretty well exposes a perspective on the agenda at hand.

The other issue that is misunderstood or manipulated is the use of the 13,14 and 15 amendment to support GLBT and /or abortion. It is clear for anyone who reads these amendments to know this was about granting freedom to the slaves...nothing else, remember, at that time Atheism was against the law and we were still a country that believed in a "moral standard."

It is important that we undrestand eachother and understand that emails, in my opinion can get misunderstood. I must be clear here, I am not angry as I write, this happens to be such a "loaded, contraversial topic" I do not want you to think I have gone on a rant...Sometimes I think dialogue between two ideologies, such as ours, is what is needed to help understand eachother as a whole, which is my desire.

I am no different than any other American in that I believe in equal rights among men, I believe in honor, justice, our country and am proud of our nation of laws for which we have fought to uphold. I stand against majority rule, oligarchy, communism, oppression, socialism ( big government) and the denial of people to express their right to freedom...unless it happens to trample on someone elses this is considered by our founders to be a violation of our "personal liberty."

We are a nation of MORAL laws, which must be upheld, if these laws are violated then individual liberty is also violated and therefore not a foundational principle and not part of our God given right ( not government or constitution given) to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

Do you feel after watching the video and veiwing picturesand reading articles located from the links below that this does not violate those liberties?

Founders and education

I am presently in several battles with my local school district about innaccuracies regarding material our children are being taught.

The issues I am dealing with presently are:

1. "Some of our founders and early presidents were homosexuals"
2. "Evolution is a fact, I do not care what religion you are...There has been confirmed DNA samples taken from apes and humans and they were found to be identical..."

I found it interesting that people who know little or nothing about history, or science, apparently, have the authority to teach such innacurate information even having the luxury to spend our tax payer dollars to do it.

John Adams said: "Our Constitution was written for a moral and religious people..."

Benjamin Rush said: " I beg leave to remark that the only foundation for a useful education in a republic is to be laid on the foundation of religion, without it [religion] there can be no virtue, without virtue no liberty, and liberty is the object and life of all republican governments" " but the religion I mean is to recommend is that of the new terstement"

A Christian cannot fail of being a republican,,,for every precept of the gosspel teaches those a degree of humility, self-denial, and brotherly kindness..."

A Christian cannot fail of being useful to the republic for his religion teaches him that " no man liveth for himself"

"A great example amongst all powers is that of Christendom"

In thoughts of secular education:

" It would not seem practical to teach...appreciation of the arts if we are to forbid exposure of youth to any religious influences, music without sacred music, architecture without cathedral, or painting without "scriptural themes even from a secualr point of view."

Our founding fathers knew as Hitler, Stalin, Marx and others that He who controls the children , controls the future.

Don't you think it's time to wake up and realize how far we have fallen away from our countries foundations. I guess if we are a country that no longer desires to be a Godly, brotherly, free country, giving into lusts of the flesh, immorality, deceit, murder, selfishness, I can try to understand it but can we at least not deny what we once were...a Chrsitian nation, founded on biblical principles?

More on "tolerance"

We hear so much about how tolerant America is and that "It was always meant to be that way, That was one of our founding principles. As I have written in previous posts, the word "tolerance" has been changed from it's original meaning and become accepted to encompass whatever anyone would like to include within it's definition. Americans have become ignorant of our english language in addition to science and history.

In the 1840's into the 1900's Non-believers were forbade to obtain citizenship because they did not believe in God, they were not allowed to give testimony in court, access schools, marry other races or receive a certification of residency and also required to pay a special tax.

How tolerant are we?
Websters 1828 dictionary defines "religion" as " belief in a being and perfections of God"
Today's dictionary defines religion as " any specific system of belief" or 'state of mind or way of life."

It is comparisons like this that clearly expose the transition our country has made, we have and are becoming a society where everything is relative, where nothing is as concrete as it once was, therefore making truth, and fact much more difficult for one to obtain.

With these transitions everything has become acceptable and it will continue to distinguish the boundaries of law redering it meaningless.

Happy St. Patricks day

In this world of increasing anti-christian sentiments, promoting the lie of separation of church and state, and people actually believing it, another example of Christianity is celebrated in America.

St. Patrick was sold as a slave by the Druids who practiced animal sacrifices and removed fromIreland and herded animals until he escaped.Later in his life he had returned to confront the Druids to teach them about the Trinity using a three -leaf clover.

