Political hypocrisy!

No wonder people say they hate politics but do they? or do they like it because people today, rather than loving eachother, enjoy rather, to piss eachother off and instead of loving and helping our neighbor, its instead, about screwing them before they can screw you! Is this the really America today? It's the way I see it!

I read a quote once, "As is church so is the nation" would it be fair to say "As is is government so is the nation?" Look at us, look at our nation!!!

Are we harmonious or are we on the brink of chaos and civil unrest leading to martial law? This isn't rocket science people, come on!

We have a government that is doing the exact opposite of its intended creation, we have a people that acts contrary to its creation destroying a country contrary to its creation believing in a multitude of religions contrary to its creation and we think the economy is the problem? Seriously?

We have class warfare, and bicker about everything, we have a two party system that seems to promote the chaos as each side jockeys for control where in either case where the people will suffer  tremendously!

Sadly,we are all used to the Democrat Socialist Marxist propaganda so it is not necessary to go into details, although I could, but what is interesting to see from the inside is the actions and statements of the Republican party which confirms to me, if this path continues is the fulfillment of the Communist Manifesto in the indifference in political parties!

GOP statement below:

Romney Confidently Shows America the Right Direction for This Country

Boise, Idaho: At the conclusion of last night’s first Presidential Debate for 2012, Governor Romney showed the poise and character that Republicans have been waiting for in their Presidential Candidate.  At every turn and issue in the debate, President Obama’s demeanor seemed beat by the confident change expressed by Governor Romney. 

Throughout the debate, Governor Romney articulated the value of focusing on creating jobs and bringing strong sustainable growth back to our economy.  “Romney won the debate on taxes and the economy. Cutting federal spending and growing our economy is the right path to solving the debt crisis.” Peterson said.  The Governor made it clear that fixing the ‘moral issue’ of a $1 Trillion annual deficit, which will burden our children, is not possible through Obama’s plan. The President’s approach will raise taxes, which stalls the economy and hurts small businesses and families.  

Romney’s pro-growth, pro-jobs, and pro-reform plan was not the only success last night.  Romney was also assertive and fluent on healthcare.  The Governor assured the aging population that his plan would not affect them and would offer Republican-valued competition into the market to promote lowering the cost of health care.

The most striking point of the debate, according to Chairman Barry Peterson, was how Governor Romney came across as patriotic to the divinely expressed character of our nation’s founding fathers.  He was respectful of the deity articulated in the concepts put together in this great republic.

“Governor Romney’s patriotism was spontaneous and deeply from within himself during last night’s debate,” Chairman Peterson proclaimed.  “When you add that to his record of success in management, like that of the Salt Lake City Olympic Games, and business achievements we can be confident in his ability to lead this great nation in the right direction.”     

Today , the above statement was made by the Republicans in overwhelming support of Romney, an alleged family man, that supports traditional family and American values. Really?

If Romney is a American family values kinda guy, tell me why he is a CFR elite Globalist one world government member, tell me why he supports the NDAA Bill, why his state was one of the premier states to advance the sodomite agenda, why he supports the Patriot Act, Obamacare as Massachusetts seemed to lay the foundation and establishement of it in his own state and why he has invested in Stericycle that supports the killing of the unborn recyclinig baby parts for profit? What else ids there, Bain Capital, allegedly supported by and recipient of the banker bailout, and Im sure there is more...

Problem is, he speaks well, is confident, can speak without a teleprompter, wont quote the Quoran, he is an exceptional businessman and economically and mathematically savvy and in those areas I, myself, believe he is better than Obama but what is crucial to understand is that a new president doesn't change the direction of this country, it only changes the speed at which it implodes.

Is it possible to get a president that actually means what he says and would actually put the Constitution and limitations of government in support of his people instead of the fulfillment of a global agenda that the elite profits from at the expense of the American People?

The way I see it, if Romney is in support of the above listed issues, one can only deduce the following:

He is anti- family in that he supports murder of the unborn
He is anti- traditional marriage because he supports the sodomites.
He is anti-American in that he supports force and coercion on the people by forcing healthcare, indefinite detainment and as a CFR elite supports entities like the United Nations and Agenda 21 that will enslave the people!

Since when shall we be forced to choose between evil and evil? Is that all the choices we have today? As a matter of fact, no! Is not evil, still evil? and if you still vote for evil, will you not still get what you asked for? And you wonder why we, in this country, continue to have problems?

For more on Mitt Romney visit: www.massresitance.com or www.infowars.com and in the seach bar at the upper right, type in Mitt Romney

Fellow uninformed alleged patriots will  argue, "Well a vote for a third party is a vote for Obama! and if you vote third party you are not American because Romney will lose!..."

My reply is " As an alleged Christian nation, Is it more American to vote for evil or against it and as long as we vote for evil will we not continue to get what we deserve and what would God say about that? would he bless a country that would support evil?"

...there is usually silence!
OOPS!

What is most crucial, I believe is to understand the purpose of the political cherade is to create chaos and to keep us occupied while an underlying agenda is being fulfilled. I was told by a wise man, It is wiser to look the opposite hand than the one that is distracting you!

