As a Christians most of us are told that "The Jews" are the chosen people.
As Americans we are taught that we are a nation founded on Christian principles.
We are taught that Muslims are a religion of peaceful people.
We are taught that the government is out for our best interest and that they serve their constitutents and some people to this day still believe they do.
What if everything you were taught to believe was a lie, how would you know? As I have mentioned in previous posts about the dangers of "moral relativism" here is one more reason why I feel it is so dangerous.
How is it we changed from a nation of absolute truth and become a culture to believe that facts are irrelevent and what is true is only ones opinion?
Although this intro could take us in 1million directions, I wanted to share with you one scenario in which I have been debating via email with a friend in Kansas city, MO where he focuses on the 9-11 conspiracy trying to educate others on how important it is. It would appear that lately rather than focusing only on 9-11 itself, he has shifted his focus more on the possiblity that the Jews are responsible for the terror attacks rather than the Muslims and that the Muslims are the ones being persecuted.
Although I was in complete disbelief and thought he was nuts at first I thought about it for awhile and realized that this countries elite are what few believe to be the the Khazar Jews. Could these elite have full control behind the scenes? Bernanke, Greenspan, Spielberg etc?
I have spent time in the study of the Muslim culture and Islam through the Koran and the Hadith as well as books written by friends that give a history of Islam and after reading these books, it is my opinion that Islam is truly a religion of oppression and violence, their suras speak for themselves.
Knowing this, I have had extreme difficulty believeing that the Muslims could be the ones being persecuted and blamed on these attacks especially when KSM and others admitted the planning and execution.
I am in a bit of a quandry and now am forced to consider further studies and I will.
We all know the media has a bias, we all know that many things that were once considered conspiracy theory has now become true, at least to those who choose to believe it , is this any different?
Only time will reveal the truth and only when people begin to see things with their own eyes will they consider the multitude of possiblities because no one wants to believe in bad things especially when they could happen to you, will it be too late? Will our consequences be because of our disinterest in what could be happening around us?
I submit some information for your consideration:
Through previous posts I have written my thoughts on Islam I give you today some population percentages of the growth and expance of their culture. Over time we may be able to see what happens in the areas with the growth of the population in different areas. In addition I have included some links that give some consideration to the argument that the Jews were responsible and not the Muslims. I am a bit perplexed myself, how about you?
http://jewishcrimenetworkdid911.blogspot.com/
www.911MISSINGLINKS.com
It was recommended that I view JEWISHCRIMENETWORKDID911, go to that page and See the EVIDENCE involving Rabbi Dov Zakheim, Comptroller of the Pentagon in the period before 9/11 when $2.3 trillion dollars in allocations went missing. Please learn about this one mastermind--and consider all the others it took to pull off this masterful "false flags" operation which Israel is known for.
Here are the facts on Islam throoughout the world:
ISLAM’S WORLDWIDE THREAT: Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult. In its fullest form, it is a complete, total, 100% system of life. Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, social, and military components. The religious component is a facade for all other components.
Islamization begins when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their so-called ‘religious rights.’
When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse societies agree to ‘the reasonable’ Muslim demands for their ‘religious rights,’ they also get the other components under the table.
Here’s how it works. (percentages source CIA: The World Fact Book – 2007).
As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens. In fact, they may be featured in articles and films, stereotyped for their colorful uniqueness:
This is the case in:
United States — Muslim 0.6%
Australia — Muslim 1.5%
Canada — Muslim 1.9%
China — Muslim 1.8%
Italy — Muslim 1.5%
Norway — Muslim 1.8%
At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs. This is happening in:
Denmark — Muslim 2%
Germany — Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%
Spain — Muslim 4%
Thailand — Muslim 4.6%
From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. This is occurring in:
France — Muslim 8%
Philippines — Muslim 5%
Sweden — Muslim 5%
Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad & Tobago — Muslim 5.8%
At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.
When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam, with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections, in:
Guyana — Muslim 10%
India — Muslim 13.4%
Israel — Muslim 16%
Kenya — Muslim 10%
Russia — Muslim 15%
After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues, such as in:
Ethiopia — Muslim 32.8%
At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare, such as in:
Bosnia — Muslim 40%
Chad — Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%
From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels, such as in:
Albania — Muslim 70%
Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%
Qatar — Muslim 77.5%
Sudan — Muslim 70%
After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, such as has been experienced and in some ways is on-going in:
Bangladesh — Muslim 83%
Egypt — Muslim 90%
Gaza — Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%
Iran — Muslim 98%
Iraq — Muslim 97%
Jordan — Muslim 92%
Morocco — Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan — Muslim 97%
Palestine — Muslim 99%
Syria — Muslim 90%
Tajikistan — Muslim 90%
Turkey — Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%
100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ — the Islamic House of Peace. Here there’s supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the Madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word, such as in:
Afghanistan — Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%
Somalia — Muslim 100%
Yemen — Muslim 100%
Unfortunately, peace in never achieved, as in these 100% states the most radical Muslims intimidate and spew hatred, and satisfy their blood lust by killing less radical Muslims, for a variety of reasons.
‘Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; the tribe against the world, and all of us against the infidel.
– Leon Uris, ‘The Haj’
It is important to understand that in some countries, with well under 100% Muslim populations, such as France, the minority Muslim populations live in ghettos, within which they are 100% Muslim, and within which they live by Sharia Law. The national police do not even enter these ghettos.
There are no national courts nor schools nor non-Muslim religious facilities. In such situations, Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. The children attend madrasses. They learn only the Koran. To even associate with an infidel is a crime punishable with death. Therefore, in some areas of certain nations, Muslim Imams and extremists exercise more power than the national average would indicate.
Today’s 1.5 billion Muslims make up 22% of the world’s population. But their birth rates dwarf the birth rates of Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, and Jews, and all other believers. Muslims will exceed 50% of the world’s population by the end of this century.
Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond’s book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat
America, you like the Islam culture? If the information is true regarding the percentages, I suspect there is a large problem on the horizon, in the not to distant future,do you see the possibility?We have been taught to deny our own culture in support of all others we know little about, in the name of tolerance,when others are not tolerant of ours, but why should that be a surprise when we disavowed our own culture we knew little to nothing about.
Maybe this is why the Jews aren't in the media are because it is controlled by them, what do we know about the Jews anyway? Most belive they are Christians, maybe thats why Christians have a bad wrap, who knows. More on the Khazar Jews another time...
Friday, November 20, 2009
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
The Christian character of the Early Colonists
Did you know that religion was the most dominating factor in every civilization and history dictates that the purer the religion, the wiser the civil government?
Did the Early American colonists possess Christian character in the establishment of this nation?
History shows that Christianity was the mightiest political and social influence in the world. When compared to Romanism, for example, the colonists believed that the Protestant faith in which this nation was founded, was the only hope of freedom in the world, rather than the Roman doctrines of the Catholic Church.
Although many will say that the Norsemen discovered this continent in 1000A.D. which is true, they had come and gone and it was forgotten until Columbus had discovered it 400 years later.
Columbus at a young age believed that he was called by God, his name meaning “Christ-bearer” he felt he was to be a messenger of God of “The new heavens and new Earth.”
Contrary to most history books today, Columbus was a man of prayer. Before his first voyage and the discovery of San Salvador, a Holy Communion was celebrated in Palos, Spain. After his discovery a cross was erected as they sung “Gloria in Excelsis”, which means Glory in the highest.
Columbus’ second voyage was accompanied by 12 priests and endorsed with the authority of King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella to give spiritual attention to the natives. Many voyages occurred and all of them included the papal authority to take these countries in the name of the church.
There were many reasons to discover the new world including wealth, greed and enterprise but studies indicate that the chief ambition was to honor God.
Back in Europe this was a great time of tyranny and oppression and the people were becoming increasingly agitated, in addition to, John Huss and the spread of Wyclifs English Bible that were all noted to be the main attributes of the reformation.
John Huss with his leadership was considered the ‘prophet of the nations” and his presence threatened the crown. He considered the Reformation to be “much more than an emancipation of the mind but a political national and international revolution.”
The divine right of Kings was being replaced by Constitutional government. Reformers proclaimed that “there shall be no distinction between spiritual and secular laws among Christians in that they were not to have two consciences, one for the state and one for the church.
The king of Spain said “the conversion of the Indians is the principle foundation if this conquest.”
With the Spanish in the South and the Pacific, The French along St. Lawrence, Mississippi and in Montreal, it wasn’t until the defeat of Montcalm and the fall of Quebec that opened the door to the American republic where personal and civil liberty and individual freedom began to take root.
The Virginia colony was the first English colony established by Protestants in North America and promoted by religion.
The first charter of the Virginia colony was “to provide that the true word and service of God be preached, planted and used not only for the colony but among the savages.”
“The colony under providence of Almighty God might tend to the glory of his Divine majesty in propagating the Christian religion.’
The first building erected was built for worship and the first law was “to aid the colonists in keeping of good conscience.”
In 1619 the church was established by law, yearly salaries were established for clergy that were paid for by all males 16 years and older. In 1624 every plantation had to provide a house or room for public worship.
Plymouth colony was established 13 years after Jamestown and was created to “practice a positive part of church reformation and propagate the gospel in America.”
The Mayflower reaches and anchors off Cape Cod and the colonists create the Mayflower compact organizing a “civil body politic”
It reads, in summation:
“In the name of God Amen. By the grace of God our countries have undertaken for the glory of God and the advancement of the Christian faith. To enact, constitute and frame such just and equal laws, ordinances, acts, constitutions and offices unto which we promise all due submission and obedience.”
(Nov. 11,1620)
Massachusetts bay, John Winthorp, governor “I submit and dedicate myself to God’s will and yours.”
Hartford, Connecticut, settled in 1623, according to Dr. Baird “carried the ark of the Lord with them and made religion the basis of their institutions including civil government that all would be ordered by the rules scriptures held forth.”
Maryland, Lord Baltimore, Roman Catholic, “ No persecution within the province professing the belief in Jesus Christ shall be troubled, molested or discounted for their religion or “ free exercise thereof”
Frederick Maurice stated “Colonies are sect commonwealths connected by religious convictions and persecutions; to their religion they owed their best qualities.”
John Milton, teacher and poet “The Bible doth more clearly teach the solid rules of civil government.”
William Penn “God in Christ has placed a principle in every man and infirm him of his duty and enable him to do it”
Religion led them to abandon their country rather than submit to tyranny and coming to this continent they were hoping for two things:
the enlargement of Christ’s’ kingdom by conversion of the heathen tribes and the founding of an empire for their children in which their religion could prevail.”
The continual study of the American commonwealth is a continual affirmation of Gods divine hand in the creation of this continent. These colonists believed that the Bible was everything from religious principles, the basis for law and government and all matters of common life.
This being further proof that we are a nation founded on religious Christian principles, and confirms the Christian character of the early colonists.
Did the Early American colonists possess Christian character in the establishment of this nation?
History shows that Christianity was the mightiest political and social influence in the world. When compared to Romanism, for example, the colonists believed that the Protestant faith in which this nation was founded, was the only hope of freedom in the world, rather than the Roman doctrines of the Catholic Church.
Although many will say that the Norsemen discovered this continent in 1000A.D. which is true, they had come and gone and it was forgotten until Columbus had discovered it 400 years later.
Columbus at a young age believed that he was called by God, his name meaning “Christ-bearer” he felt he was to be a messenger of God of “The new heavens and new Earth.”
Contrary to most history books today, Columbus was a man of prayer. Before his first voyage and the discovery of San Salvador, a Holy Communion was celebrated in Palos, Spain. After his discovery a cross was erected as they sung “Gloria in Excelsis”, which means Glory in the highest.
Columbus’ second voyage was accompanied by 12 priests and endorsed with the authority of King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella to give spiritual attention to the natives. Many voyages occurred and all of them included the papal authority to take these countries in the name of the church.
There were many reasons to discover the new world including wealth, greed and enterprise but studies indicate that the chief ambition was to honor God.
Back in Europe this was a great time of tyranny and oppression and the people were becoming increasingly agitated, in addition to, John Huss and the spread of Wyclifs English Bible that were all noted to be the main attributes of the reformation.