He since had founded 300 churches and baptised 120,ooo people. He writes:

"Patrick the sinner,an unlearned man to be sure, none should ever say it was my ignorance that accomplished anything small, it was a gift from God."

Friday, March 13, 2009

The American deception

If there is an awakening in America it seems to be a slow process. The people are still so consumed with the political diversion without looking at the bigger picture. I admit for a time I was swayed by the policial rhetoric but am becoming increasingly more aware of the global agena.

People who do not take the time to understand would consider this conspiracy theory but once the time is taken to look at the facts and take the time to do the research and compare what you read to what is happening outside it becomes quite clear something is seriously wrong.

Alex Jones has created many documentaries relating to these "conspiracy theory" topics but this one by far encompasses the most complete spectrum, in detail, revealing the complexity that is so unbelieveable one could only deny it because of it's sheer magnitude.

Please consider viewing this video, it is almost two hours but I find it absolutely necessary for every American.

Please do not be offended at the title if you happen to favor Obama, this also includes BUsh, Cheney, and other past presidents and how they are all part of a bigger plan.

I prefer to call it the Deception of America

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Breakfast followed by Tea

Saturday was a day in which began with a leadership prayer breakfast. Many of the Christian who's who in local politics were there to help lift one another up as we collectively pray for our nation. It was a time that many believe is much needed. The title of the breakfast appropriately tagged with the scripture:

2 Chronicles 7:14 (King James Version)
14If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.

After returning home to pick up my son, I had found out that his cousin came over for awhile and they were hanging out together. As promised, I told him I was there to go to the Boise Tea Party when he asked me if his cousin could go to. My son is familiar with public demonstrations and has a fairly good idea what to expect and was informing his cousin in all that would be possible during our demonstration.

We arrived at the location only to find much less in the way of demonstrators than I had anticipated after all it was cold outside and what could be more important than staying warm while our country is being given over to the "Socialism ideology" by the ignorant minority who claims that "WE" are the ones who are not educated.

I must admit, although the group of people was not as large as I had hoped, I hadn't seen patriotism like this in years, well since 9-11 when the flags came out on every car and for a brief moment we realized we may have needed Gods's help.

Signs held by fellow Americans, young and old. Signs like "End the Fed", "big government is Socialism", "One nation under God" and signs apparently done by the children themselves that read" Stay out of my piggybank" or "My pay do I not have a say?" When asking several of these children why they were here they said "because my family teaches me about what is happening". They appear to be far more educated than many adults I know.

The thing I found most disturbing was the amount of people who yelled profanity, gave us "The finger" and other interesting gestures to me snubbing their nose at the very concept of what they practice... the freedom that has been bought and payed for by the veterans who gave their life for them, those who had a reverance for our country, Almighty God and the country "for which it stands".

If I were ever at a moment in my life where I would allow myself to lose control, this may have been that time.

This country is nothing as it were nor will it ever be again unless God rattles the cage of HIs inhabitants on this earth. The continued disrespect for eachother only in my eyes getting worse by the day but the problem being that we as a society have become so numb we do not see the moral decline because it has been rather slow and progressive and we have become so focused on "me" , "what's in it for me".

It is my opinion, with what kind of "Change" I have seen in our administrations first 50 days is that we will soon be at a point where we will no longer be able to see where we came from in order to go back if that ever became the desire of the people.(great awakening)

The Tea party was a patriotic demonstration by a group of patriotic Americans who have awakened to the fact that we are going down with the ship unless we do something.

Civil unrest, peaceful demonstrations will continue and begin to spiral out of control and become more violent until our country is in complete chaos or until this present administration realizes that his position is to represent "the people".

To those whom have ushered in the "Change" I hope you are ready for what youv'e started, afterall this has happened all through history, if they read there history they may have been able to divert what assuredly looms ahead.

for more information please go to :

Sunday, March 8, 2009

Could Thomas Jefferson tell the future?

The most favorite so called "Atheist" president we have ever had. Those who believe this will probably also find it difficult to believe that Thomas Jefferson may have had a divine ability to fortell the future.

In light of our present economic crisis do you suppose he may have? He quotes:

"When we get piled upon one another in large cities, as in Europe, we shall become as corrupt as Europe ."
Thomas Jefferson

"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not."
Thomas Jefferson

"It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it goes. A principle which if acted on would save one-half the wars of the world. "
Thomas Jefferson

"I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them."
Thomas Jefferson

"My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government. "
Thomas Jefferson

"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms."
Thomas Jefferson

"The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government. "
Thomas Jefferson

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
Thomas Jefferson

and the most Interesting Quote for our time:
Thomas Jefferson said in 1802:

'I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.