What are your priorities?

What are your priorities?

By Tom Munds

Do you know more about football than your form of government? Do you know the penalty for a personal foul but have no idea when you or your child’s rights have been violated? Is it that football is much more fun? Or you feel like you wouldn’t have anything to offer, or don’t care, maybe you are well aware of current events and use football to take a break from the doom and gloom that you either feel or hear on the news?, maybe as a man you feel a testosterone rush as you re-live your adolescence living vicariously as a warrior on the football field cheering for your child or favorite football team?

What if I told you, the creation of football as a national rage was created on purpose as one of many diversionary tactics to keep you focused on things that don’t matter while an agenda was being fulfilled, to destroy the freedoms you hold so dear, would you believe me? probably not, years ago, I wouldn’t have believed it either but after studying history and the multitude of problems we face today, it is clear our subversion of government has taken place while we were either trusting our local elected officials, media, our federal government or all of the above, while we were attempting to provide for our families. There are some in office that do care but if they lack the proper knowledge of the limitations of government, they become as much of an enemy to freedom than one that  enters office to purposely take control they had no authority to take, after all “the road to hell is paved with good intentions”, right?

Did you know that Hitler used the Olympics as a meeting place for his elite, to successfully plan his agenda? With the Olympics still fresh in the minds of many, can you recollect the frenzy as the millions flocked to their televisions to see what records would be broken? Did you find yourself a bit obsessed for a few weeks, I did. It is easy to understand the plausibility.

Were Hitler’s meetings unique to him alone? No, tyrant dictators often used diversionary tactics to either take the minds of the people off of things that would ordinarily concern them and/or force their people to submit in fear giving up every freedom they had in complete submission. These tactics are textbook and due to our own ignorance of history, we fall for them every time. A simple Google search will reveal such facts about such tactics.

Think about what diversions have occurred in our history. Race, Religion, wars, catastrophes, and genocides class warfare, rich vs. poor, republican vs. Democrat, Obama vs. Romney and Romney against Ron Paul, environment, TSA, energy, economy, public school vs., charter or private school, traditional or same sex marriage and believe it or not, sports!

Ask anyone what the biggest problem is, they will tell you “jobs” almost like they have heard it so many times, it’s programmed in some kind of attempt to divert your attention from a much more serious problem.

One example of many are “jobs.” In your mind are “jobs” the biggest problem? When you think “jobs” are you speaking personally or for the masses of unemployed? If you and your friends had jobs would the problem no longer exist? NO. Among other things, You have been diverted to believe that jobs are the problem, when in fact, the problem is much deeper than that. You have been told “Jobs” are the problem, so that you can learn to be more dependent on government, and if believed, allows the government to reach outside of its limitations to control you and your income and eventually everything else.

There are many instances of clever governmental diversionary tactics that are used on the unsuspecting person and if believed will crush the freedom of not only your generation but all future generations following yours. Are you willing to subject your children to a future without the freedom you enjoyed?

This article isn’t about whether I like or dislike football or if condemn those that play or attend games, I love the camaraderie and watching our children play, this is about knowing what is happening to your future while you are busy doing what you love and hopefully understanding that the reason I write, challenge and speak is not to appear like a nutcase, but that I love my community enough to truly attempt to protect what I believe they are losing without their knowledge.

I write these articles, not even actively campaigning in an attempt  to educate, to open dialogue, to be challenged, debated and to try to help others see what they perhaps don’t see or to say to those that understand, I am here, I am ready to listen to your concerns and fight for what is rightfully yours. If you are mad as hell, you have a right to be, if you aren’t, perhaps you’re not paying attention or need help understanding just what is happening while you are busy.

I ran for office several times to represent you, because I believe you and your children deserve your freedom to be protected. I don’t say this as an empty minded agenda driven politician would do but, in fact, live it, speak it, dream it and act upon it.

So, whether you are an entrepreneur, professional  teacher, soccer mom or a student in school, If you are concerned about issues related to your school board/district, your city council, your county commissioners, your court or law enforcement, or any other rights violation issue, I want to hear from you., even if you aren’t sure but feel something just isn’t right.

In the meantime, Consider going to a city council, school board, highway, irrigation district or county commissioners meeting, or ask your neighbor, child, husband, wife, student, teacher or girlfriend every day how their day went, about the interactions with law enforcement, other teachers, coaches or admin, share information on meetings, was there anything they had a hard time with, new rules or policies? Just begin, in some way, get involved because every day you don’t is another freedom  fought and died for, lost and in vain.

And finally, consider this: Are you willing to allow ANY government entity to make ANY policies that restrict the rights of you and your child in the name of safety or fear? And if so, where then are its limitations from complete control over your life? The ONLY answer is Your Constitution!

What are your priorities? What do pledge allegiance to? Would you cheerfully adorn your car with as many American flags, stickers and magnets as those in celebration of Boise’s Blue and orange?

It’s time that we begin to pay attention again, for as parents we were entrusted to preserve the freedom for our children. DO you care as much for your child’s freedom as you do for their education?