John Huss with his leadership was considered the ‘prophet of the nations” and his presence threatened the crown. He considered the Reformation to be “much more than an emancipation of the mind but a political national and international revolution.”
The divine right of Kings was being replaced by Constitutional government. Reformers proclaimed that “there shall be no distinction between spiritual and secular laws among Christians in that they were not to have two consciences, one for the state and one for the church.
The king of Spain said “the conversion of the Indians is the principle foundation if this conquest.”
With the Spanish in the South and the Pacific, The French along St. Lawrence, Mississippi and in Montreal, it wasn’t until the defeat of Montcalm and the fall of Quebec that opened the door to the American republic where personal and civil liberty and individual freedom began to take root.
The Virginia colony was the first English colony established by Protestants in North America and promoted by religion.
The first charter of the Virginia colony was “to provide that the true word and service of God be preached, planted and used not only for the colony but among the savages.”
“The colony under providence of Almighty God might tend to the glory of his Divine majesty in propagating the Christian religion.’
The first building erected was built for worship and the first law was “to aid the colonists in keeping of good conscience.”
In 1619 the church was established by law, yearly salaries were established for clergy that were paid for by all males 16 years and older. In 1624 every plantation had to provide a house or room for public worship.
Plymouth colony was established 13 years after Jamestown and was created to “practice a positive part of church reformation and propagate the gospel in America.”
The Mayflower reaches and anchors off Cape Cod and the colonists create the Mayflower compact organizing a “civil body politic”
It reads, in summation:
“In the name of God Amen. By the grace of God our countries have undertaken for the glory of God and the advancement of the Christian faith. To enact, constitute and frame such just and equal laws, ordinances, acts, constitutions and offices unto which we promise all due submission and obedience.”
(Nov. 11,1620)
Massachusetts bay, John Winthorp, governor “I submit and dedicate myself to God’s will and yours.”
Hartford, Connecticut, settled in 1623, according to Dr. Baird “carried the ark of the Lord with them and made religion the basis of their institutions including civil government that all would be ordered by the rules scriptures held forth.”
Maryland, Lord Baltimore, Roman Catholic, “ No persecution within the province professing the belief in Jesus Christ shall be troubled, molested or discounted for their religion or “ free exercise thereof”
Frederick Maurice stated “Colonies are sect commonwealths connected by religious convictions and persecutions; to their religion they owed their best qualities.”
John Milton, teacher and poet “The Bible doth more clearly teach the solid rules of civil government.”
William Penn “God in Christ has placed a principle in every man and infirm him of his duty and enable him to do it”
Religion led them to abandon their country rather than submit to tyranny and coming to this continent they were hoping for two things:
the enlargement of Christ’s’ kingdom by conversion of the heathen tribes and the founding of an empire for their children in which their religion could prevail.”
The continual study of the American commonwealth is a continual affirmation of Gods divine hand in the creation of this continent. These colonists believed that the Bible was everything from religious principles, the basis for law and government and all matters of common life.
This being further proof that we are a nation founded on religious Christian principles, and confirms the Christian character of the early colonists.
Did the Supreme court get it wrong?
Was the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the “Separation of church and state” as the founders intended? Was there, in fact, a separation and is it important?
The first of the Bill of Rights states:
“Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of a religion or prohibit the free exercise thereof or abridging the freedom of speech…”
Before the pilgrims came to America, the King of England imposed oppressive tyranny on Great Britain with a State controlled church that became increasingly unfavorable with it’s citizens.
Puritan “separatists” fled the Kings rule and boarded the Mayflower in search of the New World, specifically, to further Christianity and their freedom to worship their religion without persecution.
Finally reaching land, they began to build, more came and 13 colonies were established in that each colony had their own religion.
After continual growth, the nation was formed uniting these colonies where the Declaration and Bill of rights was established to guarantee the rights of men that were believed to have been given to them by God. The unification of these states into a nation was not without difficulties, one of which is a great source of contention today, after all what the pilgrims had left was still fresh in their memory.
Evidence of this memory was a letter written on November 7, 1801 to Jefferson by Nehemiah Dodge and the Danbury Baptist church concerned that with the establishment of a nation a national church would also be established.
Thomas Jefferson replies to this letter on January 1, 1802 stating that he had no intention on the creation of a national church and that he would provide “A wall of separation” in that the government would not interfere with the affairs of the church. This letter was the first and only personal letter written by a president used to create such a ruling.
Our historical documentation including quotes provides ample support of this claim.
Congressional records from June through September 1789 make it clear they wanted to follow God’s principles but not allow one denomination to run the nation.
In 1799, the Supreme Court declared:
“By our form of government, the Christian religion is the established religion; and all sects and denominations are placed on the same and equal footing.”
George Washington said:
“If anyone attempted to separate religion and morality from politics they couldn’t be called a Patriot.”
John Dickerson, signer of the Constitution (1732-1808):
“To my creator, I resign myself humbly, confiding in the goodness and His mercy through Jesus Christ for the events of eternity.”
Samuel Adams, signer of the Declaration (1722-1803)
“First of all, I rely upon the merits of Jesus Christ for the pardon of all my sins.”
Gabriel Duvall, U.S. Supreme court justice
“I resign my soul into the hands of the Almighty who gave it in humble hopes of His mercy through our Savior Jesus Christ.”
Many quotes were dated both before and after Jefferson’s letter by men like Patrick Henry, US Supreme court chief justice John Jay, Robert Payne, Ben Franklin, John Quincy Adams, Gunning Bedford, Benjamin Rush and many others that beg the question about this separation.
These quotes and others also speak the importance of religion in a child’s education. The New England Primer was the primary educational source that confirms this.
If the Supreme courts’ job is to properly interpret the Constitution, should they not have had an understanding of the history surrounding these documents knowing that these interpretations could alter the course of history?
One misinterpretation of “freedom of religion” was that people had the freedom to worship any religion including religions other than Christianity, this was simply not true.
The 13 colonies were united in their belief in God, as Christians and differed only in the doctrinal issues. The “freedom of religion” was to allow these individual colonies once they became a nation to continue their freedom to worship without concern of a state church like they left in Europe.
Our founders understood the fragile nature of these guaranteed freedoms and knew the dangerous effects of Multiculturalism.
Ben Franklin said:
“No nation has ever withstood the dangers of Multiculturalism.”
Benjamin Rush stated:
“ If the practice of virtue gives way to moral and cultural relativism, as Multiculturalism espouses, America will lose their republic, freedom and blessings their once promised land bestowed.”
How is it that our founders continually gave thanks and acknowledgement to God and today we not only deny they did but believe instead that the church must be separated from the state and all evidence of God needs to be removed from society, was it so that we would not offend others?
Aristotle quoted:
“Tolerance was the last virtue of a dying society.”
As this nation grew it is important to understand that those who came here assimilated into American culture rather than filing lawsuits and try to change our laws and traditions because they were offended. Let’s see how well it has worked so far.
Since 1962, prayer, the Bible, the Ten Commandments, crosses and other symbols and traditions have been terminated and removed and deemed unlawful. The moral decline since that time is directly proportional to the continual denial of God in society.
Divorce, pornography, corruption, lawsuits, decline of family, homelessness, violent and non-violent crimes in both adults and children, an increase in laws, jail facilities, lack of common sense and personal accountability just to name a few.
The proof of our religious influence is inconsistent with the courts interpretation and needs to be challenged.Examples include but are not limited to:
10 Commandments in Archives building in D.C.
Moses, 10 Commandments and 12 apostles on front entrance of Supreme court
Republican form of government
National motto and currency
Daily congressional opening prayer
Holidays, including Sundays
Swearing under oath
Pledge of allegiance
Founding documents and quotes
Acknowledgement of Supreme court in 1799
Biblical inscription on government Buildings
Inscriptions on walls in Universities
Foundation of Universities
DC visitors bureau
These examples are only some of the many pieces of evidence that allows me to believe that the Supreme court either has little knowledge of our history or they are sworn to uphold and support an entirely different agenda.
It is our own apathy and ignorance of history that has brought us to where we, those who have sworn to protect and uphold the Constitution have come to think we know and protect something that we really know nothing about.
Ben Franklin said:
“A country that knows not where it has been knows not where it is going.”
If the foundations be destroyed what can the righteous do?
The first of the Bill of Rights states:
“Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of a religion or prohibit the free exercise thereof or abridging the freedom of speech…”
Before the pilgrims came to America, the King of England imposed oppressive tyranny on Great Britain with a State controlled church that became increasingly unfavorable with it’s citizens.
Puritan “separatists” fled the Kings rule and boarded the Mayflower in search of the New World, specifically, to further Christianity and their freedom to worship their religion without persecution.
Finally reaching land, they began to build, more came and 13 colonies were established in that each colony had their own religion.
After continual growth, the nation was formed uniting these colonies where the Declaration and Bill of rights was established to guarantee the rights of men that were believed to have been given to them by God. The unification of these states into a nation was not without difficulties, one of which is a great source of contention today, after all what the pilgrims had left was still fresh in their memory.
Evidence of this memory was a letter written on November 7, 1801 to Jefferson by Nehemiah Dodge and the Danbury Baptist church concerned that with the establishment of a nation a national church would also be established.
Thomas Jefferson replies to this letter on January 1, 1802 stating that he had no intention on the creation of a national church and that he would provide “A wall of separation” in that the government would not interfere with the affairs of the church. This letter was the first and only personal letter written by a president used to create such a ruling.
Our historical documentation including quotes provides ample support of this claim.
Congressional records from June through September 1789 make it clear they wanted to follow God’s principles but not allow one denomination to run the nation.
In 1799, the Supreme Court declared:
“By our form of government, the Christian religion is the established religion; and all sects and denominations are placed on the same and equal footing.”
George Washington said:
“If anyone attempted to separate religion and morality from politics they couldn’t be called a Patriot.”
John Dickerson, signer of the Constitution (1732-1808):
“To my creator, I resign myself humbly, confiding in the goodness and His mercy through Jesus Christ for the events of eternity.”
Samuel Adams, signer of the Declaration (1722-1803)
“First of all, I rely upon the merits of Jesus Christ for the pardon of all my sins.”
Gabriel Duvall, U.S. Supreme court justice
“I resign my soul into the hands of the Almighty who gave it in humble hopes of His mercy through our Savior Jesus Christ.”
Many quotes were dated both before and after Jefferson’s letter by men like Patrick Henry, US Supreme court chief justice John Jay, Robert Payne, Ben Franklin, John Quincy Adams, Gunning Bedford, Benjamin Rush and many others that beg the question about this separation.
These quotes and others also speak the importance of religion in a child’s education. The New England Primer was the primary educational source that confirms this.
If the Supreme courts’ job is to properly interpret the Constitution, should they not have had an understanding of the history surrounding these documents knowing that these interpretations could alter the course of history?
One misinterpretation of “freedom of religion” was that people had the freedom to worship any religion including religions other than Christianity, this was simply not true.
The 13 colonies were united in their belief in God, as Christians and differed only in the doctrinal issues. The “freedom of religion” was to allow these individual colonies once they became a nation to continue their freedom to worship without concern of a state church like they left in Europe.
Our founders understood the fragile nature of these guaranteed freedoms and knew the dangerous effects of Multiculturalism.
Ben Franklin said:
“No nation has ever withstood the dangers of Multiculturalism.”
Benjamin Rush stated:
“ If the practice of virtue gives way to moral and cultural relativism, as Multiculturalism espouses, America will lose their republic, freedom and blessings their once promised land bestowed.”
How is it that our founders continually gave thanks and acknowledgement to God and today we not only deny they did but believe instead that the church must be separated from the state and all evidence of God needs to be removed from society, was it so that we would not offend others?
Aristotle quoted:
“Tolerance was the last virtue of a dying society.”
As this nation grew it is important to understand that those who came here assimilated into American culture rather than filing lawsuits and try to change our laws and traditions because they were offended. Let’s see how well it has worked so far.
Since 1962, prayer, the Bible, the Ten Commandments, crosses and other symbols and traditions have been terminated and removed and deemed unlawful. The moral decline since that time is directly proportional to the continual denial of God in society.
