As a Christians most of us are told that "The Jews" are the chosen people.
As Americans we are taught that we are a nation founded on Christian principles.
We are taught that Muslims are a religion of peaceful people.
We are taught that the government is out for our best interest and that they serve their constitutents and some people to this day still believe they do.
What if everything you were taught to believe was a lie, how would you know? As I have mentioned in previous posts about the dangers of "moral relativism" here is one more reason why I feel it is so dangerous.
How is it we changed from a nation of absolute truth and become a culture to believe that facts are irrelevent and what is true is only ones opinion?
Although this intro could take us in 1million directions, I wanted to share with you one scenario in which I have been debating via email with a friend in Kansas city, MO where he focuses on the 9-11 conspiracy trying to educate others on how important it is. It would appear that lately rather than focusing only on 9-11 itself, he has shifted his focus more on the possiblity that the Jews are responsible for the terror attacks rather than the Muslims and that the Muslims are the ones being persecuted.
Although I was in complete disbelief and thought he was nuts at first I thought about it for awhile and realized that this countries elite are what few believe to be the the Khazar Jews. Could these elite have full control behind the scenes? Bernanke, Greenspan, Spielberg etc?
I have spent time in the study of the Muslim culture and Islam through the Koran and the Hadith as well as books written by friends that give a history of Islam and after reading these books, it is my opinion that Islam is truly a religion of oppression and violence, their suras speak for themselves.
Knowing this, I have had extreme difficulty believeing that the Muslims could be the ones being persecuted and blamed on these attacks especially when KSM and others admitted the planning and execution.
I am in a bit of a quandry and now am forced to consider further studies and I will.
We all know the media has a bias, we all know that many things that were once considered conspiracy theory has now become true, at least to those who choose to believe it , is this any different?
Only time will reveal the truth and only when people begin to see things with their own eyes will they consider the multitude of possiblities because no one wants to believe in bad things especially when they could happen to you, will it be too late? Will our consequences be because of our disinterest in what could be happening around us?
I submit some information for your consideration:
Through previous posts I have written my thoughts on Islam I give you today some population percentages of the growth and expance of their culture. Over time we may be able to see what happens in the areas with the growth of the population in different areas. In addition I have included some links that give some consideration to the argument that the Jews were responsible and not the Muslims. I am a bit perplexed myself, how about you?
http://jewishcrimenetworkdid911.blogspot.com/
www.911MISSINGLINKS.com
It was recommended that I view JEWISHCRIMENETWORKDID911, go to that page and See the EVIDENCE involving Rabbi Dov Zakheim, Comptroller of the Pentagon in the period before 9/11 when $2.3 trillion dollars in allocations went missing. Please learn about this one mastermind--and consider all the others it took to pull off this masterful "false flags" operation which Israel is known for.
Here are the facts on Islam throoughout the world:
ISLAM’S WORLDWIDE THREAT: Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult. In its fullest form, it is a complete, total, 100% system of life. Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, social, and military components. The religious component is a facade for all other components.
Islamization begins when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their so-called ‘religious rights.’
When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse societies agree to ‘the reasonable’ Muslim demands for their ‘religious rights,’ they also get the other components under the table.
Here’s how it works. (percentages source CIA: The World Fact Book – 2007).
As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens. In fact, they may be featured in articles and films, stereotyped for their colorful uniqueness:
This is the case in:
United States — Muslim 0.6%
Australia — Muslim 1.5%
Canada — Muslim 1.9%
China — Muslim 1.8%
Italy — Muslim 1.5%
Norway — Muslim 1.8%
At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs. This is happening in:
Denmark — Muslim 2%
Germany — Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%
Spain — Muslim 4%
Thailand — Muslim 4.6%
From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. This is occurring in:
France — Muslim 8%
Philippines — Muslim 5%
Sweden — Muslim 5%
Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad & Tobago — Muslim 5.8%
At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.
When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam, with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections, in:
Guyana — Muslim 10%
India — Muslim 13.4%
Israel — Muslim 16%
Kenya — Muslim 10%
Russia — Muslim 15%
After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues, such as in:
Ethiopia — Muslim 32.8%
At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare, such as in:
Bosnia — Muslim 40%
Chad — Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%
From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels, such as in:
Albania — Muslim 70%
Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%
Qatar — Muslim 77.5%
Sudan — Muslim 70%
After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, such as has been experienced and in some ways is on-going in:
Bangladesh — Muslim 83%
Egypt — Muslim 90%
Gaza — Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%
Iran — Muslim 98%
Iraq — Muslim 97%
Jordan — Muslim 92%
Morocco — Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan — Muslim 97%
Palestine — Muslim 99%
Syria — Muslim 90%
Tajikistan — Muslim 90%
Turkey — Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%
100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ — the Islamic House of Peace. Here there’s supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the Madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word, such as in:
Afghanistan — Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%
Somalia — Muslim 100%
Yemen — Muslim 100%
Unfortunately, peace in never achieved, as in these 100% states the most radical Muslims intimidate and spew hatred, and satisfy their blood lust by killing less radical Muslims, for a variety of reasons.
‘Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; the tribe against the world, and all of us against the infidel.
– Leon Uris, ‘The Haj’
It is important to understand that in some countries, with well under 100% Muslim populations, such as France, the minority Muslim populations live in ghettos, within which they are 100% Muslim, and within which they live by Sharia Law. The national police do not even enter these ghettos.
There are no national courts nor schools nor non-Muslim religious facilities. In such situations, Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. The children attend madrasses. They learn only the Koran. To even associate with an infidel is a crime punishable with death. Therefore, in some areas of certain nations, Muslim Imams and extremists exercise more power than the national average would indicate.
Today’s 1.5 billion Muslims make up 22% of the world’s population. But their birth rates dwarf the birth rates of Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, and Jews, and all other believers. Muslims will exceed 50% of the world’s population by the end of this century.
Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond’s book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat
America, you like the Islam culture? If the information is true regarding the percentages, I suspect there is a large problem on the horizon, in the not to distant future,do you see the possibility?We have been taught to deny our own culture in support of all others we know little about, in the name of tolerance,when others are not tolerant of ours, but why should that be a surprise when we disavowed our own culture we knew little to nothing about.
Maybe this is why the Jews aren't in the media are because it is controlled by them, what do we know about the Jews anyway? Most belive they are Christians, maybe thats why Christians have a bad wrap, who knows. More on the Khazar Jews another time...
Friday, November 20, 2009
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
The Christian character of the Early Colonists
Did you know that religion was the most dominating factor in every civilization and history dictates that the purer the religion, the wiser the civil government?