People tell me that the documents that were written by our founders are old and out of date...Does it really seem that way to you?

Saturday, March 7, 2009

Atheist group places billboard in Boise

Iam truly dissappointed at the utter ignorance of the people in this state and others around this country to allow such a group to disrespect our history as a nation and the people who fought for their religious freedom UNDER GOD, to publically deny his very existence even though proof of it is everywhere! The ignornace of this group and what they believe is so obvious if one would just look.
If this group felt like it was their right under the first amendment under "free speech" they are wrong, or were according to our founding fathers. The Supreme court in 1798 not only recognized America as a Christian nation but threw out court cases and denied the testimony of an Atheist simply because He would not acknowledge faith in God,in addition, the Supreme court also had quoted that they were suprised at his lack of acknowledgement and that they never knew someone who didn't believe in God.
If one has ever read the first amendment they would also realize that it was a "freedom OF religion" NOT "freedom FROM religion". What makes this rather funny is that if they truly stand for freedom from religion then someone ought to tell them that in 1961 (Torcaso v. Watkins)The Supreme court declared that Atheism along with "Secular humanism" were both religions!
The more someone looked into the ideology of Atheism the more they would see that nothing they believe has anything credible to sustantiate it.
I am not saying they do not have the right to believe as they do, I just don't believe that they have the right to post sacreligious rhetoric in a country founded on the principles of Jesus Christ.
As America stands today, we have become completely ignorant of our history, instead ,professing to the poison of "tolerance" and "diversity" to excelerate the moral decline of this country.

Friday, March 6, 2009

What is "Hate", who "hates" who?

I struggle with the word "hate" so much in my daily life because I, as a man of God, am called to preach the truth in love and to tell people about the good news of Christ. I would like to not only believe I have a heart for people but for them to see that I have the heart for them as well because without them seeing it my mission is meaningless.

I had a conference last year where we had several pastors come from around the country to preach the gospel message and the continuity of this message on our society- politically, economically and morally.

Scott Lively was one of the speakers at this conference. His expertise created some opposition in protest but only because I believe that no one cared or took the time to understand his position, his tireless effort and reasearch to claim this expertise and the lack of knowledge of the people in opposition on the true facts of this issue claming it as heresy.I found an essay worth sharing that may shed some light on the dilemma that faces Christians as they try to do change hearts and minds for Christ as He has called us to. He writes:

Is Hating "Haters" Hateful?Essay on the double standard being used by the Left in the public debate on homosexuality.

Hate carries a negative connotation in the world today. No one wants to be called a hater, especially Christians. Homosexuals are especially fond of calling people haters. They even invented the word "homophobia", which means hate and fear of homosexuals, envisaged as a mental illness (a phobia is an anxiety disorder). I hate being called a homophobe. It has such an ugly connotation.

Its especially unpleasant because, as a Christian, I’m supposed to have a reputation for loving people, not hating them. So I’ve worked really hard over the years to try to get the homosexuals to stop calling me a homophobe. I’ve pointed out the difference between hating people and hating their behavior (loving the sinner but hating the sin- not a biblical phrse, by the way). They hated that.

Then I tried “walking my talk” by taking an ex-”gay” man who was dying of AIDS into my family. My wife and I and our children loved and cared for him during the last year of his life. They hated that even more.

Then I began asking for guidance from homosexuals themselves: “Tell me, where is the line between homophobia and acceptable opposition to homosexuality?” I asked.

“What if I just agree with the Bible that homosexuality is a sin no worse than any other sex outside of marriage?” “No, that‘s homophobic,” they replied. “Suppose I talk only about the proven medical hazards of gay sex and try to discourage people from hurting themselves?“ “No, you can’t do that,” they said. “How about if I say that homosexuals have the option to change if they choose?” “Ridiculous” they answered. “Maybe I could just be completely positive, say nothing about homosexuality, and focus only on promoting the natural family and traditional marriage?” “That’s really hateful,” they replied.

After I while, I realized that the only way I could get them to stop calling me a homophobe was to start agreeing with them about everything. But here’s my dilemma: I honestly believe the Bible which says that homosexuality is wrong and harmful and that all sex belongs within marriage. I’ve also read the professional studies and know that “gay” sex hurts people because it goes against the design of their bodies. And I’m friends with a number of former homosexuals who are now married and living heterosexual lives. Do I have to give up my religion? Ignore scientific facts? Betray my friends? Is that the only way to avoid being called a hater and a homophobe? There’s no escape.