Divorce, pornography, corruption, lawsuits, decline of family, homelessness, violent and non-violent crimes in both adults and children, an increase in laws, jail facilities, lack of common sense and personal accountability just to name a few.
The proof of our religious influence is inconsistent with the courts interpretation and needs to be challenged.Examples include but are not limited to:
10 Commandments in Archives building in D.C.
Moses, 10 Commandments and 12 apostles on front entrance of Supreme court
Republican form of government
National motto and currency
Daily congressional opening prayer
Holidays, including Sundays
Swearing under oath
Pledge of allegiance
Founding documents and quotes
Acknowledgement of Supreme court in 1799
Biblical inscription on government Buildings
Inscriptions on walls in Universities
Foundation of Universities
DC visitors bureau
These examples are only some of the many pieces of evidence that allows me to believe that the Supreme court either has little knowledge of our history or they are sworn to uphold and support an entirely different agenda.
It is our own apathy and ignorance of history that has brought us to where we, those who have sworn to protect and uphold the Constitution have come to think we know and protect something that we really know nothing about.
Ben Franklin said:
“A country that knows not where it has been knows not where it is going.”
If the foundations be destroyed what can the righteous do?
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
AMERICA: UNDER THE INFLUENCE
Have “We the people” in America lost our minds? Have we become a nation under the influence of something so powerful that it has made us lose all rationale, all common sense? Do we still have respect for the sacrifices that have been made for our freedoms and for our Constitution? Did you know that we are farther from a free country than we have ever been?
Before I begin giving examples of irrational behavior maybe it is a good time to list some of the 10 planks of the Communist manifesto. Is it possible that this country got where it is by accident or is this all part of a plan to destroy the last free country in the world? Maybe after reading them we will be able to see our direction a bit more clearly.
These planks were written as the steps to destroy free enterprise and initiate the ultimate in a socialist state.
Abolition of private property, heavy graduated income tax, abolish rights to inheritance, centralize the banks, equal liability for labor, take over auto industry, unions, education, media and to ultimately gain full control over the citizens of which are governed in addition to doing away with loyalty oaths and symbols of our nations sovereignty and anything that lifts us above other nations, after all we are all to be equal.
Have we become sheep just following others, doing what we are told trusting the government like lambs to the slaughter?
Ever wonder why people voluntarily accept vaccinations without ever questioning how they are made, if they are safe and if they have been tested? Is it because we trust that the government is looking out for our best interest? Why are they pushing so hard and so adamant about forcing it on the people even before it was even tested. Is this Constitutional?
More examples of other odd behaviors are:
Our schools are beginning to teach our children sex education beginning in kindergarten, does it teach them to be promiscuous at an earlier age? Our schools teach children to accept homosexuality as an acceptable alternative lifestyle. Do we focus on the importance of the heterosexual lifestyle in public school or should this be left to be taught at home? Is this indoctrination or education?
In the last few weeks there were several instances where students were effected by the zero tolerance weapons ban at school.
One school district considered suspending a six year old student and considered sending him to reform school for having a eating utensil used for camping at his elementary school claiming that there was a zero tolerance for weapons.
The other incident was a high school student that was suspended for having a pocket knife in the glove compartment of his car. They considered not only suspending him but wanted to consider suspending his future plans to attend WestPoint the following year.
Why have public schools forced and adhered to zero tolerance rules while also forcing our children to be tolerant of other issues at the same time, is this consistent? Why does the government feel they have the elevated control over the parent to teach the children what they feel is right without consideration of the parents? What gives the schools or the president of the United States the authority to impose their agenda upon our children when they know that there are a great many that disagree with this administrations policies.
Our public schools across the country that are forced to separate the church from the state but find it acceptable to sing praises to Obama that “He will save us?” using church hymns?
Isn’t it strange that our current president with all of the problems our nation faces still has time to expand his reach, campaign for other candidates, make appearances on late night television, make daily appearances on mainstream news media, with the exception of Fox, become a lobbyist for his own programs, push them, sell them, repackage them and still have time to save the world? Does anyone realize the fact that we expect the president to fix our economy is a violation of the Constitution and by expecting him to do so has willingly given him unconstitutional control?
Why do you suppose we believe that the government can take better care of us that we can as individuals?
Did you know that our congress plans to pass and shove their legislation down our throats using scare tactics not even bothering to read the bill they are supporting even if we don’t like it, is there reasoning because we just don’t understand it or knowing there are some of us who will vote for it without even knowing what it says.
Do we understand that the government itself has no money and that “Tax dollars” is money that the government receives from the money we pay to the government in the form of taxes? Do we understand that allowing the government to expand in size, power and control will erode the freedoms of the citizens returning us to the bondage and tyranny we fled from just before America was established? Still no one questions the unconstitutional nature of such government overreach?
Why does congress believe we should apologize to other countries for our behavior, to make friends with our enemies? Do they believe that they would not have been our enemies if they had been better understood? Should we really grant known terrorists rights, amnesty and healthcare at the expense of those they tried to kill? Are we to understand that violent religions are peaceful even if the evidence is to the contrary?
It is hard to understand the Constitutionality of the 30 presidential appointed czars that somehow are immune to any congressional approval ultimately left only to answer to the president? As a man who has sworn to defend and uphold the Constitution of the United States why do all of his appointees have ties to communism and whom give great reverence to dictators like Mao Tsedong, Saul Aulinski, Karl Marx and others?
Why is it so important that this administration passes this healthcare overhaul, why does it have to have a public option and why does it have to be government run?
Has anyone noticed that the legislation passed by this administration has been pro-government and all been passed by force using scare tactics? Our government has taken over the media, the banking industry, the auto industry, real estate, healthcare, food industry and the economy as a whole. They have printed money, created tremendous debt through bailouts, stimulus packages and other programs including the clunkers program without listening to their constituents?
Do we really believe that the stimulus, bailouts, clunkers have helped? We are told that the lack of immigration reform and open borders, cap and trade disarming the military and compromising national security will make us stronger?
We are told that our economy is improving regardless of the 500k jobs lost every month and watching the stock market go up- He told us not to watch the DJIA when it was down because it was not an accurate account of what is happening but now that it is up it is ok?
How can the DJIA be going up with continual decline in the economy, is it being manipulated before a major collapse?
We are told that our economy is improving because of the GDP numbers increase of 3.5 % but have we forgotten why this happened? Was it not from the temporary government program meant to generate the economy and since the programs termination will bring the same dismal numbers as before the programs inception? Somehow they left out the fact that the clunkers program left each taxpayer with a bill of about 5000.00 for the program-Who will pay this debt?
It has been said that if we continue to go in this direction that our economy will continue to recover, can someone tell me how this is possible and how we can avoid what I believe to be a future of chaos, civil unrest due to the socio-economic collapse that appears inevitable and what will fail in comparison to the last revolution?
Isn’t it interesting that within our first amendment of the bill of rights that the government has managed to separate the church from the state and regulate the redress of grievances but somehow has failed to restrain the freedom of the press? How many ways are their to interpret the right to bear arms shall not be infringed?
Is the government telling us that they know what is better for us than we do, resembling the entitlement , nanny state?
I am intrigued by the ability of this administration to change the definitions of words and their intentions to deceive people into going along with their agenda if it is not accepted the first time?
When people rose up about the taxation they told us that paying taxes was our patriotic duty, when they began the acquisition of the banks, the auto industry, healthcare they said that spreading the wealth wasn’t socialism. They say people in opposition to their agenda were right wing extremists and should be labeled as domestic terrorists but the middle eastern terrorists should be given benefits at the expense of those who have been labeled as such?
Can they continue to pass agendas just by changing the name to something more appealing?
Can we spend our way into prosperity as our government leads us by example? How would that work for my family?
Can we really pass a 1.3 trillion dollar healthcare overhaul without incurring a tax burden on the citizens as promised, how does that work when the nation debt is a direct reflection of the burden tax payers will have to pay?
We are told that global warming is a fact and that we are in danger of passing a point of no return, why was it the name changed from global warming to climate change now stating that cooling is also a result of the global warming. Do we really believe this?
Over 50 years have passed where we have somehow become comfortable believing that abortion is a choice, calling it women’s health, while avoiding the fact that it is a termination of an innocent life? Why is it that we punish those who commit murder but not those who terminate lives for a living, is there a difference simply because the government says there is? We call the murder of 5-15 people a massacre but somehow forget about the 50 million babies whom have had their lives terminated for the sake of convenience, as a choice?
Why are murderers not given their right to choose whether someone lives or dies and why are they punished, are we not being tolerant of others?
How is it we can call it education when we indoctrinate our children with propaganda about evolution without creation, to promote global warming and its dire consequences without facts, that we can sing praises to our president as though he is the messiah, that homosexuality is an acceptable lifestyle giving them special rights, that this countries history deserves to be re-written because it offends others, That our flag is now some kind of disgrace?
Have we bothered to teach that neither evolution or creation is a fact, that the world may or may not be billions of years old because carbon dating has been proven false in 1973, that Atheism and Humanism were both acknowledged as religions by the supreme court, that homosexuality violates every law known to man including civil, natural and biblical law?
Why do we deny our Christian heritage regardless of the evidence to the contrary, do we believe that our government has not committed numerous Constitutional violations and that paying taxes is patriotic, while those opposing the government is an act of terrorism?
My children this past year have been made to believe that our founding fathers were homosexuals, that regardless of your religion evolution is a fact, that Obama will save us, that this country was not founded on Christian principles and that it is illegal to link Christianity with the history of this country.
Why do we believe we can do socialism better than any other country in history aside from the fact that it has failed to accomplish what the governments said it would accomplish and only ended up in hardships for the citizens it was supposed to help and only advantageous to the government who imposed it.
Have we become so stupid as a country that we believe that when something bad happens that we need to create laws to prevent it from happening again and when it does we question why?
The evidence concludes that as time goes on we have become more imperfect, more uncivil and more disrespectful contrary to the views of non-believers that believe we are reaching perfection.
We have become a people who are accustomed to going after brush fires without going to the source of what starts them. We have become so focused on all of the little things but have somehow failed to understand and attack these issues at the source where these little fires begin.
Do you know that we have a state law that states that automobiles must stop at crosswalks to prevent hitting our children and other citizens?
Do you realize we just bombed the moon in search for water? Has anyone thought of the significance of the moon and its importance to life on Earth?
Are we nuts?
We have government funded organizations like:
Battered womens council
Childhelp usa
MADD
National center for missing and exploited children
National center for victims of crimes
Crime prevention council
Domestic violence hotline
Fraud hotline
Parents of murdered children
Sexual violence resource center
Rape, abuse and incest network and others
If we are truly a nation who cares for eachother and others around the world how would you explain that to another country if these were on our resume?
60 years ago God began being removed from society, from politics and public school, we have become a nation of increased government, corruption and the intense desire to create laws. Are these laws and increase in government to replace our own individual common sense or do we no longer have any.
We are truly a nation who is under the influence. Is our nation truly better of without God, the evidence is there for you to decide.
The bible says, A country or government that does not serve me shall perish.
Isaiah 60:12
Before I begin giving examples of irrational behavior maybe it is a good time to list some of the 10 planks of the Communist manifesto. Is it possible that this country got where it is by accident or is this all part of a plan to destroy the last free country in the world? Maybe after reading them we will be able to see our direction a bit more clearly.
These planks were written as the steps to destroy free enterprise and initiate the ultimate in a socialist state.
Abolition of private property, heavy graduated income tax, abolish rights to inheritance, centralize the banks, equal liability for labor, take over auto industry, unions, education, media and to ultimately gain full control over the citizens of which are governed in addition to doing away with loyalty oaths and symbols of our nations sovereignty and anything that lifts us above other nations, after all we are all to be equal.
Have we become sheep just following others, doing what we are told trusting the government like lambs to the slaughter?
Ever wonder why people voluntarily accept vaccinations without ever questioning how they are made, if they are safe and if they have been tested? Is it because we trust that the government is looking out for our best interest? Why are they pushing so hard and so adamant about forcing it on the people even before it was even tested. Is this Constitutional?