Did the Early American colonists possess Christian character in the establishment of this nation?
History shows that Christianity was the mightiest political and social influence in the world. When compared to Romanism, for example, the colonists believed that the Protestant faith in which this nation was founded, was the only hope of freedom in the world, rather than the Roman doctrines of the Catholic Church.
Although many will say that the Norsemen discovered this continent in 1000A.D. which is true, they had come and gone and it was forgotten until Columbus had discovered it 400 years later.
Columbus at a young age believed that he was called by God, his name meaning “Christ-bearer” he felt he was to be a messenger of God of “The new heavens and new Earth.”
Contrary to most history books today, Columbus was a man of prayer. Before his first voyage and the discovery of San Salvador, a Holy Communion was celebrated in Palos, Spain. After his discovery a cross was erected as they sung “Gloria in Excelsis”, which means Glory in the highest.
Columbus’ second voyage was accompanied by 12 priests and endorsed with the authority of King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella to give spiritual attention to the natives. Many voyages occurred and all of them included the papal authority to take these countries in the name of the church.
There were many reasons to discover the new world including wealth, greed and enterprise but studies indicate that the chief ambition was to honor God.
Back in Europe this was a great time of tyranny and oppression and the people were becoming increasingly agitated, in addition to, John Huss and the spread of Wyclifs English Bible that were all noted to be the main attributes of the reformation.
John Huss with his leadership was considered the ‘prophet of the nations” and his presence threatened the crown. He considered the Reformation to be “much more than an emancipation of the mind but a political national and international revolution.”
The divine right of Kings was being replaced by Constitutional government. Reformers proclaimed that “there shall be no distinction between spiritual and secular laws among Christians in that they were not to have two consciences, one for the state and one for the church.
The king of Spain said “the conversion of the Indians is the principle foundation if this conquest.”
With the Spanish in the South and the Pacific, The French along St. Lawrence, Mississippi and in Montreal, it wasn’t until the defeat of Montcalm and the fall of Quebec that opened the door to the American republic where personal and civil liberty and individual freedom began to take root.
The Virginia colony was the first English colony established by Protestants in North America and promoted by religion.
The first charter of the Virginia colony was “to provide that the true word and service of God be preached, planted and used not only for the colony but among the savages.”
“The colony under providence of Almighty God might tend to the glory of his Divine majesty in propagating the Christian religion.’
The first building erected was built for worship and the first law was “to aid the colonists in keeping of good conscience.”
In 1619 the church was established by law, yearly salaries were established for clergy that were paid for by all males 16 years and older. In 1624 every plantation had to provide a house or room for public worship.
Plymouth colony was established 13 years after Jamestown and was created to “practice a positive part of church reformation and propagate the gospel in America.”
The Mayflower reaches and anchors off Cape Cod and the colonists create the Mayflower compact organizing a “civil body politic”
It reads, in summation:
“In the name of God Amen. By the grace of God our countries have undertaken for the glory of God and the advancement of the Christian faith. To enact, constitute and frame such just and equal laws, ordinances, acts, constitutions and offices unto which we promise all due submission and obedience.”
(Nov. 11,1620)
Massachusetts bay, John Winthorp, governor “I submit and dedicate myself to God’s will and yours.”
Hartford, Connecticut, settled in 1623, according to Dr. Baird “carried the ark of the Lord with them and made religion the basis of their institutions including civil government that all would be ordered by the rules scriptures held forth.”
Maryland, Lord Baltimore, Roman Catholic, “ No persecution within the province professing the belief in Jesus Christ shall be troubled, molested or discounted for their religion or “ free exercise thereof”
Frederick Maurice stated “Colonies are sect commonwealths connected by religious convictions and persecutions; to their religion they owed their best qualities.”
John Milton, teacher and poet “The Bible doth more clearly teach the solid rules of civil government.”
William Penn “God in Christ has placed a principle in every man and infirm him of his duty and enable him to do it”
Religion led them to abandon their country rather than submit to tyranny and coming to this continent they were hoping for two things:
the enlargement of Christ’s’ kingdom by conversion of the heathen tribes and the founding of an empire for their children in which their religion could prevail.”
The continual study of the American commonwealth is a continual affirmation of Gods divine hand in the creation of this continent. These colonists believed that the Bible was everything from religious principles, the basis for law and government and all matters of common life.
This being further proof that we are a nation founded on religious Christian principles, and confirms the Christian character of the early colonists.
Did the Early American colonists possess Christian character in the establishment of this nation?
History shows that Christianity was the mightiest political and social influence in the world. When compared to Romanism, for example, the colonists believed that the Protestant faith in which this nation was founded, was the only hope of freedom in the world, rather than the Roman doctrines of the Catholic Church.
Although many will say that the Norsemen discovered this continent in 1000A.D. which is true, they had come and gone and it was forgotten until Columbus had discovered it 400 years later.
Columbus at a young age believed that he was called by God, his name meaning “Christ-bearer” he felt he was to be a messenger of God of “The new heavens and new Earth.”
Contrary to most history books today, Columbus was a man of prayer. Before his first voyage and the discovery of San Salvador, a Holy Communion was celebrated in Palos, Spain. After his discovery a cross was erected as they sung “Gloria in Excelsis”, which means Glory in the highest.
Columbus’ second voyage was accompanied by 12 priests and endorsed with the authority of King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella to give spiritual attention to the natives. Many voyages occurred and all of them included the papal authority to take these countries in the name of the church.
There were many reasons to discover the new world including wealth, greed and enterprise but studies indicate that the chief ambition was to honor God.
Back in Europe this was a great time of tyranny and oppression and the people were becoming increasingly agitated, in addition to, John Huss and the spread of Wyclifs English Bible that were all noted to be the main attributes of the reformation.
John Huss with his leadership was considered the ‘prophet of the nations” and his presence threatened the crown. He considered the Reformation to be “much more than an emancipation of the mind but a political national and international revolution.”
The divine right of Kings was being replaced by Constitutional government. Reformers proclaimed that “there shall be no distinction between spiritual and secular laws among Christians in that they were not to have two consciences, one for the state and one for the church.
The king of Spain said “the conversion of the Indians is the principle foundation if this conquest.”
With the Spanish in the South and the Pacific, The French along St. Lawrence, Mississippi and in Montreal, it wasn’t until the defeat of Montcalm and the fall of Quebec that opened the door to the American republic where personal and civil liberty and individual freedom began to take root.
The Virginia colony was the first English colony established by Protestants in North America and promoted by religion.
The first charter of the Virginia colony was “to provide that the true word and service of God be preached, planted and used not only for the colony but among the savages.”