A homophobe is anyone who, for any reason, disapproves of homosexuality in any way, shape, manner, form or degree. This leaves me with just two choices: agree that everything about homosexuality is natural, normal, healthy, moral and worthy to be celebrated OR be labeled as a mentally ill, hate-filled bigot.

Am I wrong? Is there any way to openly disapprove of homosexuality without being a homophobe? “Gay” leaders, please set me straight on this. Because if I’m right, that means the “gay agenda” is to stop everyone from following the Bible regarding sexual matters. It is, after all, their stated goal to “stamp out homophobia.” No more religious freedom. It’s also to suppress scientific research that has reached conclusions they don’t like, especially if it helps people to change their homosexual orientation back to a heterosexual one (ask the doctors and scientists at what they’ve had to endure).

If it discourages homosexuality, even by implication, it’s homophobic and can‘t be used. There’s a queer reasoning behind all of this. Homosexuals call me names like bigot and homophobe, condemn my religion, mock my rational conclusions about social issues, impugn my motives, display intense hostility toward my actions, and curse my very existence, all under the justification that I’m a “hater.” But if I’m a “hater” for civilly opposing what they do, why aren’t they haters for uncivilly opposing what I do?

Such a double standard, in the context of a public debate on “civil rights,” is not just hypocritical, it is surreal. I admit I have some hate. I hate watching people kill themselves with preventable diseases like AIDS. I hate seeing children being steered toward unhealthy lifestyles. I hate having my pro-family views distorted by dishonest journalists, politicians and academics. And I hate seeing my God being treated like a homophobe for what He teaches in His Bible.

So if you’re not going to stop calling me a “hater” for wanting homosexuals to be saved and healed, or for opposing their political agenda, let's at least see a little more of that famous “American sense of fair play” in the public debate on this issue.

Hatred of “haters” is hateful too.

Who am I?

I was born in one country, raised in another.
My father was born in another country.
I was not his only child.
He fathered several children with numerous women.
I became very close to my mother, as my father showed no interest in me.
My mother died at an early age from cancer.
Later in life, questions arose over my real name.
My birth records were sketchy and no one was able to produce a legitimate, reliable birth certificate.
I grew up practicing one faith but converted to Christianity, as it was widely accepted in my country, but i practiced non-traditional beliefs & didn't follow Christianity, except in the public eye under scrutiny.
I worked and lived among lower-class people as a young adult, disguising myself as someone who really cared about them.
That was before I decided it was time to get serious about my life and I embarked on a new career.
I wrote a book about my struggles growing up.
It was clear to those who read my memoirs that I had difficulties accepting that my father abandoned me as a child.
I became active in loval politics, then with help behind the scenes, I literally burst onto the scene as a candidate for national office in my 40s.
They said I had a golden tongue and could talk anyone into anything.
That reinforced my conceit.
I had a virtually non-existent resume, little work history, and no experience in leading a single organization.
Yet I was a powerful speaker and citizens were drawn to me as though I were a magnet and they were small roofing tacks.
I drew incredibly large crowds during my public appearances.
This bolstered my ego.
At first, my political campaign focused on my country's foreign policy.
I was very critical of my country in the last war and seized every opportunity to bash my country.
But what launched my rise to national prominence were my views on the country's economy.
I pretended to have a really good plan on how we could do better and every poor person would be fed & housed for free.
I knew which group was responsible for getting us into this mess.
It was the free market, banks & corporations.
I decided to start making citizens hate them and if they were envious of others who did well, the plan was clinched tight.
I called mine "A People's Campaign" and that sounded good to all people.
I was the surprise candidate because I emerged from outside the traditional path of politics and was able to gain widespread popular support.
I knew that if i merely offered the people 'hope', together we could change our country and the world.
So, I started to make my speeches sound like they were on behalf of the downtrodden, poor, ignorant to include "persecuted minorities" like the Jews.
My true views were not widely known and I needed to keep them unknown, until after I became my nation's leader.
I had to carefully guard reality, as anybody could have easily found out what I really believed, if they had simply read my writings and examined those people I associated with.
I'm glad they didn't.
Then I became the most powerful man in the world.
And the world learned the truth.
Who am I?

Is "tolerance" killing America?