More examples of other odd behaviors are:
Our schools are beginning to teach our children sex education beginning in kindergarten, does it teach them to be promiscuous at an earlier age? Our schools teach children to accept homosexuality as an acceptable alternative lifestyle. Do we focus on the importance of the heterosexual lifestyle in public school or should this be left to be taught at home? Is this indoctrination or education?
In the last few weeks there were several instances where students were effected by the zero tolerance weapons ban at school.
One school district considered suspending a six year old student and considered sending him to reform school for having a eating utensil used for camping at his elementary school claiming that there was a zero tolerance for weapons.
The other incident was a high school student that was suspended for having a pocket knife in the glove compartment of his car. They considered not only suspending him but wanted to consider suspending his future plans to attend WestPoint the following year.
Why have public schools forced and adhered to zero tolerance rules while also forcing our children to be tolerant of other issues at the same time, is this consistent? Why does the government feel they have the elevated control over the parent to teach the children what they feel is right without consideration of the parents? What gives the schools or the president of the United States the authority to impose their agenda upon our children when they know that there are a great many that disagree with this administrations policies.
Our public schools across the country that are forced to separate the church from the state but find it acceptable to sing praises to Obama that “He will save us?” using church hymns?
Isn’t it strange that our current president with all of the problems our nation faces still has time to expand his reach, campaign for other candidates, make appearances on late night television, make daily appearances on mainstream news media, with the exception of Fox, become a lobbyist for his own programs, push them, sell them, repackage them and still have time to save the world? Does anyone realize the fact that we expect the president to fix our economy is a violation of the Constitution and by expecting him to do so has willingly given him unconstitutional control?
Why do you suppose we believe that the government can take better care of us that we can as individuals?
Did you know that our congress plans to pass and shove their legislation down our throats using scare tactics not even bothering to read the bill they are supporting even if we don’t like it, is there reasoning because we just don’t understand it or knowing there are some of us who will vote for it without even knowing what it says.
Do we understand that the government itself has no money and that “Tax dollars” is money that the government receives from the money we pay to the government in the form of taxes? Do we understand that allowing the government to expand in size, power and control will erode the freedoms of the citizens returning us to the bondage and tyranny we fled from just before America was established? Still no one questions the unconstitutional nature of such government overreach?
Why does congress believe we should apologize to other countries for our behavior, to make friends with our enemies? Do they believe that they would not have been our enemies if they had been better understood? Should we really grant known terrorists rights, amnesty and healthcare at the expense of those they tried to kill? Are we to understand that violent religions are peaceful even if the evidence is to the contrary?
It is hard to understand the Constitutionality of the 30 presidential appointed czars that somehow are immune to any congressional approval ultimately left only to answer to the president? As a man who has sworn to defend and uphold the Constitution of the United States why do all of his appointees have ties to communism and whom give great reverence to dictators like Mao Tsedong, Saul Aulinski, Karl Marx and others?
Why is it so important that this administration passes this healthcare overhaul, why does it have to have a public option and why does it have to be government run?
Has anyone noticed that the legislation passed by this administration has been pro-government and all been passed by force using scare tactics? Our government has taken over the media, the banking industry, the auto industry, real estate, healthcare, food industry and the economy as a whole. They have printed money, created tremendous debt through bailouts, stimulus packages and other programs including the clunkers program without listening to their constituents?
Do we really believe that the stimulus, bailouts, clunkers have helped? We are told that the lack of immigration reform and open borders, cap and trade disarming the military and compromising national security will make us stronger?
We are told that our economy is improving regardless of the 500k jobs lost every month and watching the stock market go up- He told us not to watch the DJIA when it was down because it was not an accurate account of what is happening but now that it is up it is ok?
How can the DJIA be going up with continual decline in the economy, is it being manipulated before a major collapse?
We are told that our economy is improving because of the GDP numbers increase of 3.5 % but have we forgotten why this happened? Was it not from the temporary government program meant to generate the economy and since the programs termination will bring the same dismal numbers as before the programs inception? Somehow they left out the fact that the clunkers program left each taxpayer with a bill of about 5000.00 for the program-Who will pay this debt?
It has been said that if we continue to go in this direction that our economy will continue to recover, can someone tell me how this is possible and how we can avoid what I believe to be a future of chaos, civil unrest due to the socio-economic collapse that appears inevitable and what will fail in comparison to the last revolution?
Isn’t it interesting that within our first amendment of the bill of rights that the government has managed to separate the church from the state and regulate the redress of grievances but somehow has failed to restrain the freedom of the press? How many ways are their to interpret the right to bear arms shall not be infringed?
Is the government telling us that they know what is better for us than we do, resembling the entitlement , nanny state?
I am intrigued by the ability of this administration to change the definitions of words and their intentions to deceive people into going along with their agenda if it is not accepted the first time?
When people rose up about the taxation they told us that paying taxes was our patriotic duty, when they began the acquisition of the banks, the auto industry, healthcare they said that spreading the wealth wasn’t socialism. They say people in opposition to their agenda were right wing extremists and should be labeled as domestic terrorists but the middle eastern terrorists should be given benefits at the expense of those who have been labeled as such?
Can they continue to pass agendas just by changing the name to something more appealing?
Can we spend our way into prosperity as our government leads us by example? How would that work for my family?
Can we really pass a 1.3 trillion dollar healthcare overhaul without incurring a tax burden on the citizens as promised, how does that work when the nation debt is a direct reflection of the burden tax payers will have to pay?
We are told that global warming is a fact and that we are in danger of passing a point of no return, why was it the name changed from global warming to climate change now stating that cooling is also a result of the global warming. Do we really believe this?
Over 50 years have passed where we have somehow become comfortable believing that abortion is a choice, calling it women’s health, while avoiding the fact that it is a termination of an innocent life? Why is it that we punish those who commit murder but not those who terminate lives for a living, is there a difference simply because the government says there is? We call the murder of 5-15 people a massacre but somehow forget about the 50 million babies whom have had their lives terminated for the sake of convenience, as a choice?
Why are murderers not given their right to choose whether someone lives or dies and why are they punished, are we not being tolerant of others?
How is it we can call it education when we indoctrinate our children with propaganda about evolution without creation, to promote global warming and its dire consequences without facts, that we can sing praises to our president as though he is the messiah, that homosexuality is an acceptable lifestyle giving them special rights, that this countries history deserves to be re-written because it offends others, That our flag is now some kind of disgrace?
Have we bothered to teach that neither evolution or creation is a fact, that the world may or may not be billions of years old because carbon dating has been proven false in 1973, that Atheism and Humanism were both acknowledged as religions by the supreme court, that homosexuality violates every law known to man including civil, natural and biblical law?
Why do we deny our Christian heritage regardless of the evidence to the contrary, do we believe that our government has not committed numerous Constitutional violations and that paying taxes is patriotic, while those opposing the government is an act of terrorism?
My children this past year have been made to believe that our founding fathers were homosexuals, that regardless of your religion evolution is a fact, that Obama will save us, that this country was not founded on Christian principles and that it is illegal to link Christianity with the history of this country.
Why do we believe we can do socialism better than any other country in history aside from the fact that it has failed to accomplish what the governments said it would accomplish and only ended up in hardships for the citizens it was supposed to help and only advantageous to the government who imposed it.
Have we become so stupid as a country that we believe that when something bad happens that we need to create laws to prevent it from happening again and when it does we question why?
The evidence concludes that as time goes on we have become more imperfect, more uncivil and more disrespectful contrary to the views of non-believers that believe we are reaching perfection.
We have become a people who are accustomed to going after brush fires without going to the source of what starts them. We have become so focused on all of the little things but have somehow failed to understand and attack these issues at the source where these little fires begin.
Do you know that we have a state law that states that automobiles must stop at crosswalks to prevent hitting our children and other citizens?
Do you realize we just bombed the moon in search for water? Has anyone thought of the significance of the moon and its importance to life on Earth?
Are we nuts?
We have government funded organizations like:
Battered womens council
Childhelp usa
MADD
National center for missing and exploited children
National center for victims of crimes
Crime prevention council
Domestic violence hotline
Fraud hotline
Parents of murdered children
Sexual violence resource center
Rape, abuse and incest network and others
If we are truly a nation who cares for eachother and others around the world how would you explain that to another country if these were on our resume?
60 years ago God began being removed from society, from politics and public school, we have become a nation of increased government, corruption and the intense desire to create laws. Are these laws and increase in government to replace our own individual common sense or do we no longer have any.
We are truly a nation who is under the influence. Is our nation truly better of without God, the evidence is there for you to decide.
The bible says, A country or government that does not serve me shall perish.
Isaiah 60:12
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
Religion in Civil Government?
RELIGION IN CIVIL GOVERNMENT
Have religions played a role in governments in history or did they believe in the separation of church and state America does? What do you suppose the effects were or would be regarding government of these cultures?
Sometimes the best and most accurate way to understand any perspective would be to read the quotes of philosophers in the age in which they lived to understand their history.
Quotes like:
“It is not personal but civil righteousness with which we are immediately concerned; not religion as it achieves salvation of the soul but religion as it exalts a nation.”
“Governments and civilizations of all people are typed and determined by the character of their religions whether the religion is true or false. The mightiest thing in a nation’s heart is its religion.”
“Men’s thinking in the political field is in great part to his convictions related to his spiritual field.”
Rousseau quoted: “Never was a state founded that didn’t have a religion for its basis.”
“All civil institutions of the ancient world were the outgrowth of religious beliefs. Nations were governed as gods directed, kings ruled, judges gave opinions, soldiers fought, generals planned and all gave great reverence to their deity.”
The Roman Empire whether pagan or Christian from Romulus to Charlemagne never thought to rule without seeking guidance from their divinity. Both heathen and Christians have regarded religion as the basis of their commonwealth as a soul condition of national existence.
Plutarch, Plato’s most diligent disciple stated: “There was never a state created by Atheists- You will never find a city without God and prayer at its foundation.”
Napoleon quoted: “Religion as a national force is a mystery of social order- One can’t govern without it otherwise the dignity and independence of a nation are disturbed at every moment.”
Lord Erskine, England’s greatest constitutional attorney when speaking of the Christian religion said: “Depend upon it, the world could not be held together without it.”
Men such as Plato, Plutarch, Napoleon, Rousseau, Kishub Chunder and many others acknowledged the fact that without Christianity as the cornerstone of civil government there would be a lack of morality, social order and corruption at every level.
They understood that Christianity was not only to save men but man, not teaching so much about how to die, but how to live as members of society. Did our elected officials in early America understand the importance of religion in government and the reverence they had for God to bless and protect this new nation, proof can be found in the establishment of every state constitution in America for example:
“Georgia 1777: We the people of Georgia relying on the protection and guidance of Almighty God do ordain and establish this constitution.”
They believed that banishing the bible from the land would allow people to loose their minds causing the experiment in self government to be a failure. Knowing political atheism would produce political anarchy in addition to a nation without a conscience, that it will know no rule of right but only by might and that it would pervert the law into license and make authority and cruel tyranny synonymous.
The destruction of religion would be the destruction of morality and the ruin of the state. These men understood that civil government required support from religious liberty and will not prosper without it, citing that ‘they would be no different than brute beasts.”
“Civil governments and their administrations differ as religions differ.”
It can be said that all governments of all non-Christian countries are despotic and without spiritual liberty there can be no civil freedom.
Some great examples are the “reign of terror.” It was considered one of the bloodiest chapters in France’s history with its continual revolutions just after the National assembly past a resolution declaring that “There was no God.”
In other countries, the despotisms of the East are not accidents but legitimate results of the Koran, The persecutions of Christians by Nero in Rome were despotic until the church triumphed over the state and freedom began to be re-established. Japan, China, and India are the social and political expressions of their religions, molding thought, legislation and public policies. The Koran has a monarchy and a corrupt oligarchy which are a despotic combination where the ruling of the country is in the interest of only a few people.
Regardless of any religion the story is much the same, heartless tyranny, suffering slaves fetishes, idolatries, and oppressive traditions none that offer the individual liberty of Christianity.
It was quoted that “If political freedom is desired it is important to look to the states like Holland, England and Scotland, for they are the ones who have known and believed in the Christian religion as the cornerstone of their governments and the prosperity and blessings that come from the faith in Jesus Christ.”