“The colony under providence of Almighty God might tend to the glory of his Divine majesty in propagating the Christian religion.’
The first building erected was built for worship and the first law was “to aid the colonists in keeping of good conscience.”
In 1619 the church was established by law, yearly salaries were established for clergy that were paid for by all males 16 years and older. In 1624 every plantation had to provide a house or room for public worship.
Plymouth colony was established 13 years after Jamestown and was created to “practice a positive part of church reformation and propagate the gospel in America.”
The Mayflower reaches and anchors off Cape Cod and the colonists create the Mayflower compact organizing a “civil body politic”
It reads, in summation:
“In the name of God Amen. By the grace of God our countries have undertaken for the glory of God and the advancement of the Christian faith. To enact, constitute and frame such just and equal laws, ordinances, acts, constitutions and offices unto which we promise all due submission and obedience.”
(Nov. 11,1620)
Massachusetts bay, John Winthorp, governor “I submit and dedicate myself to God’s will and yours.”
Hartford, Connecticut, settled in 1623, according to Dr. Baird “carried the ark of the Lord with them and made religion the basis of their institutions including civil government that all would be ordered by the rules scriptures held forth.”
Maryland, Lord Baltimore, Roman Catholic, “ No persecution within the province professing the belief in Jesus Christ shall be troubled, molested or discounted for their religion or “ free exercise thereof”
Frederick Maurice stated “Colonies are sect commonwealths connected by religious convictions and persecutions; to their religion they owed their best qualities.”
John Milton, teacher and poet “The Bible doth more clearly teach the solid rules of civil government.”
William Penn “God in Christ has placed a principle in every man and infirm him of his duty and enable him to do it”
Religion led them to abandon their country rather than submit to tyranny and coming to this continent they were hoping for two things:
the enlargement of Christ’s’ kingdom by conversion of the heathen tribes and the founding of an empire for their children in which their religion could prevail.”
The continual study of the American commonwealth is a continual affirmation of Gods divine hand in the creation of this continent. These colonists believed that the Bible was everything from religious principles, the basis for law and government and all matters of common life.
This being further proof that we are a nation founded on religious Christian principles, and confirms the Christian character of the early colonists.
Did the Supreme court get it wrong?
Was the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the “Separation of church and state” as the founders intended? Was there, in fact, a separation and is it important?
The first of the Bill of Rights states:
“Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of a religion or prohibit the free exercise thereof or abridging the freedom of speech…”
Before the pilgrims came to America, the King of England imposed oppressive tyranny on Great Britain with a State controlled church that became increasingly unfavorable with it’s citizens.
Puritan “separatists” fled the Kings rule and boarded the Mayflower in search of the New World, specifically, to further Christianity and their freedom to worship their religion without persecution.
Finally reaching land, they began to build, more came and 13 colonies were established in that each colony had their own religion.
After continual growth, the nation was formed uniting these colonies where the Declaration and Bill of rights was established to guarantee the rights of men that were believed to have been given to them by God. The unification of these states into a nation was not without difficulties, one of which is a great source of contention today, after all what the pilgrims had left was still fresh in their memory.
Evidence of this memory was a letter written on November 7, 1801 to Jefferson by Nehemiah Dodge and the Danbury Baptist church concerned that with the establishment of a nation a national church would also be established.
Thomas Jefferson replies to this letter on January 1, 1802 stating that he had no intention on the creation of a national church and that he would provide “A wall of separation” in that the government would not interfere with the affairs of the church. This letter was the first and only personal letter written by a president used to create such a ruling.
Our historical documentation including quotes provides ample support of this claim.
Congressional records from June through September 1789 make it clear they wanted to follow God’s principles but not allow one denomination to run the nation.
In 1799, the Supreme Court declared:
“By our form of government, the Christian religion is the established religion; and all sects and denominations are placed on the same and equal footing.”
George Washington said:
“If anyone attempted to separate religion and morality from politics they couldn’t be called a Patriot.”
John Dickerson, signer of the Constitution (1732-1808):
“To my creator, I resign myself humbly, confiding in the goodness and His mercy through Jesus Christ for the events of eternity.”
Samuel Adams, signer of the Declaration (1722-1803)
“First of all, I rely upon the merits of Jesus Christ for the pardon of all my sins.”
Gabriel Duvall, U.S. Supreme court justice
“I resign my soul into the hands of the Almighty who gave it in humble hopes of His mercy through our Savior Jesus Christ.”
Many quotes were dated both before and after Jefferson’s letter by men like Patrick Henry, US Supreme court chief justice John Jay, Robert Payne, Ben Franklin, John Quincy Adams, Gunning Bedford, Benjamin Rush and many others that beg the question about this separation.
These quotes and others also speak the importance of religion in a child’s education. The New England Primer was the primary educational source that confirms this.
If the Supreme courts’ job is to properly interpret the Constitution, should they not have had an understanding of the history surrounding these documents knowing that these interpretations could alter the course of history?
One misinterpretation of “freedom of religion” was that people had the freedom to worship any religion including religions other than Christianity, this was simply not true.
The 13 colonies were united in their belief in God, as Christians and differed only in the doctrinal issues. The “freedom of religion” was to allow these individual colonies once they became a nation to continue their freedom to worship without concern of a state church like they left in Europe.
Our founders understood the fragile nature of these guaranteed freedoms and knew the dangerous effects of Multiculturalism.
Ben Franklin said:
“No nation has ever withstood the dangers of Multiculturalism.”
Benjamin Rush stated:
“ If the practice of virtue gives way to moral and cultural relativism, as Multiculturalism espouses, America will lose their republic, freedom and blessings their once promised land bestowed.”
How is it that our founders continually gave thanks and acknowledgement to God and today we not only deny they did but believe instead that the church must be separated from the state and all evidence of God needs to be removed from society, was it so that we would not offend others?
Aristotle quoted:
“Tolerance was the last virtue of a dying society.”
As this nation grew it is important to understand that those who came here assimilated into American culture rather than filing lawsuits and try to change our laws and traditions because they were offended. Let’s see how well it has worked so far.
Since 1962, prayer, the Bible, the Ten Commandments, crosses and other symbols and traditions have been terminated and removed and deemed unlawful. The moral decline since that time is directly proportional to the continual denial of God in society.
Divorce, pornography, corruption, lawsuits, decline of family, homelessness, violent and non-violent crimes in both adults and children, an increase in laws, jail facilities, lack of common sense and personal accountability just to name a few.