What are your priorities?

You have to choose which hill to die on, in Middleton?

You have to choose which hill to die on!?

 

Why is it every football season I have an elevated heart rate and the fear of arrest just for attending my son’s football games?

 

When I was clueless about law and the destruction of my rights, just an ignorant sheep, like so many oblivious to the concept, It never bothered me to continue to give money to a government entity, obeying arbitrary laws and signs because I was conditioned and believed government was instituted for our benefit, life was simple and I do believe I was happier then, ignorance is bliss, remember?

 

Something happened about four years ago and I’m still not sure if it was a blessing or a curse because now that I know the way things should be, I find myself fighting against the world that doesn’t even realize that it operates unlawfully while I attempt to adhere to it the written law as it was intended and actually and ironically criminalized for it! What a dilemma!

 

The issues I have been fighting vary in severity but nonetheless are incremental restrictions on the rights of the people at the most basic level and they don’t even realize it, in this they label me ridiculous, frivolous or just told I was wasting my time and effort, stating I needed to choose my battles and what hill I am going to die on? Since when has challenging today’s legal system become a “Hill to die on?”

 

Have we really been conditioned to believe that our rights are whatever ANY government says they are? If this is true, what does our history and written rule of law have to say about this? Was not government created BY the people and for the people to protect their rights? Was not congress and the legislature given the limited power to write law? Why today does EVERY government entity have the power to make laws and why do they write laws that restrict the rights of the people when it is so diametrically opposed to its creation, making our government, in fact, unlawful while they blame us, while we adhere to the law as the criminal?

 

So, as I see it, people, the inherent power, create government to protect their rights, limits government by specific and enumerated written limitations as not to usurp the rights of the people but instead today, the government that the people created has taken that power without authority, to restrict the rights of the people at an ever increasing expense?

Think about this!

 

 If you or I were to adhere to a written law and we stepped outside of the law, we would be unlawful and punished but somehow a government that swore and oath to us, to limit it, to function in “good behavior” and acknowledging its limitations when it acts outside of its limitation is not acting unlawful? Why?

 

Take a minor issue for example, speeding tickets. If you tell someone you were going to challenge a speeding ticket, your credibility would be reduced to about zero, trust me, I know. You would be considered a trouble maker and divisive, Really?

 

The next typical response from the one you spoke to is to go to the extreme to make their point, the typical “So you just think everyone should just go 90 mph?” (Why they all choose 90, I’m not sure). Why did they go to such extreme? Is it a defensive mechanism and an effort to prevent them from exposing their ignorance of the law or an attempt to show mine? Who is right, one’s opinion or written law?

 

Is going to such an extreme plausible, sure it is, but they missed the point. Just because I stated I was fighting a speeding ticket they assumed that I am an anarchist that thinks that there shouldn’t be any restrictions which is again, a poor and inaccurate presumption.

 

What if there were laws on the books that proved that what I was fighting was legitimate and that I had enough evidence to prove my innocence, with the written law? It would get thrown out do to popular opinion, otherwise known as a democracy, or mob rule, in a full abandonment of the written law adhering to the rule of opinions instead. Is that what we pledge to, is that what our officers take an oath to, is that what our Founding fathers died for, our military men, to abandon the original intent of our written rule of law and allow opinions to trump the freedom protected to the minority, HARDLY!

 

Take seatbelts as another example, I despise the law that forcefully tells the people what to do in their car and quite frankly they have no jurisdiction or authority to enforce such laws but some of intent of these laws are not bad laws at all, which is still not the issue. The question is or should be at every instance, is it lawful? The answer is no. Why? Because government is to protect the RIGHTS of the people, peace officers were created to “Keep the Peace” and to be available when summoned, not to create revenue for the state and stop people for frivolous infractions, when in reality no crime had been committed due to lack of evidence of the crime or infraction has been committed because no contract had been violated, not to mention that speed limits according to our own laws state that they only apply to commercial vehicles!

 

This topic can from here can go a variety of different ways to make my point and is more complex than I intend on going in this post, but the point is that even though imposed “laws” may sound like good laws, they in reality are not laws at all and in many cases either against the Supreme law of the land, the US constitution and even in our own statutes and supported and defended by supreme court cases!

 

Are you freer than you were 50 years ago? 20 years? 5 Years ago? NO?

Why? Wasn’t government created to protect the rights of the people? If you fail to protect and maintain your home or your children what happens, in your home, things begin to break down, severe disrepair, and eventually destruction, your children, they get sick, get hurt, or run away or  die.

 

The essence of every human is personal property, his life, his breathe, his kids, his animals, his home, cars and  collections, his society and form of government and maintenance of all personal property is crucial to its survival so that it may be passed down.

 

Am I to be condemned for my desire to maintain my personal property and pass it of as a legacy for future generations or shall one be more to be condemned for their failure to do so?