“The social and political force of any religion is measured by the strength of the family and the rights of the individual.” That every religion must be measured by the man it produces…As is man so is his religion and is his religion so is the nation.”
Lets look at some examples:
BUDDHISM:
Paralyses personality by preaching annihilation.
To know misery and to escape
Demands reduction in powers of affection and
To achieve “the ultimate state of non-existence.”
Their mantra:
“Know that, whatever thou has been, tis something better not to be.”
CONFUCIANISM:
Creates impoverished personality
Stating that religion is a reflection, it
Opposes progress
Teaches nothing regarding mans relation to God.
Lifeless, spiritless,
Nothing to develop virtues
No stimulation or aspiration to satisfy spiritual hunger.
China’s combination of Confucianism and Buddhism, have been responsible for it’s changeless past, sitting by by the grave, emulating the dead and dwelling among the tombs.
Their mantra:
“There is no future but the past.”
HINDUISM:
Degrades personality
Suppressing development of individual character,
Brutalizing conscience
Destroys moral distinctions
No sympathy or compassion
Hardening the heart
Intensifying selfishness
Hindu’s also have no social unity or national sentiment.
They believe that people cannot rise higher than the conceptions of the gods they worship.
For example, what would it be like to never rise higher than:
VISHNU: Who has four arms, who is half bird, half man and part serpent
or
SIVA: Monster with three eyes, riding naked on a bull wearing a necklace of skulls.
ISLAM:
Enslaves personality
Demands intellectual slavery
Domestic slavery with harems
The state enforces religious and civil slavery
No individual rights
The Koran offers a premium for war, the highest rewards for killing the most infidels.
“The end justifies the means”allowing deception, lying, persecution. The commerce suffers and the harvests cease as the famines become more prevalent. This is considered the largest religion of intolerance and persecution of others who are not in line with Islam.
CHRISTIANITY:
Promotes individual liberty, dignity and unalienable rights
Every human soul has intrinsic value
Cries advance and to move forward acknowledging His love for us and our love for others.
The doctrine that the state must guarantee the protection of life, along with the dignity, moral worth, national and individual conscience and the concept of international law are all Christian concepts unlike that of kings and priests who believe they owned the people our culture lives on the premise of the universal brotherhood.
Plato said: “A religion that fails to purify the home is powerless to elevate a nation.’
Wendell Phillips quoted: “The answer to Shasters is India, the answer to the Koran is Turkey, the answer to the Bible is the Christian civilization of Europe and America, Romanism to Spain and Mexico and Atheism to the “reign of terror” in France, the “Commune in Paris” and the moral decline of any nation of which has become tolerant of the establishments of it’s principles.
When one views the history and cultures of other nations, can our American Christian heritage and it’s influence in civil government really be denied?
The nation and the kingdom that will not serve thee shall perish.
Isaiah 60:12
Have religions played a role in governments in history or did they believe in the separation of church and state America does? What do you suppose the effects were or would be regarding government of these cultures?
Sometimes the best and most accurate way to understand any perspective would be to read the quotes of philosophers in the age in which they lived to understand their history.
Quotes like:
“It is not personal but civil righteousness with which we are immediately concerned; not religion as it achieves salvation of the soul but religion as it exalts a nation.”
“Governments and civilizations of all people are typed and determined by the character of their religions whether the religion is true or false. The mightiest thing in a nation’s heart is its religion.”
“Men’s thinking in the political field is in great part to his convictions related to his spiritual field.”
Rousseau quoted: “Never was a state founded that didn’t have a religion for its basis.”
“All civil institutions of the ancient world were the outgrowth of religious beliefs. Nations were governed as gods directed, kings ruled, judges gave opinions, soldiers fought, generals planned and all gave great reverence to their deity.”
The Roman Empire whether pagan or Christian from Romulus to Charlemagne never thought to rule without seeking guidance from their divinity. Both heathen and Christians have regarded religion as the basis of their commonwealth as a soul condition of national existence.
Plutarch, Plato’s most diligent disciple stated: “There was never a state created by Atheists- You will never find a city without God and prayer at its foundation.”
Napoleon quoted: “Religion as a national force is a mystery of social order- One can’t govern without it otherwise the dignity and independence of a nation are disturbed at every moment.”
Lord Erskine, England’s greatest constitutional attorney when speaking of the Christian religion said: “Depend upon it, the world could not be held together without it.”
Men such as Plato, Plutarch, Napoleon, Rousseau, Kishub Chunder and many others acknowledged the fact that without Christianity as the cornerstone of civil government there would be a lack of morality, social order and corruption at every level.
They understood that Christianity was not only to save men but man, not teaching so much about how to die, but how to live as members of society. Did our elected officials in early America understand the importance of religion in government and the reverence they had for God to bless and protect this new nation, proof can be found in the establishment of every state constitution in America for example:
“Georgia 1777: We the people of Georgia relying on the protection and guidance of Almighty God do ordain and establish this constitution.”
They believed that banishing the bible from the land would allow people to loose their minds causing the experiment in self government to be a failure. Knowing political atheism would produce political anarchy in addition to a nation without a conscience, that it will know no rule of right but only by might and that it would pervert the law into license and make authority and cruel tyranny synonymous.
The destruction of religion would be the destruction of morality and the ruin of the state. These men understood that civil government required support from religious liberty and will not prosper without it, citing that ‘they would be no different than brute beasts.”
“Civil governments and their administrations differ as religions differ.”
It can be said that all governments of all non-Christian countries are despotic and without spiritual liberty there can be no civil freedom.
Some great examples are the “reign of terror.” It was considered one of the bloodiest chapters in France’s history with its continual revolutions just after the National assembly past a resolution declaring that “There was no God.”
In other countries, the despotisms of the East are not accidents but legitimate results of the Koran, The persecutions of Christians by Nero in Rome were despotic until the church triumphed over the state and freedom began to be re-established. Japan, China, and India are the social and political expressions of their religions, molding thought, legislation and public policies. The Koran has a monarchy and a corrupt oligarchy which are a despotic combination where the ruling of the country is in the interest of only a few people.
Regardless of any religion the story is much the same, heartless tyranny, suffering slaves fetishes, idolatries, and oppressive traditions none that offer the individual liberty of Christianity.
It was quoted that “If political freedom is desired it is important to look to the states like Holland, England and Scotland, for they are the ones who have known and believed in the Christian religion as the cornerstone of their governments and the prosperity and blessings that come from the faith in Jesus Christ.”
“The social and political force of any religion is measured by the strength of the family and the rights of the individual.” That every religion must be measured by the man it produces…As is man so is his religion and is his religion so is the nation.”
Lets look at some examples:
BUDDHISM:
Paralyses personality by preaching annihilation.
To know misery and to escape
Demands reduction in powers of affection and
To achieve “the ultimate state of non-existence.”
Their mantra:
“Know that, whatever thou has been, tis something better not to be.”
CONFUCIANISM:
Creates impoverished personality
Stating that religion is a reflection, it
Opposes progress
Teaches nothing regarding mans relation to God.
Lifeless, spiritless,
Nothing to develop virtues
No stimulation or aspiration to satisfy spiritual hunger.
China’s combination of Confucianism and Buddhism, have been responsible for it’s changeless past, sitting by by the grave, emulating the dead and dwelling among the tombs.
Their mantra:
“There is no future but the past.”
HINDUISM:
Degrades personality
Suppressing development of individual character,
Brutalizing conscience
Destroys moral distinctions
No sympathy or compassion
Hardening the heart
Intensifying selfishness
Hindu’s also have no social unity or national sentiment.
They believe that people cannot rise higher than the conceptions of the gods they worship.
For example, what would it be like to never rise higher than:
VISHNU: Who has four arms, who is half bird, half man and part serpent
or
SIVA: Monster with three eyes, riding naked on a bull wearing a necklace of skulls.
ISLAM:
Enslaves personality
Demands intellectual slavery
Domestic slavery with harems
The state enforces religious and civil slavery
No individual rights
The Koran offers a premium for war, the highest rewards for killing the most infidels.
“The end justifies the means”allowing deception, lying, persecution. The commerce suffers and the harvests cease as the famines become more prevalent. This is considered the largest religion of intolerance and persecution of others who are not in line with Islam.
CHRISTIANITY:
Promotes individual liberty, dignity and unalienable rights
Every human soul has intrinsic value
Cries advance and to move forward acknowledging His love for us and our love for others.
The doctrine that the state must guarantee the protection of life, along with the dignity, moral worth, national and individual conscience and the concept of international law are all Christian concepts unlike that of kings and priests who believe they owned the people our culture lives on the premise of the universal brotherhood.
Plato said: “A religion that fails to purify the home is powerless to elevate a nation.’
Wendell Phillips quoted: “The answer to Shasters is India, the answer to the Koran is Turkey, the answer to the Bible is the Christian civilization of Europe and America, Romanism to Spain and Mexico and Atheism to the “reign of terror” in France, the “Commune in Paris” and the moral decline of any nation of which has become tolerant of the establishments of it’s principles.
When one views the history and cultures of other nations, can our American Christian heritage and it’s influence in civil government really be denied?
The nation and the kingdom that will not serve thee shall perish.
Isaiah 60:12
Sunday, October 18, 2009
Obama to cede US sovereignty? The beacon dims
Many, including myself, have considered Obama a Liar on many different levels with all of the broken promises he made and his complete lack of "promised" transparency but perhaps the most obvious lie was his promise when he swore to Uphold the Constitution of the United States.
The links and articles below provide evidence that Obama, with the help of others before him, ( but Obama will be the one who signs) has sold this country down the road establishing the "change" he has promised, sugar coated it to make people believe that he still had some sort of respect for what this country has stood for for so many years and now made clear he obviously does not.
Will the people rise up before it is too late or will we allow ourselves to lose our sovereignty never to have it again, we will certainly see what happens.
http://www.lvrj.com/news/oath-keepers-pledges-to-prevent-dictatorship-in-united-states-64690232.html
Here is Lord Monckton to explain what is poised to happen THIS DECEMBER!!!:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMe5dOgbu40
Here is the article to support this video:
http://fightinwordsusa.wordpress.com/2009/10/15/obama-poised-to-cede-us-soverignty-claims-british-lord/
Obama Poised to Cede US Sovereignty, Claims British LordOctober 15, 2009 at 6:17 am In Political 176 Comments
by Walter Scott Hudson
The Minnesota Free Market Institute hosted an event at Bethel University in St. Paul on Wednesday evening. Keynote speaker Lord Christopher Monckton, former science adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, gave a scathing and lengthy presentation, complete with detailed charts, graphs, facts, and figures which culminated in the utter decimation of both the pop culture concept of global warming and the credible threat of any significant anthropomorphic climate change.
A detailed summary of Monckton’s presentation will be available here once compiled. However, a segment of his remarks justify immediate publication. If credible, the concern Monckton speaks to may well prove the single most important issue facing the American nation, bigger than health care, bigger than cap and trade, and worth every citizen’s focused attention.
Here were Monckton’s closing remarks, as dictated from my audio recording:
At [the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in] Copenhagen, this December, weeks away, a treaty will be signed. Your president will sign it. Most of the third world countries will sign it, because they think they’re going to get money out of it. Most of the left-wing regime from the European Union will rubber stamp it. Virtually nobody won’t sign it.
I read that treaty. And what it says is this, that a world government is going to be created. The word “government” actually appears as the first of three purposes of the new entity. The second purpose is the transfer of wealth from the countries of the West to third world countries, in satisfication of what is called, coyly, “climate debt” – because we’ve been burning CO2 and they haven’t. We’ve been screwing up the climate and they haven’t. And the third purpose of this new entity, this government, is enforcement.
How many of you think that the word “election” or “democracy” or “vote” or “ballot” occurs anywhere in the 200 pages of that treaty? Quite right, it doesn’t appear once. So, at last, the communists who piled out of the Berlin Wall and into the environmental movement, who took over Greenpeace so that my friends who funded it left within a year, because [the communists] captured it – Now the apotheosis as at hand.
They are about to impose a communist world government on the world. You have a president who has very strong sympathies with that point of view. He’s going to sign it. He’ll sign anything. He’s a Nobel Peace Prize [winner]; of course he’ll sign it.