The proof of our religious influence is inconsistent with the courts interpretation and needs to be challenged.Examples include but are not limited to:
10 Commandments in Archives building in D.C.
Moses, 10 Commandments and 12 apostles on front entrance of Supreme court
Republican form of government
National motto and currency
Daily congressional opening prayer
Holidays, including Sundays
Swearing under oath
Pledge of allegiance
Founding documents and quotes
Acknowledgement of Supreme court in 1799
Biblical inscription on government Buildings
Inscriptions on walls in Universities
Foundation of Universities
DC visitors bureau
These examples are only some of the many pieces of evidence that allows me to believe that the Supreme court either has little knowledge of our history or they are sworn to uphold and support an entirely different agenda.
It is our own apathy and ignorance of history that has brought us to where we, those who have sworn to protect and uphold the Constitution have come to think we know and protect something that we really know nothing about.
Ben Franklin said:
“A country that knows not where it has been knows not where it is going.”
If the foundations be destroyed what can the righteous do?
The first of the Bill of Rights states:
“Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of a religion or prohibit the free exercise thereof or abridging the freedom of speech…”
Before the pilgrims came to America, the King of England imposed oppressive tyranny on Great Britain with a State controlled church that became increasingly unfavorable with it’s citizens.
Puritan “separatists” fled the Kings rule and boarded the Mayflower in search of the New World, specifically, to further Christianity and their freedom to worship their religion without persecution.
Finally reaching land, they began to build, more came and 13 colonies were established in that each colony had their own religion.
After continual growth, the nation was formed uniting these colonies where the Declaration and Bill of rights was established to guarantee the rights of men that were believed to have been given to them by God. The unification of these states into a nation was not without difficulties, one of which is a great source of contention today, after all what the pilgrims had left was still fresh in their memory.
Evidence of this memory was a letter written on November 7, 1801 to Jefferson by Nehemiah Dodge and the Danbury Baptist church concerned that with the establishment of a nation a national church would also be established.
Thomas Jefferson replies to this letter on January 1, 1802 stating that he had no intention on the creation of a national church and that he would provide “A wall of separation” in that the government would not interfere with the affairs of the church. This letter was the first and only personal letter written by a president used to create such a ruling.
Our historical documentation including quotes provides ample support of this claim.
Congressional records from June through September 1789 make it clear they wanted to follow God’s principles but not allow one denomination to run the nation.
In 1799, the Supreme Court declared:
“By our form of government, the Christian religion is the established religion; and all sects and denominations are placed on the same and equal footing.”
George Washington said:
“If anyone attempted to separate religion and morality from politics they couldn’t be called a Patriot.”
John Dickerson, signer of the Constitution (1732-1808):
“To my creator, I resign myself humbly, confiding in the goodness and His mercy through Jesus Christ for the events of eternity.”
Samuel Adams, signer of the Declaration (1722-1803)
“First of all, I rely upon the merits of Jesus Christ for the pardon of all my sins.”
Gabriel Duvall, U.S. Supreme court justice
“I resign my soul into the hands of the Almighty who gave it in humble hopes of His mercy through our Savior Jesus Christ.”
Many quotes were dated both before and after Jefferson’s letter by men like Patrick Henry, US Supreme court chief justice John Jay, Robert Payne, Ben Franklin, John Quincy Adams, Gunning Bedford, Benjamin Rush and many others that beg the question about this separation.
These quotes and others also speak the importance of religion in a child’s education. The New England Primer was the primary educational source that confirms this.
If the Supreme courts’ job is to properly interpret the Constitution, should they not have had an understanding of the history surrounding these documents knowing that these interpretations could alter the course of history?
One misinterpretation of “freedom of religion” was that people had the freedom to worship any religion including religions other than Christianity, this was simply not true.
The 13 colonies were united in their belief in God, as Christians and differed only in the doctrinal issues. The “freedom of religion” was to allow these individual colonies once they became a nation to continue their freedom to worship without concern of a state church like they left in Europe.
Our founders understood the fragile nature of these guaranteed freedoms and knew the dangerous effects of Multiculturalism.
Ben Franklin said:
“No nation has ever withstood the dangers of Multiculturalism.”
Benjamin Rush stated:
“ If the practice of virtue gives way to moral and cultural relativism, as Multiculturalism espouses, America will lose their republic, freedom and blessings their once promised land bestowed.”
How is it that our founders continually gave thanks and acknowledgement to God and today we not only deny they did but believe instead that the church must be separated from the state and all evidence of God needs to be removed from society, was it so that we would not offend others?
Aristotle quoted:
“Tolerance was the last virtue of a dying society.”
As this nation grew it is important to understand that those who came here assimilated into American culture rather than filing lawsuits and try to change our laws and traditions because they were offended. Let’s see how well it has worked so far.
Since 1962, prayer, the Bible, the Ten Commandments, crosses and other symbols and traditions have been terminated and removed and deemed unlawful. The moral decline since that time is directly proportional to the continual denial of God in society.
Divorce, pornography, corruption, lawsuits, decline of family, homelessness, violent and non-violent crimes in both adults and children, an increase in laws, jail facilities, lack of common sense and personal accountability just to name a few.
The proof of our religious influence is inconsistent with the courts interpretation and needs to be challenged.Examples include but are not limited to:
10 Commandments in Archives building in D.C.
Moses, 10 Commandments and 12 apostles on front entrance of Supreme court
Republican form of government
National motto and currency
Daily congressional opening prayer
Holidays, including Sundays
Swearing under oath
Pledge of allegiance
Founding documents and quotes
Acknowledgement of Supreme court in 1799
Biblical inscription on government Buildings
Inscriptions on walls in Universities
Foundation of Universities
DC visitors bureau
These examples are only some of the many pieces of evidence that allows me to believe that the Supreme court either has little knowledge of our history or they are sworn to uphold and support an entirely different agenda.
It is our own apathy and ignorance of history that has brought us to where we, those who have sworn to protect and uphold the Constitution have come to think we know and protect something that we really know nothing about.
Ben Franklin said:
“A country that knows not where it has been knows not where it is going.”
If the foundations be destroyed what can the righteous do?
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
AMERICA: UNDER THE INFLUENCE
Have “We the people” in America lost our minds? Have we become a nation under the influence of something so powerful that it has made us lose all rationale, all common sense? Do we still have respect for the sacrifices that have been made for our freedoms and for our Constitution? Did you know that we are farther from a free country than we have ever been?
Before I begin giving examples of irrational behavior maybe it is a good time to list some of the 10 planks of the Communist manifesto. Is it possible that this country got where it is by accident or is this all part of a plan to destroy the last free country in the world? Maybe after reading them we will be able to see our direction a bit more clearly.
These planks were written as the steps to destroy free enterprise and initiate the ultimate in a socialist state.