Who is the real criminal, the one that adheres to the written law or the one that adheres to random arbitrary opinions? If you choose wrong, the maintenance of your child’s future is at stake! Shall I be arrested for carrying a water thermos or outside food and drink to a school event or for video recording my sons football game from the sidelines both which do not breach the peace? Really? If this is so, where does it stop? Without limitations on your government, they can never be stopped!

 

It has been stated that I am an “Alarmist” that I treat every issue, no matter how small the same and that in this I also lose credibility. (seems I may not have any left by now). I guess the only thing that I could say is this…

 

“I am aware that many object to the severity of my language; but is there not a cause for severity? I will be as harsh as truth, and as uncompromising as justice. On this subject, I do not wish to think, or to speak, or write with moderation. NO! NO! Tell a man who’s house is on fire to give a moderate alarm; tell him to moderately rescue his wife from the hands of a ravisher; tell the mother to gradually extricate her babe from a fire into which it has fallen;- but urge me not to use moderation in a case like the present. I am in earnest-I will no equivocate- I will not excuse- I will not retreat a single inch- and I will be heard. The apathy of the people is enough to make every statue leap from its pedestal, and to hasten the resurrection from the dead”

 

William Lloyd Garrison “To the public” from the Inaugural  editorial 1 January 1831 The Liberator

 

 

What's up with DHS?

8 28 2012
Called Local Department of Homeland Security office:

Idaho Bureau of Homeland Security (208) 422-3040
Public Information Officer-Robert Feeley (208) 422-3033
Agency Contacts
County Emergency Coordinators
IDEOC Organizational Chart
Address and Fax:
4040 Guard St., Bldg. 600
Boise, ID 83705-5004
Fax: (208) 422-3044
Idaho Drug Tip Hotline
Phone: 1 (800) 524-7277
To Report Suspicious Activity
Web at: www.isp.idaho.gov/icici/
BG Bill Shawver
Director
Bureau of Homeland Security
4040 West Guard Street, Bldg 600
Boise, Idaho 83705-5004
208-422-3040
www.bhs.idaho.gov
Whats up with the DHS?
I called Idaho bureau of Homeland Security on 8 28 2012 at approx. 2:30pm,

Idaho Criminal Intelligence Center
Direct Law Enforcement Line
Phone: (208) 846-7676
Email: icic@fusion.idaho.gov

I spoke to the woman that answered the phone from the Direct Law enforcement line( above) to ask her if the office was federal, state or city and how they defined a “crime.” She said that she works with all levels of government and law enforcement and crimes are like drugs.( Really?)

She asked if she could help answer any questions about crime and law enforcement so I told her I was aware of Janet Napolitano and her relentless pursuit to have us tell on each other when we see a crime being committed was a bit overboard and asked her if she thought that was a bit excessive to which she was silent.

I asked her “so is this bureau federal?” She said it was all of the above, She said they have members of all agencies there. I said Uh, I don’t think it is lawful to co-opt, comingle and amalgamate levels of government because it destroys the checks and the balances of government in the ability for the government to usurp the will and law of the people, she was silent.

I asked her, so where do you derive your power and authority, she was silent.
I asked her did you take an oath, she said “NO”
I said that you must not be an “officer”, she said “Yes”
I said than you must be a private agency, she said “No”
I asked if she had signed the Standard F85 form, she said “No”

I said so where does the authority come from for you to not only co-mingle agencies but not have any accountability to the people you say, without oath, to protect?

I asked her where the guarantee is that the rights of the people will not be destroyed, she was silent…
She asked me,( frustrated and reluctantly)  “Ugh, Can I help you sir about a crime?

I said: “Yes, as a matter of fact you can, but before doing so, I would like you or someone there to define a crime so that we may be on the same page, because as I see it, If I got away with what our Federal government is doing, I would be considered a criminal. Is a terrorist or a criminal one that subverts our present form of government or one that upholds it?

I said, “how can I be a criminal when I support and defend the present written rule of law, And why are you not if you don’t?” I went on…

“On the other hand, We the people created government to protect our rights and instead, they poison our vaccinations, genetically modify our food, poison our air, tell us what we can and cannot do, through regulations on energy, air, water, heavy graduated tax, private land, public land, trumps state and local laws, control schools and not only  impose blatant violations of the constitution but specifically completely avoid the present rule of law limiting government while  increasingly restrict every right we have WITHOUT AUTHORITY.”

I asked “if I obey the law and you allow TSA, for example, to violate our right to privacy, WITHOUT A CONGRESSIONAL MANDATE, where does this authority come from? YOU DON”T HAVE ANY JURISDICTION DO YOU?”

If congress makes all laws then without a congressional mandate, it is not law!!
She said, well, you need to call your local representatives…

I said about what? According to your FEDeral government, they have the supreme authority to run roughshod over anyone and anything?

I said and furthermore, we are waking up to who you are and what you do and I will do anything and everything to make sure people know about it.”

I asked “Are you a fusion center?” She said yes, I asked “what is that for, because it sure isn’t to protect the rights of the people, but, in reality, to take tax payer dollars without their authority for their own enslavement…””
She hung up.

Canyon County wantss to hire an attorney to HELP us defend ourselves? LOL!