[laughter]
And the trouble is this; if that treaty is signed, if your Constitution says that it takes precedence over your Constitution (sic), and you can’t resign from that treaty unless you get agreement from all the other state parties – And because you’ll be the biggest paying country, they’re not going to let you out of it.
So, thank you, America. You were the beacon of freedom to the world. It is a privilege merely to stand on this soil of freedom while it is still free. But, in the next few weeks, unless you stop it, your president will sign your freedom, your democracy, and your prosparity away forever.
And neither you nor any subsequent government you may elect will have any power whatsoever to take it back. That is how serious it is. I’ve read the treaty. I’ve seen this stuff about [world] government and climate debt and enforcement. They are going to do this to you whether you like it or not.
But I think it is here, here in your great nation, which I so love and I so admire – it is here that perhaps, at this eleventh hour, at the fifty-ninth minute and fifty-ninth second, you will rise up and you will stop your president from signing that dreadful treaty, that purposeless treaty. For there is no problem with climate and, even if there were, an economic treaty does nothing to [help] it.
So I end by saying to you the words that Winston Churchill addressed to your president in the darkest hour before the dawn of freedom in the Second World War. He quoted from your great poet Longfellow:
Sail on, O Ship of State!
Sail on, O Union, strong and great!
Humanity with all its fears,With all the hopes of future years,Is hanging breathless on thy fate!
Lord Monckton received a standing ovation and took a series of questions from members of the audience. Among those questions were these relevent to the forthcoming Copenhagen treaty:
Question: The current administration and the Democratic majority in Congress has shown little regard for the will of the people. They’re trying to pass a serious government agenda, and serious taxation and burdens on future generations. And there seems to be little to stop them. How do you propose we stop Obama from doing this, because I see no way to stop him from signing anything in Copenhagen. I believe that’s his agenda and he’ll do it.
I don’t minimize the difficulty. But on this subject – I don’t really do politics, because it’s not right. In the end, your politics is for you. The correct procedure is for you to get onto your representatives, both in the US Senate where the bill has yet to go through (you can try and stop that) and in [the House], and get them to demand their right of audience (which they all have) with the president and tell him about this treaty.
There are many very powerful people in this room, wealthy people, influential people. Get onto the media, tell them about this treaty. If they go to www.wattsupwiththat.com, they will find (if they look carefully enough) a copy of that treaty, because I arranged for it to be posted there not so long ago.
Let them read it, and let the press tell the people that their democracy is about to be taken away for no good purpose, at least [with] no scientific basis [in reference to climate change]. Tell the press to say this. Tell the press to say that, even if there is a problem [with climate change], you don’t want your democracy taken away. It really is as simple as that.
Question: Is it really irrevocable if that treaty is signed? Suppose it’s signed by someone who does not have the authority, as I – I have some, a high degree of skepticism that we do have a valid president there because I -
I know at least one judge who shares your opinion, sir, yes.
I don’t believe it until I see it. … Would [Obama's potential illegitimacy as president] give us a reasonable cause to nullify whatever treaty that he does sign as president?
I would be very careful not to rely on things like that. Although there is a certain amount of doubt whether or not he was born in Hawaii, my fear is it would be very difficult to prove he wasn’t born in Hawaii and therefore we might not be able to get anywhere with that.
Besides, once he’s signed that treaty, whether or not he signed it validly, once he’s signed it and ratified it – your Senate ratifies it – you’re bound by it. But I will say one thing; they know, in the White House, that they won’t be able to get the 67 votes in the Senate, the two-thirds majority that your Constitution has stipulated must be achieved in order to ratify a treaty of this kind.
However, what they’ve worked out is this – and they actually let it slip during the election campaign, which is how I know about it. They plan to enact that Copenhagen treaty into legislation by a simple majority of both houses. That they can do. But the virtue of that – and here you have a point – is that is, thank God, reversible. So I want you to pray tonight, and pray hard for your Senate that they utterly refuse to ratify the [new] Treaty of Copenhagen, because if they refuse to ratify it and [Obama] has to push it through as domestic legislation, you can repeal it.
Regardless of whether global warming is taking place or caused to any degree by human activity, we do not want a global government empowered to tax Americans without elected representation or anything analogous to constitutional protections. The Founding Fathers would roll over in their graves if they knew their progeny allowed a foreign power such authority, effectively undoing their every effort in an act of Anti-American Revolution.
If that is our imminent course, we need to put all else on hold and focus on stopping it. If American sovereignty is ceded, all other debate is irrelevant.
Edited to add @ 8:31 am:
Skimming through the treaty, I came across verification of Monckton’s assessment of the new entity’s purpose:
38. The scheme for the new institutional arrangement under the Convention will be based on three basic pillars: government; facilitative mechanism; and financial mechanism, and the basic organization of which will include the following:
World Government (heading added)(a) The government will be ruled by the COP with the support of a new subsidiary body on adaptation, and of an Executive Board responsible for the management of the new funds and the related facilitative processes and bodies. The current Convention secretariat will operate as such, as appropriate.
To Redistribute Wealth (heading added)b) The Convention’s financial mechanism will include a multilateral climate change fund including five windows:
(a) an Adaptation window,
(b) a Compensation window, to address loss and damage from climate change impacts [read: the "climate debt" Monckton refers to], including insurance, rehabilitation and compensatory components,
© a Technology window;
(d) a Mitigation window; and
(e) a REDD window, to support a multi-phases process for positive forest incentives relating to REDD actions.
With Enforcement Authority (heading added)© The Convention’s facilitative mechanism will include:
(a) work programmes for adaptation and mitigation;
(b) a long-term REDD process;
© a short-term technology action plan;
(d) an expert group on adaptation established by the subsidiary body on adaptation, and expert groups on mitigation, technologies and on monitoring, reporting and verification; and
(e) an international registry for the monitoring, reporting and verification of compliance of emission reduction commitments, and the transfer of technical and financial resources from developed countries to developing countries. The secretariat will provide technical and administrative support, including a new centre for information exchange [read; enforcement].
I guess here we are folks, the 11th hour, the 59th minute, the loss of American sovereignty. Everything we have fought and died for, the sacrifices that were made, the struggles made to keep this nation free is all about tomave been made in vain.
America, as I have said many times before, WAKE UP!!!
The links and articles below provide evidence that Obama, with the help of others before him, ( but Obama will be the one who signs) has sold this country down the road establishing the "change" he has promised, sugar coated it to make people believe that he still had some sort of respect for what this country has stood for for so many years and now made clear he obviously does not.
Will the people rise up before it is too late or will we allow ourselves to lose our sovereignty never to have it again, we will certainly see what happens.
http://www.lvrj.com/news/oath-keepers-pledges-to-prevent-dictatorship-in-united-states-64690232.html
Here is Lord Monckton to explain what is poised to happen THIS DECEMBER!!!:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMe5dOgbu40
Here is the article to support this video:
http://fightinwordsusa.wordpress.com/2009/10/15/obama-poised-to-cede-us-soverignty-claims-british-lord/
Obama Poised to Cede US Sovereignty, Claims British LordOctober 15, 2009 at 6:17 am In Political 176 Comments
by Walter Scott Hudson
The Minnesota Free Market Institute hosted an event at Bethel University in St. Paul on Wednesday evening. Keynote speaker Lord Christopher Monckton, former science adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, gave a scathing and lengthy presentation, complete with detailed charts, graphs, facts, and figures which culminated in the utter decimation of both the pop culture concept of global warming and the credible threat of any significant anthropomorphic climate change.
A detailed summary of Monckton’s presentation will be available here once compiled. However, a segment of his remarks justify immediate publication. If credible, the concern Monckton speaks to may well prove the single most important issue facing the American nation, bigger than health care, bigger than cap and trade, and worth every citizen’s focused attention.
Here were Monckton’s closing remarks, as dictated from my audio recording:
At [the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in] Copenhagen, this December, weeks away, a treaty will be signed. Your president will sign it. Most of the third world countries will sign it, because they think they’re going to get money out of it. Most of the left-wing regime from the European Union will rubber stamp it. Virtually nobody won’t sign it.
I read that treaty. And what it says is this, that a world government is going to be created. The word “government” actually appears as the first of three purposes of the new entity. The second purpose is the transfer of wealth from the countries of the West to third world countries, in satisfication of what is called, coyly, “climate debt” – because we’ve been burning CO2 and they haven’t. We’ve been screwing up the climate and they haven’t. And the third purpose of this new entity, this government, is enforcement.
How many of you think that the word “election” or “democracy” or “vote” or “ballot” occurs anywhere in the 200 pages of that treaty? Quite right, it doesn’t appear once. So, at last, the communists who piled out of the Berlin Wall and into the environmental movement, who took over Greenpeace so that my friends who funded it left within a year, because [the communists] captured it – Now the apotheosis as at hand.
They are about to impose a communist world government on the world. You have a president who has very strong sympathies with that point of view. He’s going to sign it. He’ll sign anything. He’s a Nobel Peace Prize [winner]; of course he’ll sign it.
[laughter]
And the trouble is this; if that treaty is signed, if your Constitution says that it takes precedence over your Constitution (sic), and you can’t resign from that treaty unless you get agreement from all the other state parties – And because you’ll be the biggest paying country, they’re not going to let you out of it.
So, thank you, America. You were the beacon of freedom to the world. It is a privilege merely to stand on this soil of freedom while it is still free. But, in the next few weeks, unless you stop it, your president will sign your freedom, your democracy, and your prosparity away forever.
And neither you nor any subsequent government you may elect will have any power whatsoever to take it back. That is how serious it is. I’ve read the treaty. I’ve seen this stuff about [world] government and climate debt and enforcement. They are going to do this to you whether you like it or not.
But I think it is here, here in your great nation, which I so love and I so admire – it is here that perhaps, at this eleventh hour, at the fifty-ninth minute and fifty-ninth second, you will rise up and you will stop your president from signing that dreadful treaty, that purposeless treaty. For there is no problem with climate and, even if there were, an economic treaty does nothing to [help] it.
So I end by saying to you the words that Winston Churchill addressed to your president in the darkest hour before the dawn of freedom in the Second World War. He quoted from your great poet Longfellow:
Sail on, O Ship of State!
Sail on, O Union, strong and great!
Humanity with all its fears,With all the hopes of future years,Is hanging breathless on thy fate!
Lord Monckton received a standing ovation and took a series of questions from members of the audience. Among those questions were these relevent to the forthcoming Copenhagen treaty:
Question: The current administration and the Democratic majority in Congress has shown little regard for the will of the people. They’re trying to pass a serious government agenda, and serious taxation and burdens on future generations. And there seems to be little to stop them. How do you propose we stop Obama from doing this, because I see no way to stop him from signing anything in Copenhagen. I believe that’s his agenda and he’ll do it.
I don’t minimize the difficulty. But on this subject – I don’t really do politics, because it’s not right. In the end, your politics is for you. The correct procedure is for you to get onto your representatives, both in the US Senate where the bill has yet to go through (you can try and stop that) and in [the House], and get them to demand their right of audience (which they all have) with the president and tell him about this treaty.
There are many very powerful people in this room, wealthy people, influential people. Get onto the media, tell them about this treaty. If they go to www.wattsupwiththat.com, they will find (if they look carefully enough) a copy of that treaty, because I arranged for it to be posted there not so long ago.
Let them read it, and let the press tell the people that their democracy is about to be taken away for no good purpose, at least [with] no scientific basis [in reference to climate change]. Tell the press to say this. Tell the press to say that, even if there is a problem [with climate change], you don’t want your democracy taken away. It really is as simple as that.
Question: Is it really irrevocable if that treaty is signed? Suppose it’s signed by someone who does not have the authority, as I – I have some, a high degree of skepticism that we do have a valid president there because I -
I know at least one judge who shares your opinion, sir, yes.
I don’t believe it until I see it. … Would [Obama's potential illegitimacy as president] give us a reasonable cause to nullify whatever treaty that he does sign as president?
I would be very careful not to rely on things like that. Although there is a certain amount of doubt whether or not he was born in Hawaii, my fear is it would be very difficult to prove he wasn’t born in Hawaii and therefore we might not be able to get anywhere with that.