Abolition of private property, heavy graduated income tax, abolish rights to inheritance, centralize the banks, equal liability for labor, take over auto industry, unions, education, media and to ultimately gain full control over the citizens of which are governed in addition to doing away with loyalty oaths and symbols of our nations sovereignty and anything that lifts us above other nations, after all we are all to be equal.
Have we become sheep just following others, doing what we are told trusting the government like lambs to the slaughter?
Ever wonder why people voluntarily accept vaccinations without ever questioning how they are made, if they are safe and if they have been tested? Is it because we trust that the government is looking out for our best interest? Why are they pushing so hard and so adamant about forcing it on the people even before it was even tested. Is this Constitutional?
More examples of other odd behaviors are:
Our schools are beginning to teach our children sex education beginning in kindergarten, does it teach them to be promiscuous at an earlier age? Our schools teach children to accept homosexuality as an acceptable alternative lifestyle. Do we focus on the importance of the heterosexual lifestyle in public school or should this be left to be taught at home? Is this indoctrination or education?
In the last few weeks there were several instances where students were effected by the zero tolerance weapons ban at school.
One school district considered suspending a six year old student and considered sending him to reform school for having a eating utensil used for camping at his elementary school claiming that there was a zero tolerance for weapons.
The other incident was a high school student that was suspended for having a pocket knife in the glove compartment of his car. They considered not only suspending him but wanted to consider suspending his future plans to attend WestPoint the following year.
Why have public schools forced and adhered to zero tolerance rules while also forcing our children to be tolerant of other issues at the same time, is this consistent? Why does the government feel they have the elevated control over the parent to teach the children what they feel is right without consideration of the parents? What gives the schools or the president of the United States the authority to impose their agenda upon our children when they know that there are a great many that disagree with this administrations policies.
Our public schools across the country that are forced to separate the church from the state but find it acceptable to sing praises to Obama that “He will save us?” using church hymns?
Isn’t it strange that our current president with all of the problems our nation faces still has time to expand his reach, campaign for other candidates, make appearances on late night television, make daily appearances on mainstream news media, with the exception of Fox, become a lobbyist for his own programs, push them, sell them, repackage them and still have time to save the world? Does anyone realize the fact that we expect the president to fix our economy is a violation of the Constitution and by expecting him to do so has willingly given him unconstitutional control?
Why do you suppose we believe that the government can take better care of us that we can as individuals?
Did you know that our congress plans to pass and shove their legislation down our throats using scare tactics not even bothering to read the bill they are supporting even if we don’t like it, is there reasoning because we just don’t understand it or knowing there are some of us who will vote for it without even knowing what it says.
Do we understand that the government itself has no money and that “Tax dollars” is money that the government receives from the money we pay to the government in the form of taxes? Do we understand that allowing the government to expand in size, power and control will erode the freedoms of the citizens returning us to the bondage and tyranny we fled from just before America was established? Still no one questions the unconstitutional nature of such government overreach?
Why does congress believe we should apologize to other countries for our behavior, to make friends with our enemies? Do they believe that they would not have been our enemies if they had been better understood? Should we really grant known terrorists rights, amnesty and healthcare at the expense of those they tried to kill? Are we to understand that violent religions are peaceful even if the evidence is to the contrary?
It is hard to understand the Constitutionality of the 30 presidential appointed czars that somehow are immune to any congressional approval ultimately left only to answer to the president? As a man who has sworn to defend and uphold the Constitution of the United States why do all of his appointees have ties to communism and whom give great reverence to dictators like Mao Tsedong, Saul Aulinski, Karl Marx and others?
Why is it so important that this administration passes this healthcare overhaul, why does it have to have a public option and why does it have to be government run?
Has anyone noticed that the legislation passed by this administration has been pro-government and all been passed by force using scare tactics? Our government has taken over the media, the banking industry, the auto industry, real estate, healthcare, food industry and the economy as a whole. They have printed money, created tremendous debt through bailouts, stimulus packages and other programs including the clunkers program without listening to their constituents?
Do we really believe that the stimulus, bailouts, clunkers have helped? We are told that the lack of immigration reform and open borders, cap and trade disarming the military and compromising national security will make us stronger?
We are told that our economy is improving regardless of the 500k jobs lost every month and watching the stock market go up- He told us not to watch the DJIA when it was down because it was not an accurate account of what is happening but now that it is up it is ok?
How can the DJIA be going up with continual decline in the economy, is it being manipulated before a major collapse?
We are told that our economy is improving because of the GDP numbers increase of 3.5 % but have we forgotten why this happened? Was it not from the temporary government program meant to generate the economy and since the programs termination will bring the same dismal numbers as before the programs inception? Somehow they left out the fact that the clunkers program left each taxpayer with a bill of about 5000.00 for the program-Who will pay this debt?
It has been said that if we continue to go in this direction that our economy will continue to recover, can someone tell me how this is possible and how we can avoid what I believe to be a future of chaos, civil unrest due to the socio-economic collapse that appears inevitable and what will fail in comparison to the last revolution?
Isn’t it interesting that within our first amendment of the bill of rights that the government has managed to separate the church from the state and regulate the redress of grievances but somehow has failed to restrain the freedom of the press? How many ways are their to interpret the right to bear arms shall not be infringed?
Is the government telling us that they know what is better for us than we do, resembling the entitlement , nanny state?
I am intrigued by the ability of this administration to change the definitions of words and their intentions to deceive people into going along with their agenda if it is not accepted the first time?
When people rose up about the taxation they told us that paying taxes was our patriotic duty, when they began the acquisition of the banks, the auto industry, healthcare they said that spreading the wealth wasn’t socialism. They say people in opposition to their agenda were right wing extremists and should be labeled as domestic terrorists but the middle eastern terrorists should be given benefits at the expense of those who have been labeled as such?
Can they continue to pass agendas just by changing the name to something more appealing?
Can we spend our way into prosperity as our government leads us by example? How would that work for my family?
Can we really pass a 1.3 trillion dollar healthcare overhaul without incurring a tax burden on the citizens as promised, how does that work when the nation debt is a direct reflection of the burden tax payers will have to pay?
We are told that global warming is a fact and that we are in danger of passing a point of no return, why was it the name changed from global warming to climate change now stating that cooling is also a result of the global warming. Do we really believe this?
Over 50 years have passed where we have somehow become comfortable believing that abortion is a choice, calling it women’s health, while avoiding the fact that it is a termination of an innocent life? Why is it that we punish those who commit murder but not those who terminate lives for a living, is there a difference simply because the government says there is? We call the murder of 5-15 people a massacre but somehow forget about the 50 million babies whom have had their lives terminated for the sake of convenience, as a choice?