Letter to the editor-Idaho Press Tribune 8/13/2012

In response to the article August 10, 2012 located here:

http://www.idahopress.com/news/state/idaho-county-to-hire-lawyer-to-help-pro-se-cases/article_78dd7051-6458-5fea-a914-dce7551e87f2.html

If there were a time in America to be indignant, its now but people have no idea what is happening –the August 10^th’s article is one clarion call to the detriment to our freedom!

The county spending more tax dollars “in this economy” to help us to defend ourselves in court?

None of this would be an issue if the government understood its proper role and quit criminalizing its citizens as fines cush the judges retirement fund and increase revenue for increased criminalization tactics or they didn’t violate the constitution allowing to choose our own defense, a common law right.

If they allowed people to understand that judges, prosecutors and attorneys are members of the same union or if the people knew that magistrates had no power to rule, that officers aren’t officers but instead employees and that attorneys are unconstitutional.

If they would not have retracted trial by jury in all cases, show proof of a damaged party or to give itself immunity against the taxpayer, or if the people realized that our constitutional republic has been hijacked by a CORPORATE government, where we are no longer the inherent power but mere subservient employees.

If the people knew without our constitution limiting government, the need to establish jurisdiction, standing and true nature and cause of a crime, that this is all a statutory scheme, they would be outraged!

If the government would do its job protecting the innocent and punishing evil and honor its oath of limitations of power it would be a help and cost benefit! The fact that the people have created government to protect their rights and limit government’s powers through a written constitution and they have failed, the people will be forced to make them obey, like they make us obey oppressive rules of tyranny!

The reason they want to hire an attorney is to insure that no one operates outside of the CORPORATE Vail! It's all a sham, in Corporate government,they are the kings and were the pawns rather than the other way around

WAKE UP PEOPLE, YOU ARE NO LONGER FREE!

Regarding Middleton schools drug authorization form

Who has authority, the school or the parents?

By Tom Munds

Are you increasingly concerned with the amount of government regulations imposed on us as parents as well as the state and Federal regulations on your child that render your authority powerless and only in accordance with what the government says?

This once land of the free and home of the brave has become a government controlled nanny state that once was created to protect your rights now has taken the authority from you to tell you what your rights are and that of your child and to protect us from ourselves, a power they were never given!

How is it that every government entity today has taken your power and authority from you, to tell you what you can and cannot do, and yet people are still silent? If we truly love our children like we say we do, why are we so concerned about their education ( THATS A DIFFERENT SUBJECT ALTOGETHER) but not about their rights? Are we that short sighted?

If you have not registered for school or sports yet, you will find an abundance of documentation that you will be REQUIRED to sign in order to participate, drug authorization forms, vaccination forms, conduct and dress code forms, in addition to a multitude of mandatory fees that you already paid for with your tax dollars like parking passes, access to games and lockers etc. You are not only subjecting yourselves to rules and regulations of the school but by associated organizations like, but not limited to, the YEA and the IHSAA which also have no authority.

The problem is because no one has been watching out for the people, these entities are playing on the ignorance of the people coercively forcing them to submit to a jurisdiction they do not possess, simply, they do not have the power, authority or the right to force signatures of any contract on anyone accept those that are employees of the school district nor do they have the authority to tax you twice with these mandatory fees!

The solution to this problem is to begin to pay attention to what is happening and when you feel something is wrong, challenge it, in the American system where the people have the “inherent power” and the government are “servants” of the people, the only way we preserve the freedom for our children is to pay attention, to remain vigilant , stand when needed and elect people that understand the preservation of the principles of freedom and will fight for them which is why I may run for school board if I have the support.

I am not an attorney but I do passionately understand when rights violations occur and will stand every moment I get to preserve the rights of the parents, the teachers and the children. Our beloved children have the same right to freedom we all had and it should be our top priority to guarantee that freedom.

I will be asking them to sign it, they, of course, will object but I will ask that they write that they receive it. If you have concerns about your school disctrist your your government, feel free to contact me here or my cell number at 208-861-6405 or email me at tom@tommunds.com

Exhibit A (Addendum)

Middleton School District # 134

5 South 3^rd Ave West

Middleton, ID 83644

Drug testing

General Rights Acknowledgement form

I, the undersigned, understand that performance as a student/staff member of the Middleton School District is dependent, in part, on conduct and personal responsibility as a private person. I hereby agree to accept and abide by policies, standards, rules and regulations set forth by Middleton School District #134 for the activity or activities in which I participate as long as they are not repugnant to the protections granted to the people by the U. S. Constitution and hereby acknowledge that schools carry with them only the authority to discipline its corporate employees and not to restrict the rights of any child or parent.

Notwithstanding, I also understand that if the policies and procedures, fell under “equal justice under the law” if imposed, they shall apply not only to parents and student but to faculty as well to ensure that parents retain the disciplinary power, control and protection over their child and that the authority of the parent supersedes any law that prevents it, with the understanding that under Article XI, section 2, of the Constitution for the united states that “The United states constitution is the supreme law of the land” and in accordance with Marbury v. Madison (1802)“any law repugnant to it is null and void.”