Besides, once he’s signed that treaty, whether or not he signed it validly, once he’s signed it and ratified it – your Senate ratifies it – you’re bound by it. But I will say one thing; they know, in the White House, that they won’t be able to get the 67 votes in the Senate, the two-thirds majority that your Constitution has stipulated must be achieved in order to ratify a treaty of this kind.
However, what they’ve worked out is this – and they actually let it slip during the election campaign, which is how I know about it. They plan to enact that Copenhagen treaty into legislation by a simple majority of both houses. That they can do. But the virtue of that – and here you have a point – is that is, thank God, reversible. So I want you to pray tonight, and pray hard for your Senate that they utterly refuse to ratify the [new] Treaty of Copenhagen, because if they refuse to ratify it and [Obama] has to push it through as domestic legislation, you can repeal it.
Regardless of whether global warming is taking place or caused to any degree by human activity, we do not want a global government empowered to tax Americans without elected representation or anything analogous to constitutional protections. The Founding Fathers would roll over in their graves if they knew their progeny allowed a foreign power such authority, effectively undoing their every effort in an act of Anti-American Revolution.
If that is our imminent course, we need to put all else on hold and focus on stopping it. If American sovereignty is ceded, all other debate is irrelevant.
Edited to add @ 8:31 am:
Skimming through the treaty, I came across verification of Monckton’s assessment of the new entity’s purpose:
38. The scheme for the new institutional arrangement under the Convention will be based on three basic pillars: government; facilitative mechanism; and financial mechanism, and the basic organization of which will include the following:
World Government (heading added)(a) The government will be ruled by the COP with the support of a new subsidiary body on adaptation, and of an Executive Board responsible for the management of the new funds and the related facilitative processes and bodies. The current Convention secretariat will operate as such, as appropriate.
To Redistribute Wealth (heading added)b) The Convention’s financial mechanism will include a multilateral climate change fund including five windows:
(a) an Adaptation window,
(b) a Compensation window, to address loss and damage from climate change impacts [read: the "climate debt" Monckton refers to], including insurance, rehabilitation and compensatory components,
© a Technology window;
(d) a Mitigation window; and
(e) a REDD window, to support a multi-phases process for positive forest incentives relating to REDD actions.
With Enforcement Authority (heading added)© The Convention’s facilitative mechanism will include:
(a) work programmes for adaptation and mitigation;
(b) a long-term REDD process;
© a short-term technology action plan;
(d) an expert group on adaptation established by the subsidiary body on adaptation, and expert groups on mitigation, technologies and on monitoring, reporting and verification; and
(e) an international registry for the monitoring, reporting and verification of compliance of emission reduction commitments, and the transfer of technical and financial resources from developed countries to developing countries. The secretariat will provide technical and administrative support, including a new centre for information exchange [read; enforcement].
I guess here we are folks, the 11th hour, the 59th minute, the loss of American sovereignty. Everything we have fought and died for, the sacrifices that were made, the struggles made to keep this nation free is all about tomave been made in vain.
America, as I have said many times before, WAKE UP!!!
Thursday, October 15, 2009
Vaccine information for 10-15-2009
So much for the "politics and religion" continuity for my posts, focus has been shifted to expose our out of control government and it's , as promised, "transparent" schemes.
The last few posts have given information overload on the truth about the vaccines and the agenda behind them but wanted to keep the new information up to date as find it.
It seems that Americans are finally waking up to the fact that something is wrong...finally!
Here are a few links that you may find of interest:
Flu vaccines revealed as the greatest quackery ever pushed in the history of medicine
(NaturalNews) Prepare to have your world rocked. What you're about to read here will leave you astonished, inspired and outraged all at the same time. You're about to be treated to some little-known information demonstrating why seasonal flu vaccines...
Tragic side effects: marathon runner suffers side effects from vaccine in August-Irreversible!
http://thepeopleschemist.com/blog/
Squalene related not only to Gulf war syndrome...
(email from a friend)
"It IS in the swine flu vaccine in Canada, Europe and Australia. It's supposedly not in U.S. vaccine -- yet -- but will be eventually I bet.
Squalene (an adjuvant) may or may not have been the only culprit associated with Gulf War Syndrome ... but our men & women were forced to take experimental vaccines (they had no choice) and now many, many Gulf War vets have medical issues like sleep disorders, seizures, depression, ALS, MS, etc.
It took over a decade for Govt to admit it exists but GWS funding has been yanked significantly yet tens of thousands (or more) of Gulf war vets continue to suffer and deteriorate.
And yes, I'm aware Govt and Big Pharma claim flu vaccine is safe due to "clinical trials" ... but it's the LONG term damage I fear. Many debilitating symptoms didn't hit vets until years later ... so please think about and discuss this option with your family members and physicians. Or contact a local Naturopath for alternative solutions to boost your immune systems (e.g. Vit D3, fish oil, Vit C, good multiple, quercetin, NAC, turmeric, etc.)
Obviously this is a very personal (and difficult) choice -- many flu symptoms are mild (mine lasted less than 20 hours and my husband's lasted 2-3 days) but others do have trouble with this flu. And yes, I worry about strain mutations but I'm also concerned about billions of people taking a vaccine being rammed down our throats when there are still so many unanswered questions.
The Mercury News ( http://www.mercurynews.com/peninsula/ci_13555627 )
U.S. could potentially use controversial adjuvants in swine flu vaccine
The World Health Organization estimates that a worldwide production capacity of 3 billion doses of pandemic H1N1 vaccines will be used to prevent the outbreak and spread of the 2009 H1N1 flu, or "swine flu," as it is better known. This ambitious plan for widespread vaccine use, albeit inadequate for a total population of 6.8 billion people, has drawn criticism regarding the vaccine's safety, and the use and potential use of vaccine adjuvants.
In the alternative health community, chiropractor Ginger Mills, DC, of Redwood City, is concerned that adjuvants, especially squalene, will be added to vaccines used in the U.S., should the number of cases rise. "Squalene is an oil that is found in olives and in certain other foods, and is perfectly healthy when you ingest it — but when injected into the bloodstream, it can have adverse effects."
Adjuvants enhance or "supercharge" the immune response, reduce the number of vaccines needed, and allow supplies to last longer. Currently, aluminum salts are the only approved vaccine adjuvants for use in the United States. The use of adjuvants has been suspected, but not confirmed, in the development of illnesses in Gulf War veterans who may have received squalene-containing anthrax vaccines.
However, the current stock of U.S. swine flu vaccines does not contain adjuvants, according to Anne Schuchat, MD, in an informational video produced by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Schuchat does acknowledge that there is an emergency provision to use adjuvants — should the pandemic accelerate.
Adjuvants are being used in swine flu vaccines in countries outside of the United States, including Canada, Europe and Australia. However, even though Canada is using an adjuvanted vaccine, it has also ordered 1.8 million doses of the unadjuvanted vaccine for use in pregnant women and children under the age of 3.
...
Maine physician Meryl Nass, MD, has written widely on the use of vaccines. "If novel adjuvants do get added (in the U.S.) — only if conditions change — it would preclude the quick licensure process that took place for the licensed H1N1 vaccines. Recipients would need to sign an informed consent for an experimental product," said Nass. "I do not believe they would be 'secretly' added."( yeah right!)
With a pivotal and profitable role played by the pharmaceutical industry in vaccine production, Nass suggests that there is a lack of "unconflicted data" available about adjuvants. "Nearly all of the MF59 (adjuvant) data were derived from the manufacturer of MF59, for example," said Nass. "It is more the lack of reliable data, and gives the impression that something is being hidden.
Those of us who are familiar with the subject are concerned that if these adjuvants were used en masse, we would face some bad outcomes. The FDA has been sitting on them for 10 years, and usually, that means that the FDA is aware of significant problems."
Swine flu vaccine support crumbles as flimsy rationale for H1N1 shots becomes apparent.
Monday, October 12, 2009 by: Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor
(NaturalNews)--
Public support for the swine flu vaccine is evaporating by the day as the rationale for the vaccine appears increasingly ludicrous to anyone paying attention.
Moms, nurses, day care workers and members of the general public are increasingly realizing that Big Pharma's rationale for swine flu vaccination just doesn't add up.
Recent polls conducted by the mainstream media indicate that more than fifty percent of moms are refusing to expose their children to the swine flu vaccine, and nurses and health practitioners across the US and UK are going vocal with their opposition to the vaccine.
Legal action against the FDA's approval of the swine flu vaccine is already underway and public protests are gaining momentum in raising awareness about the primary objections to the swine flu vaccine. Intelligent, informed people everywhere are saying NO to this vaccine!
Popular support for the vaccine is crumbling by the day, and health authorities are now turning to exaggerated scare stories to try to drum up demand for their vaccines. Where scientific credibility is lacking, fear is being invoked in its place.
Why the swine flu vaccine doesn't add up.
So why is the justification for the swine flu so flimsy?
It all comes down to these five crucial reasons being pushed by the vaccine industry... but as you'll see below, each of these five reasons is demonstrably false! ( Remember the reasons listed are false not truths!)
Reason #1) The H1N1 swine flu pandemic is dangerous and deadly!
Why it's flimsy: While the infection rate of H1N1 is currently high, the fatality rate is remarkably low. In fact, it's no higher than a normal, seasonal flu.
Reason #2) The vaccine protects you from the virus!
Why it's flimsy: There is absolutely no scientific evidence demonstrating that the swine flu vaccine offers real-world protection against the circulating H1N1 virus.
While there is evidence showing that it produces antibodies, as people who have studied vaccine effectiveness already know, the mere existence of vaccine-induced antibodies doesn't directly translate into functional, real-world immunity! Vaccines are often, in effect, fabricated immunity that often don't provide practical immune defense in the real world.
Reason #3) The vaccine is perfectly safe, even for kids!
Why it's flimsy: This reason is truly laughable. None of these vaccines have been properly safety tested by the FDA or the drug companies.
They were approved by the FDA with a waiver, utterly bypassing the normal process of long-term safety testing that the public expects the FDA to enforce.
In fact, according to attorney Jim Turner, the FDA's baseless approval of these swine flu vaccines is a violation of federal law.
http://www.naturalnews.com/027205_vaccines_swine_flu_the_FDA.html
(See lawsuit filed)
Reason #4) There's nothing else you can do to protect yourself from the swine flu (therefore you must take the vaccine shot).
Why it's flimsy: This reason is an outright lie.
In order to sell more vaccines, the pharmaceutical industry (and all its bureaucratic cohorts at the CDC and WHO) are intentionally keeping people ignorant of far safer and more effective options such as vitamin D and anti-viral herbal remedies.
Reason #5) If you don't take the vaccine shot, you're being unethical by placing the shot burden on everyone else without taking it yourself.
Why it's flimsy: Hilarious! This is marketing by guilt -- trying to arm-twist people into the vaccine shot by making them feel guilty if they don't.
The truth is that you're being unethical if you DO get the shot because you're financially supporting a dangerous and highly deceptive vaccine industry that's causing tremendous harm to children, expectant mothers and other innocent vaccination victims.
Hoping to improve your health by handing money to the pharmaceutical industry through the purchase of vaccines is sort of like hoping to create world peace by writing a check to weapons manufacturers.
No good reason to get the vaccine
Is there any good reason to get the swine flu vaccine?
Not based on the current situation, no. Unless you have a strong desire to play Russian Roulette with your health, of course.
Of course, if things dramatically change, there could be increasingly strong reasons for considering a vaccine.
If the H1N1 virus mutates into a virus with a very high fatality rate, things might be different.
If the vaccine were proven safe with adequate long-term testing, that would be something working in its favor.
If the vaccines were scientifically shown to actually protect you from the virus, then that would be different, too.
But to date, none of these things are verifiably true!
The vaccines haven't been properly tested at all.
There's no honest evidence demonstrating that they protect you from the swine flu.
And the flu has such a low fatality rate, why does a vaccine matter in the first place?
Keep in mind that over 2,000 people die each year from taking aspirin. Over 100,000 Americans are killed each year from taking doctor-prescribed, FDA-approved prescription drugs.
If the people at the CDC are looking for a pandemic, they should be focusing on the pandemic of disease mongering and pharmaceutical pushing that's taking place across the world right now in the context of the swine flu pandemic.