Why are murderers not given their right to choose whether someone lives or dies and why are they punished, are we not being tolerant of others?
How is it we can call it education when we indoctrinate our children with propaganda about evolution without creation, to promote global warming and its dire consequences without facts, that we can sing praises to our president as though he is the messiah, that homosexuality is an acceptable lifestyle giving them special rights, that this countries history deserves to be re-written because it offends others, That our flag is now some kind of disgrace?
Have we bothered to teach that neither evolution or creation is a fact, that the world may or may not be billions of years old because carbon dating has been proven false in 1973, that Atheism and Humanism were both acknowledged as religions by the supreme court, that homosexuality violates every law known to man including civil, natural and biblical law?
Why do we deny our Christian heritage regardless of the evidence to the contrary, do we believe that our government has not committed numerous Constitutional violations and that paying taxes is patriotic, while those opposing the government is an act of terrorism?
My children this past year have been made to believe that our founding fathers were homosexuals, that regardless of your religion evolution is a fact, that Obama will save us, that this country was not founded on Christian principles and that it is illegal to link Christianity with the history of this country.
Why do we believe we can do socialism better than any other country in history aside from the fact that it has failed to accomplish what the governments said it would accomplish and only ended up in hardships for the citizens it was supposed to help and only advantageous to the government who imposed it.
Have we become so stupid as a country that we believe that when something bad happens that we need to create laws to prevent it from happening again and when it does we question why?
The evidence concludes that as time goes on we have become more imperfect, more uncivil and more disrespectful contrary to the views of non-believers that believe we are reaching perfection.
We have become a people who are accustomed to going after brush fires without going to the source of what starts them. We have become so focused on all of the little things but have somehow failed to understand and attack these issues at the source where these little fires begin.
Do you know that we have a state law that states that automobiles must stop at crosswalks to prevent hitting our children and other citizens?
Do you realize we just bombed the moon in search for water? Has anyone thought of the significance of the moon and its importance to life on Earth?
Are we nuts?
We have government funded organizations like:
Battered womens council
Childhelp usa
MADD
National center for missing and exploited children
National center for victims of crimes
Crime prevention council
Domestic violence hotline
Fraud hotline
Parents of murdered children
Sexual violence resource center
Rape, abuse and incest network and others
If we are truly a nation who cares for eachother and others around the world how would you explain that to another country if these were on our resume?
60 years ago God began being removed from society, from politics and public school, we have become a nation of increased government, corruption and the intense desire to create laws. Are these laws and increase in government to replace our own individual common sense or do we no longer have any.
We are truly a nation who is under the influence. Is our nation truly better of without God, the evidence is there for you to decide.
The bible says, A country or government that does not serve me shall perish.
Isaiah 60:12
Before I begin giving examples of irrational behavior maybe it is a good time to list some of the 10 planks of the Communist manifesto. Is it possible that this country got where it is by accident or is this all part of a plan to destroy the last free country in the world? Maybe after reading them we will be able to see our direction a bit more clearly.
These planks were written as the steps to destroy free enterprise and initiate the ultimate in a socialist state.
Abolition of private property, heavy graduated income tax, abolish rights to inheritance, centralize the banks, equal liability for labor, take over auto industry, unions, education, media and to ultimately gain full control over the citizens of which are governed in addition to doing away with loyalty oaths and symbols of our nations sovereignty and anything that lifts us above other nations, after all we are all to be equal.
Have we become sheep just following others, doing what we are told trusting the government like lambs to the slaughter?
Ever wonder why people voluntarily accept vaccinations without ever questioning how they are made, if they are safe and if they have been tested? Is it because we trust that the government is looking out for our best interest? Why are they pushing so hard and so adamant about forcing it on the people even before it was even tested. Is this Constitutional?
More examples of other odd behaviors are:
Our schools are beginning to teach our children sex education beginning in kindergarten, does it teach them to be promiscuous at an earlier age? Our schools teach children to accept homosexuality as an acceptable alternative lifestyle. Do we focus on the importance of the heterosexual lifestyle in public school or should this be left to be taught at home? Is this indoctrination or education?
In the last few weeks there were several instances where students were effected by the zero tolerance weapons ban at school.
One school district considered suspending a six year old student and considered sending him to reform school for having a eating utensil used for camping at his elementary school claiming that there was a zero tolerance for weapons.
The other incident was a high school student that was suspended for having a pocket knife in the glove compartment of his car. They considered not only suspending him but wanted to consider suspending his future plans to attend WestPoint the following year.
Why have public schools forced and adhered to zero tolerance rules while also forcing our children to be tolerant of other issues at the same time, is this consistent? Why does the government feel they have the elevated control over the parent to teach the children what they feel is right without consideration of the parents? What gives the schools or the president of the United States the authority to impose their agenda upon our children when they know that there are a great many that disagree with this administrations policies.
Our public schools across the country that are forced to separate the church from the state but find it acceptable to sing praises to Obama that “He will save us?” using church hymns?
Isn’t it strange that our current president with all of the problems our nation faces still has time to expand his reach, campaign for other candidates, make appearances on late night television, make daily appearances on mainstream news media, with the exception of Fox, become a lobbyist for his own programs, push them, sell them, repackage them and still have time to save the world? Does anyone realize the fact that we expect the president to fix our economy is a violation of the Constitution and by expecting him to do so has willingly given him unconstitutional control?
Why do you suppose we believe that the government can take better care of us that we can as individuals?
Did you know that our congress plans to pass and shove their legislation down our throats using scare tactics not even bothering to read the bill they are supporting even if we don’t like it, is there reasoning because we just don’t understand it or knowing there are some of us who will vote for it without even knowing what it says.
Do we understand that the government itself has no money and that “Tax dollars” is money that the government receives from the money we pay to the government in the form of taxes? Do we understand that allowing the government to expand in size, power and control will erode the freedoms of the citizens returning us to the bondage and tyranny we fled from just before America was established? Still no one questions the unconstitutional nature of such government overreach?
Why does congress believe we should apologize to other countries for our behavior, to make friends with our enemies? Do they believe that they would not have been our enemies if they had been better understood? Should we really grant known terrorists rights, amnesty and healthcare at the expense of those they tried to kill? Are we to understand that violent religions are peaceful even if the evidence is to the contrary?
It is hard to understand the Constitutionality of the 30 presidential appointed czars that somehow are immune to any congressional approval ultimately left only to answer to the president? As a man who has sworn to defend and uphold the Constitution of the United States why do all of his appointees have ties to communism and whom give great reverence to dictators like Mao Tsedong, Saul Aulinski, Karl Marx and others?