In the event that “probable cause” has been warranted, I understand that Middleton School District , as it pertains to employees , has the authority to take disciplinary action but as it pertains to the students/parents has only the authority to call the parents of students unless a crime has been committed which will extend authority to local law enforcement. I, the undersigned, sign with the understanding that no school district has the power or the authority that extends beyond this limitation. As Middleton School District has the disciplinary power over its employees and not to its students , if “probable cause” has been verified regarding a student it is the authority of the parent to deal with the issue at hand that if left unattended will also extend to the authority of local law enforcement. If “probable cause” has been verified regarding a district employee, the district has only the authority to discipline that employee or refer the action to local law enforcement. Due to the sensitive nature and privacy rules, the school district has no right to privacy information that pertains to the issue at hand unless it pertains to the employees of the school district.

Therefore let it be known that Middleton School District may have the power to make suggestive recommendations but has no obligatory power to conduct the above drug tests even upon “reasonable suspicion” while a child is involved in the particular class/sport as disciplinary issues are left to the parent or law enforcement.

I understand that this signed contract as a parent/ student waives none of my rights at any time and that instead protects my rights against any overreaching authority not expressly given by the parent. As an employee I understand that this contract acknowledges my limitations of authority and that I may be subject to the disciplinary actions of the District imposed by the parents/board/staff with “probable cause”.

I also understand that due to the voluntary nature of this contract regarding parent/student and that one is “innocent until proven guilty”, that the refusal to give up one’s rights in no way prevents any person from the participation in any event that any school shall sponsor. I do understand as it pertains to district employees this contract is obligatory as a guarantee that the rights of the parent/child will not be violated.

Regarding the signatures below, I understand that the child’s signature is not a requirement or legally binding as the child is under age and that the parent /guardian is signing on their behalf as an acknowledgement of this contract and is therefore not necessary for any reason but to inform the underage signee of the rights and limitations clarified herein.

Prior to participating in ALL extracurricular activities, or registration into the school district, all student/parent/ guardian/staff member are all asked to sign this general acknowledgement form, and that a copy of this form is included in each employee and students personal file. If there should be any discrepancy related to the parents and the district that a mediation meeting will be called to deal with unresolved issues before any action is taken upon the child.

Any attempt by the district or its employees to force the signing of any contract that waives the rights of any private person is considered under duress and coercion, and may be subject to legal action. Any failure to adhere to this contract by any corporate employee will result in disciplinary action by the board and if not satisfied may also be subject to legal action.

Parent/Guardian Name( printed)___________________________________ Date_______________________

Parent/ Guardian signature_________________________________________Date_______________________

Staff/admin/employee signature____________________________________ Date_______________________

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------

Student name/ (Printed) If student, list graduation year

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------

Student/Staff signature Date

Response to Alisson on "letter to Oathtakers"

In a previous post I wrote an open "letter to Oathtakers" and this is the only comment thus far and of course, comes with my response to the comment. I pray he is law enforcement to open dialogue and destroy the wedge between law enforcement and its citizens and to learn the truth of what has happened to our country, our laws, our history and the common sense in this country!

A response to my letter to Oath takers

 Tom,

I just want to say something to the ppeloe who keep saying the government shouldnt regulate responsibility and individuals should be responsible for their own actions . If some guy came into a mall waving a loaded gun around and acting piss drunk, should the police just say “oh well he should have been responsible for himself” and not do anything about it? NO. When you get behind the wheel after drinking, you are gaining control of a LETHAL WEAPON with limited inhibitions and lowered reaction time. The level is set there because that is where the government thinks a person is no longer reasonably able to control their own vehicle, where the reaction time slows on an average person. Like others have said, if you are driving erratically and blow something lower than a .08, you will still be held responsible. If it is set at .00, many ppeloe who are fully functioning could be cited at traffic stops where they test everyone. They put it at a limit so they can catch those who are actually inhibited. And this has nothing to do with prohibition or personal responsibility. If it were up to me, anyone given a DUI would automatically get a suspended license.

To Alisson  Almeida:

Dear Alisson,

Ah, finally a reader that comments and what great questions and concerns you have, thank you! I hope you will take the time to read my responses to them as they are important in how we look at law today and the way they were originally supposed to. You sound like a cop, are you? If you are I am extremely glad you read my letter and had the guts to comment in a public forum, You have my respect!

First, if I see it correctly, you are bothered by my comments. I am sorry for this but maybe I can help clarify my position.

Second, you are not the only one to get frustrated at comments I have made but for the most part in the past it has been either ignorance of the law that causes this or peoples refusal to see what bad shape we are in in this country and their only answer they can come up with is that we need more government to fix the ills of society.

If you love this country, why? If you love this country for the freedom we have, how do you think we have been so free and what has kept us that way?

As a passionate historian and lover of both American History and Constitutional, Biblical and common law, I can tell you that first of all this country was founded as an experiment in SELF-GOVERNMENT, meaning you took personal responsibility for your own actions and were punished for wrong doing, which was the purpose of law not to preemptively save ourselves from each other from our stupidity!