There is a real pandemic afoot, though... a pandemic of B.S. running rampant across America and the UK.
It's an infectious form of pharmaceutical quackery that spreads from one person to another at the speed of propaganda. Symptoms of infection include a loss of rational thinking, swine flu hysteria and an irrational belief in symbols of authority.
What we really need in America is a vaccine that protects consumers' brains from infectious pharmaceutical quackery.
Then again, if we actually injected people with that, the whole drug industry would collapse overnight. That's because Big Pharma runs on propaganda.
And the propaganda we're seeing with this swine flu vaccine push is so thick with unjustifiable speculation that it probably deserves a Nobel Peace Prize or something.
_________________________________
About the author: Mike Adams is a natural health researcher and author with a passion for teaching people how to improve their health.
He is a prolific writer and has published thousands of articles, interviews, reports and consumer guides, impacting the lives of millions of readers around the world who are experiencing phenomenal health benefits from reading his articles.
Adams is an honest, independent journalist and accepts no money or commissions on the third-party products he writes about or the companies he promotes.
Known as the 'Health Ranger,' Adams' personal health statistics and mission statements are located at http://www.healthranger.org/
http://click.icptrack.com/icp/relay.php?r=1026724800&msgid=1856860&act=V6JV&c=408625&admin=0&destination=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthranger.org%2F
Are vaccines safe?
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15669
Woman disabled by flu shot
http://www.myfoxdc.com/dpp/health/101309_woman_disabled_by_flu_shot_reaction_dystonia
Nurses sue over vaccination mandate
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15674
The last few posts have given information overload on the truth about the vaccines and the agenda behind them but wanted to keep the new information up to date as find it.
It seems that Americans are finally waking up to the fact that something is wrong...finally!
Here are a few links that you may find of interest:
Flu vaccines revealed as the greatest quackery ever pushed in the history of medicine
(NaturalNews) Prepare to have your world rocked. What you're about to read here will leave you astonished, inspired and outraged all at the same time. You're about to be treated to some little-known information demonstrating why seasonal flu vaccines...
Tragic side effects: marathon runner suffers side effects from vaccine in August-Irreversible!
http://thepeopleschemist.com/blog/
Squalene related not only to Gulf war syndrome...
(email from a friend)
"It IS in the swine flu vaccine in Canada, Europe and Australia. It's supposedly not in U.S. vaccine -- yet -- but will be eventually I bet.
Squalene (an adjuvant) may or may not have been the only culprit associated with Gulf War Syndrome ... but our men & women were forced to take experimental vaccines (they had no choice) and now many, many Gulf War vets have medical issues like sleep disorders, seizures, depression, ALS, MS, etc.
It took over a decade for Govt to admit it exists but GWS funding has been yanked significantly yet tens of thousands (or more) of Gulf war vets continue to suffer and deteriorate.
And yes, I'm aware Govt and Big Pharma claim flu vaccine is safe due to "clinical trials" ... but it's the LONG term damage I fear. Many debilitating symptoms didn't hit vets until years later ... so please think about and discuss this option with your family members and physicians. Or contact a local Naturopath for alternative solutions to boost your immune systems (e.g. Vit D3, fish oil, Vit C, good multiple, quercetin, NAC, turmeric, etc.)
Obviously this is a very personal (and difficult) choice -- many flu symptoms are mild (mine lasted less than 20 hours and my husband's lasted 2-3 days) but others do have trouble with this flu. And yes, I worry about strain mutations but I'm also concerned about billions of people taking a vaccine being rammed down our throats when there are still so many unanswered questions.
The Mercury News ( http://www.mercurynews.com/peninsula/ci_13555627 )
U.S. could potentially use controversial adjuvants in swine flu vaccine
The World Health Organization estimates that a worldwide production capacity of 3 billion doses of pandemic H1N1 vaccines will be used to prevent the outbreak and spread of the 2009 H1N1 flu, or "swine flu," as it is better known. This ambitious plan for widespread vaccine use, albeit inadequate for a total population of 6.8 billion people, has drawn criticism regarding the vaccine's safety, and the use and potential use of vaccine adjuvants.
In the alternative health community, chiropractor Ginger Mills, DC, of Redwood City, is concerned that adjuvants, especially squalene, will be added to vaccines used in the U.S., should the number of cases rise. "Squalene is an oil that is found in olives and in certain other foods, and is perfectly healthy when you ingest it — but when injected into the bloodstream, it can have adverse effects."
Adjuvants enhance or "supercharge" the immune response, reduce the number of vaccines needed, and allow supplies to last longer. Currently, aluminum salts are the only approved vaccine adjuvants for use in the United States. The use of adjuvants has been suspected, but not confirmed, in the development of illnesses in Gulf War veterans who may have received squalene-containing anthrax vaccines.
However, the current stock of U.S. swine flu vaccines does not contain adjuvants, according to Anne Schuchat, MD, in an informational video produced by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Schuchat does acknowledge that there is an emergency provision to use adjuvants — should the pandemic accelerate.
Adjuvants are being used in swine flu vaccines in countries outside of the United States, including Canada, Europe and Australia. However, even though Canada is using an adjuvanted vaccine, it has also ordered 1.8 million doses of the unadjuvanted vaccine for use in pregnant women and children under the age of 3.
...
Maine physician Meryl Nass, MD, has written widely on the use of vaccines. "If novel adjuvants do get added (in the U.S.) — only if conditions change — it would preclude the quick licensure process that took place for the licensed H1N1 vaccines. Recipients would need to sign an informed consent for an experimental product," said Nass. "I do not believe they would be 'secretly' added."( yeah right!)
With a pivotal and profitable role played by the pharmaceutical industry in vaccine production, Nass suggests that there is a lack of "unconflicted data" available about adjuvants. "Nearly all of the MF59 (adjuvant) data were derived from the manufacturer of MF59, for example," said Nass. "It is more the lack of reliable data, and gives the impression that something is being hidden.
Those of us who are familiar with the subject are concerned that if these adjuvants were used en masse, we would face some bad outcomes. The FDA has been sitting on them for 10 years, and usually, that means that the FDA is aware of significant problems."
Swine flu vaccine support crumbles as flimsy rationale for H1N1 shots becomes apparent.
Monday, October 12, 2009 by: Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor
(NaturalNews)--
Public support for the swine flu vaccine is evaporating by the day as the rationale for the vaccine appears increasingly ludicrous to anyone paying attention.
Moms, nurses, day care workers and members of the general public are increasingly realizing that Big Pharma's rationale for swine flu vaccination just doesn't add up.
Recent polls conducted by the mainstream media indicate that more than fifty percent of moms are refusing to expose their children to the swine flu vaccine, and nurses and health practitioners across the US and UK are going vocal with their opposition to the vaccine.
Legal action against the FDA's approval of the swine flu vaccine is already underway and public protests are gaining momentum in raising awareness about the primary objections to the swine flu vaccine. Intelligent, informed people everywhere are saying NO to this vaccine!
Popular support for the vaccine is crumbling by the day, and health authorities are now turning to exaggerated scare stories to try to drum up demand for their vaccines. Where scientific credibility is lacking, fear is being invoked in its place.
Why the swine flu vaccine doesn't add up.
So why is the justification for the swine flu so flimsy?
It all comes down to these five crucial reasons being pushed by the vaccine industry... but as you'll see below, each of these five reasons is demonstrably false! ( Remember the reasons listed are false not truths!)
Reason #1) The H1N1 swine flu pandemic is dangerous and deadly!
Why it's flimsy: While the infection rate of H1N1 is currently high, the fatality rate is remarkably low. In fact, it's no higher than a normal, seasonal flu.
Reason #2) The vaccine protects you from the virus!
Why it's flimsy: There is absolutely no scientific evidence demonstrating that the swine flu vaccine offers real-world protection against the circulating H1N1 virus.
While there is evidence showing that it produces antibodies, as people who have studied vaccine effectiveness already know, the mere existence of vaccine-induced antibodies doesn't directly translate into functional, real-world immunity! Vaccines are often, in effect, fabricated immunity that often don't provide practical immune defense in the real world.
Reason #3) The vaccine is perfectly safe, even for kids!
Why it's flimsy: This reason is truly laughable. None of these vaccines have been properly safety tested by the FDA or the drug companies.
They were approved by the FDA with a waiver, utterly bypassing the normal process of long-term safety testing that the public expects the FDA to enforce.
In fact, according to attorney Jim Turner, the FDA's baseless approval of these swine flu vaccines is a violation of federal law.
http://www.naturalnews.com/027205_vaccines_swine_flu_the_FDA.html
(See lawsuit filed)
Reason #4) There's nothing else you can do to protect yourself from the swine flu (therefore you must take the vaccine shot).
Why it's flimsy: This reason is an outright lie.
In order to sell more vaccines, the pharmaceutical industry (and all its bureaucratic cohorts at the CDC and WHO) are intentionally keeping people ignorant of far safer and more effective options such as vitamin D and anti-viral herbal remedies.
Reason #5) If you don't take the vaccine shot, you're being unethical by placing the shot burden on everyone else without taking it yourself.
Why it's flimsy: Hilarious! This is marketing by guilt -- trying to arm-twist people into the vaccine shot by making them feel guilty if they don't.
The truth is that you're being unethical if you DO get the shot because you're financially supporting a dangerous and highly deceptive vaccine industry that's causing tremendous harm to children, expectant mothers and other innocent vaccination victims.
Hoping to improve your health by handing money to the pharmaceutical industry through the purchase of vaccines is sort of like hoping to create world peace by writing a check to weapons manufacturers.
No good reason to get the vaccine
Is there any good reason to get the swine flu vaccine?
Not based on the current situation, no. Unless you have a strong desire to play Russian Roulette with your health, of course.
Of course, if things dramatically change, there could be increasingly strong reasons for considering a vaccine.
If the H1N1 virus mutates into a virus with a very high fatality rate, things might be different.
If the vaccine were proven safe with adequate long-term testing, that would be something working in its favor.
If the vaccines were scientifically shown to actually protect you from the virus, then that would be different, too.
But to date, none of these things are verifiably true!
The vaccines haven't been properly tested at all.
There's no honest evidence demonstrating that they protect you from the swine flu.
And the flu has such a low fatality rate, why does a vaccine matter in the first place?
Keep in mind that over 2,000 people die each year from taking aspirin. Over 100,000 Americans are killed each year from taking doctor-prescribed, FDA-approved prescription drugs.
If the people at the CDC are looking for a pandemic, they should be focusing on the pandemic of disease mongering and pharmaceutical pushing that's taking place across the world right now in the context of the swine flu pandemic.
There is a real pandemic afoot, though... a pandemic of B.S. running rampant across America and the UK.
It's an infectious form of pharmaceutical quackery that spreads from one person to another at the speed of propaganda. Symptoms of infection include a loss of rational thinking, swine flu hysteria and an irrational belief in symbols of authority.
What we really need in America is a vaccine that protects consumers' brains from infectious pharmaceutical quackery.
Then again, if we actually injected people with that, the whole drug industry would collapse overnight. That's because Big Pharma runs on propaganda.
And the propaganda we're seeing with this swine flu vaccine push is so thick with unjustifiable speculation that it probably deserves a Nobel Peace Prize or something.
_________________________________
About the author: Mike Adams is a natural health researcher and author with a passion for teaching people how to improve their health.
He is a prolific writer and has published thousands of articles, interviews, reports and consumer guides, impacting the lives of millions of readers around the world who are experiencing phenomenal health benefits from reading his articles.
Adams is an honest, independent journalist and accepts no money or commissions on the third-party products he writes about or the companies he promotes.
Known as the 'Health Ranger,' Adams' personal health statistics and mission statements are located at http://www.healthranger.org/
http://click.icptrack.com/icp/relay.php?r=1026724800&msgid=1856860&act=V6JV&c=408625&admin=0&destination=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthranger.org%2F
Are vaccines safe?
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15669
Woman disabled by flu shot
http://www.myfoxdc.com/dpp/health/101309_woman_disabled_by_flu_shot_reaction_dystonia
Nurses sue over vaccination mandate
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15674
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)