In today's world where we speak in terms of "tolerance" and "diversity" and are proud of our stance, very few of us see the tragic implications of what these words really mean at least in the more "progressive" sense, today's adaptation.

America has been known for it's strength, it's integrity and unwillingness to vere away from it's principles until, I believe, these words became the "norm" for today's society. I came across this article and as I was reading it I found the striking resemblances to the way America was in it's early years when people came here to seek religious freedom and somehow assimilated into our culture, spoke our languages fought in our wars and enjoyed their individual liberty, we were United as a country, today, however, it is a different story.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd - Australia Muslims who want to live under Islamic Sharia law were told on Wednesday to get out of Australia , as the government targeted radicals in a bid to head off potential terror attacks.

Separately, Rudd angered some Australian Muslims on Wednesday by saying he supported spy agencies monitoring the nation's mosques.
'IMMIGRANTS, NOT AUSTRALIANS, MUST ADAPT. Take It Or Leave It. I am tired of this nation worrying about whether we are offending some individual or their culture. Since the terrorist attacks on Bali , we have experienced a surge in patriotism by the majority of Australians. '

'This culture has been developed over two centuries of struggles, trials and victories by millions of men and women who have sought freedom' 'We speak mainly ENGLISH, not Spanish, Lebanese, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Russian, or any other language. Therefore, if you wish to become part of our society . Learn the language!'

'Most Australians believe in God. This is not some Christian, right wing, political push, but a fact, because Christian men and women, on Christian principles, founded this nation, and this is clearly documented. It is certainly appropriate to display it on the walls of our schools. If God offends you, then I suggest you consider another part of the world as your new home, because God is part of our culture.'

'We will accept your beliefs, and will not question why. All we ask is that you accept ours, and live in harmony and peaceful enjoyment with us.' 'This is OUR COUNTRY, OUR LAND, and OUR LIFESTYLE, and we will allow you every opportunity to enjoy all this."

But once you are done complaining, whining, and griping about Our Flag, Our Pledge, Our Christian beliefs, or Our Way of Life, I highly encourage you take advantage of one other great Australian freedom, 'THE RIGHT TO LEAVE'.''If you aren't happy here then LEAVE. We didn't force you to come here. You asked to be here. So accept the country YOU accepted.'

For those who dissagree, it is important that you do your homework and truly begin to understand that "tolerance" will ultimately mean a continual violation of your rights. Become educated and make a difference while you still can.

Monday, March 2, 2009

Similarities between Christians and Hollywood?

I was watching television last night and a commercial for UNICEF came on , appearing to be sponsored by our hollywood celebrities pleading about how we should help the children. I love children and am drawn when viewing to do what I can to help these children.These commercials break my heart as we watch the dire consequences, the famine, pestilence and violence of what their parents have left for them.It was a plea that appeared to be targeting the American people to help the children in hard hit areas around the world.

At first glance it would appear that these hollywood celebs really do care about the children, but after a moment I wondered "Who's children do they really care for?" I tried to watch this commercial objectively and realized I couldn't , to me, it appeared they cared more about the children in other countries than our own. Why do I say this?

There are 55oo children a day in America that lose their lives. 50 million since the 1950's. Their lives appear to be lost due to the "CHOICE", selfishness,lack of self control or merely for convenience and has become a mere option or "convenience" for the fast-paced American lifestyle. Why is it that Hollywood celebs do nothing to stand against the murder of the unborn in our own country?

As I began to ponder this commercial I realized this plea, by hollywood, is much like the "Christians" and their plea to spare innocent life except for one thing, the hollywood celebs are not being met with any opposition, why?

If I am a hollywood celeb and feel that I need to promote UNICEF to help save innocent lives, it is my passion and what I feel deep down inside as a driving force to help these children.
If I am a "Christian" and I feel the need to protect these children and is my passion, why am I met with such opposition?

For the sake of argument, what if these countries believed in having these children grow up this way? What if it is a mere option,'CHOICE",convenience, or religious belief for them for whatever reason, who are we to try to change their ideology? Do we believe it is immoral? inhumane? sacreligious?Yet the hollywood celebs push on in their quest to "save the children"

I never thought I would compare Christians to hollywood but I find the continuity in the area of fighting for a cause to be strickingly similar.

As Hollywood contiues to try to "save the children" across the world in what their parents have left for them, for whatever reason, we, the Christians, who believe in the sanctity of life, will continue to try to save them here from what future we, as parents, have left for ours, for those who are left and be thankful for each one saved.