Kevin Miller at the Canyon County jail
Did you listen to the radio the other day when he was at the
jail? Did you really hear what was being said? Did you understand what they
said? As I was listening, I was mortified!
Kevin Miller, lately, has done a great job getting our great
“leaders” on the radio but the interviews should strike fear in the hearts of
the people that elected them but why is there still silence? I believe it is
because the people that elected them have forgotten the purpose of elections or
the indoctrination in our tax funded education system is finally seeing the
fulfillment of its agenda.
Was our election process put in place as a popularity
contest like American Idol? Was it to get someone in there to fulfill and
agenda? The reason was originally to elect trustworthy, morally upright
individuals that had a firm understanding of the principles of freedom, a
knowledge and a desire to preserve these principles to secure freedom for
future generations, not to write laws to protect us from ourselves using “In
the name of security” and fear tactics to force people into submission in reckless
abandon!
I hear the governor, mayors of several cities, congressman,
legislators, law enforcement and sheriffs talking about things that prove the ignorance
of the people because they were elected to office. This is not about whether
these people are nice or good looking or popular or not, many of them I know
personally and are very nice people, this should be about whether they possess
the ability and the knowledge to do what their position requires. Can they distinguish
the difference between the preservation of freedom and “in the name of
security?” If you ask me, if they do, they are ignoring it because nothing could
be further from the truth, All you have to do is ask yourself are you as free
as you were even one year ago? Simple, right?
I have been told by many via email and on the phone that I
speak at a level that is difficult to understand or maybe I do not make my
point as clearly as I should, in either case I see the danger of what is being
said and the simple fact that I see it is enough to try to be informative even
if I lack that ability, or that I am grammatically challenged, because I care
enough. I am constantly trying to shape my message and hopefully people, over time
will realize I am not nuts and have their best interest at heart
In order to try to help make my point, I am going to take a
few statements that were mentioned and ask you what the consequences would be
of what our government supports in these statements.
It was stated that the sheriff and the Boise mayor approve
of the gay ordinance because it protects gays.
Sounds harmless, doesn’t it? Now, think about what that
means and how it correlates with law and freedom. If you create a law to
protect one class of people, wouldn’t that elevate the rights of one class over
another? Now, what does the intent of the law state? Laws in this country in
order to maximize freedom and justice for all mean that any law created must
apply to all people equally! If the law is unequally placed, it creates a
division between the particular classes of people. The fact remains that the
law that applies to all is one that if anyone is harmed that justice will be
served, no matter who you are, a law that applies to all people, not just a
few. If you support laws for gays, shall you have laws for short people, tall
people, Asians, Christians, and Blacks? Do you see how detrimental this is? Not
only are ordinances like this dangerous
but it also proves how dangerous it is to authorize or to allow governments to
make laws like this that are supported by law enforcement because it proves
they lack the proper understanding of the law. In other words, there are
already laws for criminal behavior that apply to all people! Their lack of
understanding, by default is detrimental as you will see,
Another issue is the support for the jail. Do we need
another jail? What are the alternatives? If governments are allowed to create
any law and the people have no way to fight against, the government then has
breached its limitations and has become the ruler not the protector. If
government can write any laws, the consequence is the unlawful incremental
criminalization of the people that fill these jails! If government has breached
their limitations and can write any law they please and forcefully apply these
laws to the people, is not the consequence of this the overcrowding in jails,
causing the tax payers to continually fund their own eventual enslavement under
the guise of keeping them safe?
What is the consequence of the increase of laws? What is the
consequence of attaching fines to these laws (when used to generate revenue)?
What is the consequence of allowing government to write every law “in the name
of security?” What is the consequence of abandoning civics class in public
school, re-writing history and electing government officials with no
understanding of our history or without civics? What is the consequence of
those successfully indoctrinated by the public school that they funded that
strayed from the principles that guaranteed our freedom? What is the
consequence of government breaching its limitations on the people? What is the
consequence of ignorance of history?
Finally, one of the most disturbing comments is when I
questioned the chief of police. “Is the supreme court the supreme law of the
land” to which he stated ON AIR that it was! Here is the supreme authority in
the county, the sheriff, charged with protecting his people against the
encroachment of the federal government submitting to the authority of the
federal government with obviously no understanding of checks and balances and
the delicate jurisdictional boundaries thereof!
These are only a few of the many issues that should be
addressed but yet, there is no outrage almost as if the people, the once
powerful authority with the inherent power of the government has willfully
relinquished that power to their government, not in the name of freedom but in
the name of safety where there are no longer any limitations on what government
can do. As a man of honor, and basic understanding of the law, in support of its
proper limited application as was intended, I stand against all forms of
tyranny, both foreign and domestic. As a
man of honor, the preservation of freedom and liberty supersede personal and
political friendships and affiliations and I will stand for these principles
because the people deserve to know they have been led astray and I will speak
of these principles until I can no longer speak. Amen
I would again like to than KIDO and Kevin Miller for
allowing me the opportunities to speak on the radio, you are good Americans to
whom I am indebted with gratitude.
Tom Munds
No comments:
Post a Comment