This country was founded my men that broke the chains of tyranny from Great Britain where the King ruled with Feudalism, you were only entitled to the rights he gave you, maybe in trade for something else, The King was the Tyrant ruler, read the Declaration of Independence!

These men sick of being told everything they could and couldn't do, wanted freedom from this tyranny and came to America. When they came here they brought with them great wisdom and ability that I believe was the marvel of the world.

These men were astute and avid readers with great knowledge in history, law both English law and Biblical law and so much more. With this knowledge and what they had left in England, they came up with a variety of documents and declarations that stated their purpose and their mission. In these documents you will find that the purpose and intent and understanding for them was this:

AS A SIDE NOTE, In United  States Code, Title 1, you will find all of the organic laws that are still in place today and will confirm the statements in my post in addition to many founding documents, I will share upon request or you can Google them.

God created man with inalienable Rights (rights that no man or government was authorized to take away)

These men created government to PROTECT THOSE RIGHTS ( not to control or dictate them!)

So far, in this explanation, we have people that left a nation and its tyrant king in search of freedom;

They find this freedom and write declarations to prevent being ruled by another tyrant

They establish a constitutional republic (not a democracy) that's intent was TO LIMIT GOVERNMENT, NOT ITS PEOPLE!

In this republic, it was also an experiment to see how well people could not only govern themselves but to remain vigilant to continue this form of government.

This government was taken from Isaiah 33 that established checks and balances that maximized the scope and control of government thereby maximizing the freedom of the people.

You have probably heard that God and politics should be separated and that is an American tradition, which is the biggest lie the American people have ever been fed because the entire principle of government hinged on the fact that our country recognized Gods law in order to not only remain moral and religious but to maintain our self-government.

I’ll bet with all due respect, you have never read your constitution or Bill of Rights, I didn’t either till I was in my 40’s. Did you know it was the only documentation to maintain your freedom from a tyrant king or dictator and that without your knowledge of this documentation, you only have rights that you know you have or that your government says you have?

I can go on but let's to get to your issues, Am I assume you are being hypothetical? If you are, is it okay to suppose that I should be as well? Do you think that I do not support law enforcement? Do you think that I am stupid enough to think that I would allow a drunk guy walking into a mall waving a gun, if so what gave you that hair brained idea?

With respect to your next issue of driving drunk, they are not related so I will explain the drunken mall guy first.

 The drunk guy waving ( THREATENING)  a gun that bothers you has committed a crime, he is recklessly endangering others that are there, scaring children and all else, this man is not taking personal responsibility and should be punished, Biblically 40 lashes!

Someone that drinks behind the wheel is quite different in that he hasn't committed a crime. This is crucial in understanding the original intent of the law. I’m not saying that people should necessarily be allowed to drive drunk because it negates their personal responsibility but it come back to the fact that NO CRIME HAS BEEN COMMITTED. For a crime to be present, there has to be a witness, biblically, 2, a victim and physical damage that would confirm the crime rather than make it arbitrary and overused as it is now where they can just pull anyone over preemptively to just see if they have, rendering us guilty until proven innocent as is backwards from the intent of our laws that we are innocent before proven guilty.

If I may go hypothetical for a moment, before continuing, since I allowed you to be,...

... what if Governemnts took the power that were inherent in the people and used that power  and the money from the tax payers to control every move they made, through oppressive laws trashing their written law that limits government, to governemnts investing using tax dollars to make millions,  surveillance cameras, heavy taxation, create class warfare, open our borders, ship thriving businesses overseas killing jobs, welcoming the communists here to create jobs, control food and water, recreation, healthcare, change social attitudes, brainwash our citizens to believe that bigger government meant more freedom and that killing innocent babies and sodomy with a same sex partner was a choice  ultimately and collectively leading to create mass genocide?  WHat if the three branches of government  in a country decided on its own to become a dictatorship, to render local rural law enforcement and city councils to the a glabal authority? If they did, would you know or even care if it was subversive to not only the intent of this country but a danger to your freedom, WAKE UP ITS HERE!

Cars are not weapons, they are modes of travel. People say that cars, cell phones, bullets, liquor and all inanimate objects kill people which is ignorant and propagandizemnent of the truth. The fact is, you have been lied to again about the truth and it has conditioned you to believe that is true.

Do guns kill people? NO, people kill people, shall we ban people???

Does texting kill people? NO, people kill People, should we ban people????

Does Alcohol, knives or anything else kill people, NO! People kill people, should we ban people?

If you believe a car IS a "lethal weapon" than you should believe, but would be wrong, that anything that can kill someone IS a weapon, a baseball bat, a sheet, plastic wrap, medications etc. Things that people are killed with are USED AS weapons, not that they are weapons themselves and it a car is a weapon, why aren't they banned along with the desire to ban guns better ye since people kill and not objects, lets just ban people, You see how ridiculous it is?