Why is it so important that this administration passes this healthcare overhaul, why does it have to have a public option and why does it have to be government run?
Has anyone noticed that the legislation passed by this administration has been pro-government and all been passed by force using scare tactics? Our government has taken over the media, the banking industry, the auto industry, real estate, healthcare, food industry and the economy as a whole. They have printed money, created tremendous debt through bailouts, stimulus packages and other programs including the clunkers program without listening to their constituents?
Do we really believe that the stimulus, bailouts, clunkers have helped? We are told that the lack of immigration reform and open borders, cap and trade disarming the military and compromising national security will make us stronger?
We are told that our economy is improving regardless of the 500k jobs lost every month and watching the stock market go up- He told us not to watch the DJIA when it was down because it was not an accurate account of what is happening but now that it is up it is ok?
How can the DJIA be going up with continual decline in the economy, is it being manipulated before a major collapse?
We are told that our economy is improving because of the GDP numbers increase of 3.5 % but have we forgotten why this happened? Was it not from the temporary government program meant to generate the economy and since the programs termination will bring the same dismal numbers as before the programs inception? Somehow they left out the fact that the clunkers program left each taxpayer with a bill of about 5000.00 for the program-Who will pay this debt?
It has been said that if we continue to go in this direction that our economy will continue to recover, can someone tell me how this is possible and how we can avoid what I believe to be a future of chaos, civil unrest due to the socio-economic collapse that appears inevitable and what will fail in comparison to the last revolution?
Isn’t it interesting that within our first amendment of the bill of rights that the government has managed to separate the church from the state and regulate the redress of grievances but somehow has failed to restrain the freedom of the press? How many ways are their to interpret the right to bear arms shall not be infringed?
Is the government telling us that they know what is better for us than we do, resembling the entitlement , nanny state?
I am intrigued by the ability of this administration to change the definitions of words and their intentions to deceive people into going along with their agenda if it is not accepted the first time?
When people rose up about the taxation they told us that paying taxes was our patriotic duty, when they began the acquisition of the banks, the auto industry, healthcare they said that spreading the wealth wasn’t socialism. They say people in opposition to their agenda were right wing extremists and should be labeled as domestic terrorists but the middle eastern terrorists should be given benefits at the expense of those who have been labeled as such?
Can they continue to pass agendas just by changing the name to something more appealing?
Can we spend our way into prosperity as our government leads us by example? How would that work for my family?
Can we really pass a 1.3 trillion dollar healthcare overhaul without incurring a tax burden on the citizens as promised, how does that work when the nation debt is a direct reflection of the burden tax payers will have to pay?
We are told that global warming is a fact and that we are in danger of passing a point of no return, why was it the name changed from global warming to climate change now stating that cooling is also a result of the global warming. Do we really believe this?
Over 50 years have passed where we have somehow become comfortable believing that abortion is a choice, calling it women’s health, while avoiding the fact that it is a termination of an innocent life? Why is it that we punish those who commit murder but not those who terminate lives for a living, is there a difference simply because the government says there is? We call the murder of 5-15 people a massacre but somehow forget about the 50 million babies whom have had their lives terminated for the sake of convenience, as a choice?
Why are murderers not given their right to choose whether someone lives or dies and why are they punished, are we not being tolerant of others?
How is it we can call it education when we indoctrinate our children with propaganda about evolution without creation, to promote global warming and its dire consequences without facts, that we can sing praises to our president as though he is the messiah, that homosexuality is an acceptable lifestyle giving them special rights, that this countries history deserves to be re-written because it offends others, That our flag is now some kind of disgrace?
Have we bothered to teach that neither evolution or creation is a fact, that the world may or may not be billions of years old because carbon dating has been proven false in 1973, that Atheism and Humanism were both acknowledged as religions by the supreme court, that homosexuality violates every law known to man including civil, natural and biblical law?
Why do we deny our Christian heritage regardless of the evidence to the contrary, do we believe that our government has not committed numerous Constitutional violations and that paying taxes is patriotic, while those opposing the government is an act of terrorism?
My children this past year have been made to believe that our founding fathers were homosexuals, that regardless of your religion evolution is a fact, that Obama will save us, that this country was not founded on Christian principles and that it is illegal to link Christianity with the history of this country.
Why do we believe we can do socialism better than any other country in history aside from the fact that it has failed to accomplish what the governments said it would accomplish and only ended up in hardships for the citizens it was supposed to help and only advantageous to the government who imposed it.
Have we become so stupid as a country that we believe that when something bad happens that we need to create laws to prevent it from happening again and when it does we question why?
The evidence concludes that as time goes on we have become more imperfect, more uncivil and more disrespectful contrary to the views of non-believers that believe we are reaching perfection.
We have become a people who are accustomed to going after brush fires without going to the source of what starts them. We have become so focused on all of the little things but have somehow failed to understand and attack these issues at the source where these little fires begin.
Do you know that we have a state law that states that automobiles must stop at crosswalks to prevent hitting our children and other citizens?
Do you realize we just bombed the moon in search for water? Has anyone thought of the significance of the moon and its importance to life on Earth?
Are we nuts?
We have government funded organizations like:
Battered womens council
Childhelp usa
MADD
National center for missing and exploited children
National center for victims of crimes
Crime prevention council
Domestic violence hotline
Fraud hotline
Parents of murdered children
Sexual violence resource center
Rape, abuse and incest network and others
If we are truly a nation who cares for eachother and others around the world how would you explain that to another country if these were on our resume?
60 years ago God began being removed from society, from politics and public school, we have become a nation of increased government, corruption and the intense desire to create laws. Are these laws and increase in government to replace our own individual common sense or do we no longer have any.
We are truly a nation who is under the influence. Is our nation truly better of without God, the evidence is there for you to decide.
The bible says, A country or government that does not serve me shall perish.
Isaiah 60:12
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
Religion in Civil Government?
RELIGION IN CIVIL GOVERNMENT
Have religions played a role in governments in history or did they believe in the separation of church and state America does? What do you suppose the effects were or would be regarding government of these cultures?
Sometimes the best and most accurate way to understand any perspective would be to read the quotes of philosophers in the age in which they lived to understand their history.
Quotes like:
“It is not personal but civil righteousness with which we are immediately concerned; not religion as it achieves salvation of the soul but religion as it exalts a nation.”
“Governments and civilizations of all people are typed and determined by the character of their religions whether the religion is true or false. The mightiest thing in a nation’s heart is its religion.”
“Men’s thinking in the political field is in great part to his convictions related to his spiritual field.”