The purpose and intent of my letter is not so much to be rude or abrasive but  to wake people up, it is to get them agitated, just a bit, to take the time to challenge me and others  on the issues and see where we are as a nation today and to challenge people like you to see if this kind of rotting societal decay and loss of freedom is what you want for your kids?  I’m glad you contacted me and would love to chat more.

Here is where I am and quite frankly where we should be, in my humble opinion:

We need God as ruler and to obey his commandments to remain free, and if not followed suffer harsh punishments because His will and Way is perfect, our founders even believed it!

We the people need to understand that without knowledge of history we repeat our mistakes and we are falling just like Judah, Israel, Egypt, Greece, Rome and others did.

The people need to be aware and remain vigilant on the limitations of government to insure and maximize our freedom and for our children

We need to understand our history and our laws and understand that governments have always ended in the mass genocide of its people if allowed unbridled control, which they have given themselves here in America!

We need to understand where our rights come from and that no man had the power take them away, therefore we need to understand that we were created in the image of God and obey his laws

We need to realize that our failure to acknowledge God not only make our rights subjective to the king or dictator but that these rights will decrease not be maintained enslaving your children.

We need to understand that when governments become oppressive, it is because they feel they are losing control and need to make more and more laws, also enslaving you and your children.

We need to understand that allowing government to encroach on our rights, violating the constitution because it sounds like it could be a good thing, opens the door to arbitrary rule and will them allow for them to step beyond those limitations as long as they can sell you on it, until they have finally gained enough control where they openly admit their intentions as thousands die in massive bloodshed created by every totalitarian regime in history.

Did you government sell you on seatbelts? It’s a great thing but should government tell you what to do in your car? Yes? ok then anything can be made illegal- stereo, food, beverages, rear view mirrors, children etc?

Did your government sell you on speed limits, texting, insurance, noise ordinances, tire sizes, window tint, illegal search ad seizure, environmental regulations and mpg restrictions,surveillance cameras, food, gun carry, children and so on? Sky is the limit, you've opened the flood gates!

Our Founding fathers stated that “the constitution was written for a moral and religious people and wholly inadequate for any other form of government.” If we are neither religious nor moral, how can we expect that our founding documents can possibly maintain our freedom by limiting government when people now feel that they can do whatever they want to? We were a nation of unity not division. It was because of our love and agreement on freedom the fact that the government that governs least governs best!

When you read your constitution, find out where it says that the people authorize government to make laws that restrict their freedom, You won’t find it because it completely contradicts the intent of the document, remember it was written to limit government, not the people because the people were under a completely different jurisdiction, GODS LAW!

As long as we obeyed Gods laws, we remained self-governed, if we chose to vacate our inalienable rights, government could and would rule over its people that will lead to mass genocide, don't trust me, trust history!

 Think about this....

If America was created on the understanding that our rights were inalienable from God and that no man could take them away, don't you think it’s interesting that the supreme court, a branch of government ruled to remove God? Why., TO CONTROL YOU!!! Your Bill of Rights was written to prevent this!

Separation of church and state is not American, it is Marxist, it is Sovietist or totalitarian to make you look to the government for all your rights and condition you to believe there is no God!

I would entertain at any time to speak with anyone, anywhere to speak more on these topics not because I am any big deal, I’m far from it, I am just relentless in my pursuit for freedom and I understand what is happening to us and I not only worry about my family, I'm worried about yours!

In a few weeks, You should come to court as I respectfully attempt to educate the judge on the principles of freedom, both the authority he does have and what he doesn't- somehow they feel they can say and do whatever they want to and we, as wee feeble subjects must obey...Under who's authority and jurisdiction?

I consider myself a law abiding citizen even though I pay unconstitutional taxes,( there are taxes I believe are proper- different topic) but until I can prove they are, at the risk of losing my home, I will submit to a point but I do have extreme disdain for others who fail to take personal responsibility for their actions those whom come here illegally, that a drunk waving guns or use their cars as weapons, it has forced government to at the hands of the minority to restrict the rights of the majority which is still outside their oath of office as I have mentioned before. Those I really have difficulty with and fear are those, like myself just a few short years ago, who put their hand over their heart, pledging allegiance to something of which they have no clue or those that have sworn and oath on one hand and violate that oath without even knowing it or who tell others the way it is without any knowledge of "what is" themselves and no knowledge of our incredible history!

We are all in a different place as we walk through this life and some are farther along in their understanding than others, but it is the ones that know and understand that MUST reach out to those that do not and warn them about what has happened and continues to happen. I can go on about all of it, Abortions, Vaccinations, GMO, detention centers, water and food control, food and water additives etc. Google: "Codex Alimentarious" or check out www.prisonplanet.com or www.infowars.com to get a glimpse of whats happening nationally!

If you think this is about a drunk driver or a drunk gun waver or a speeding ticket, please look at the big picture,this is about your enslavement!!

Government is to protect the rights of the people with specific and enumerated powers. Article 1, Section 8, US Constitution

If you read this far, I appreciate it. Any further comments are always appreciated.

 Thank you,

Tom Munds

208-861-6405