Rousseau quoted: “Never was a state founded that didn’t have a religion for its basis.”
“All civil institutions of the ancient world were the outgrowth of religious beliefs. Nations were governed as gods directed, kings ruled, judges gave opinions, soldiers fought, generals planned and all gave great reverence to their deity.”
The Roman Empire whether pagan or Christian from Romulus to Charlemagne never thought to rule without seeking guidance from their divinity. Both heathen and Christians have regarded religion as the basis of their commonwealth as a soul condition of national existence.
Plutarch, Plato’s most diligent disciple stated: “There was never a state created by Atheists- You will never find a city without God and prayer at its foundation.”
Napoleon quoted: “Religion as a national force is a mystery of social order- One can’t govern without it otherwise the dignity and independence of a nation are disturbed at every moment.”
Lord Erskine, England’s greatest constitutional attorney when speaking of the Christian religion said: “Depend upon it, the world could not be held together without it.”
Men such as Plato, Plutarch, Napoleon, Rousseau, Kishub Chunder and many others acknowledged the fact that without Christianity as the cornerstone of civil government there would be a lack of morality, social order and corruption at every level.
They understood that Christianity was not only to save men but man, not teaching so much about how to die, but how to live as members of society. Did our elected officials in early America understand the importance of religion in government and the reverence they had for God to bless and protect this new nation, proof can be found in the establishment of every state constitution in America for example:
“Georgia 1777: We the people of Georgia relying on the protection and guidance of Almighty God do ordain and establish this constitution.”
They believed that banishing the bible from the land would allow people to loose their minds causing the experiment in self government to be a failure. Knowing political atheism would produce political anarchy in addition to a nation without a conscience, that it will know no rule of right but only by might and that it would pervert the law into license and make authority and cruel tyranny synonymous.
The destruction of religion would be the destruction of morality and the ruin of the state. These men understood that civil government required support from religious liberty and will not prosper without it, citing that ‘they would be no different than brute beasts.”
“Civil governments and their administrations differ as religions differ.”
It can be said that all governments of all non-Christian countries are despotic and without spiritual liberty there can be no civil freedom.
Some great examples are the “reign of terror.” It was considered one of the bloodiest chapters in France’s history with its continual revolutions just after the National assembly past a resolution declaring that “There was no God.”
In other countries, the despotisms of the East are not accidents but legitimate results of the Koran, The persecutions of Christians by Nero in Rome were despotic until the church triumphed over the state and freedom began to be re-established. Japan, China, and India are the social and political expressions of their religions, molding thought, legislation and public policies. The Koran has a monarchy and a corrupt oligarchy which are a despotic combination where the ruling of the country is in the interest of only a few people.
Regardless of any religion the story is much the same, heartless tyranny, suffering slaves fetishes, idolatries, and oppressive traditions none that offer the individual liberty of Christianity.
It was quoted that “If political freedom is desired it is important to look to the states like Holland, England and Scotland, for they are the ones who have known and believed in the Christian religion as the cornerstone of their governments and the prosperity and blessings that come from the faith in Jesus Christ.”
“The social and political force of any religion is measured by the strength of the family and the rights of the individual.” That every religion must be measured by the man it produces…As is man so is his religion and is his religion so is the nation.”
Lets look at some examples:
BUDDHISM:
Paralyses personality by preaching annihilation.
To know misery and to escape
Demands reduction in powers of affection and
To achieve “the ultimate state of non-existence.”
Their mantra:
“Know that, whatever thou has been, tis something better not to be.”
CONFUCIANISM:
Creates impoverished personality
Stating that religion is a reflection, it
Opposes progress
Teaches nothing regarding mans relation to God.
Lifeless, spiritless,
Nothing to develop virtues
No stimulation or aspiration to satisfy spiritual hunger.
China’s combination of Confucianism and Buddhism, have been responsible for it’s changeless past, sitting by by the grave, emulating the dead and dwelling among the tombs.
Their mantra:
“There is no future but the past.”
HINDUISM:
Degrades personality
Suppressing development of individual character,
Brutalizing conscience
Destroys moral distinctions
No sympathy or compassion
Hardening the heart
Intensifying selfishness
Hindu’s also have no social unity or national sentiment.
They believe that people cannot rise higher than the conceptions of the gods they worship.
For example, what would it be like to never rise higher than:
VISHNU: Who has four arms, who is half bird, half man and part serpent
or
SIVA: Monster with three eyes, riding naked on a bull wearing a necklace of skulls.
ISLAM:
Enslaves personality
Demands intellectual slavery
Domestic slavery with harems
The state enforces religious and civil slavery
No individual rights
The Koran offers a premium for war, the highest rewards for killing the most infidels.
“The end justifies the means”allowing deception, lying, persecution. The commerce suffers and the harvests cease as the famines become more prevalent. This is considered the largest religion of intolerance and persecution of others who are not in line with Islam.
CHRISTIANITY:
Promotes individual liberty, dignity and unalienable rights
Every human soul has intrinsic value
Cries advance and to move forward acknowledging His love for us and our love for others.
The doctrine that the state must guarantee the protection of life, along with the dignity, moral worth, national and individual conscience and the concept of international law are all Christian concepts unlike that of kings and priests who believe they owned the people our culture lives on the premise of the universal brotherhood.
Plato said: “A religion that fails to purify the home is powerless to elevate a nation.’
Wendell Phillips quoted: “The answer to Shasters is India, the answer to the Koran is Turkey, the answer to the Bible is the Christian civilization of Europe and America, Romanism to Spain and Mexico and Atheism to the “reign of terror” in France, the “Commune in Paris” and the moral decline of any nation of which has become tolerant of the establishments of it’s principles.
When one views the history and cultures of other nations, can our American Christian heritage and it’s influence in civil government really be denied?
The nation and the kingdom that will not serve thee shall perish.
Isaiah 60:12
Have religions played a role in governments in history or did they believe in the separation of church and state America does? What do you suppose the effects were or would be regarding government of these cultures?
Sometimes the best and most accurate way to understand any perspective would be to read the quotes of philosophers in the age in which they lived to understand their history.
Quotes like:
“It is not personal but civil righteousness with which we are immediately concerned; not religion as it achieves salvation of the soul but religion as it exalts a nation.”
“Governments and civilizations of all people are typed and determined by the character of their religions whether the religion is true or false. The mightiest thing in a nation’s heart is its religion.”
“Men’s thinking in the political field is in great part to his convictions related to his spiritual field.”
Rousseau quoted: “Never was a state founded that didn’t have a religion for its basis.”
“All civil institutions of the ancient world were the outgrowth of religious beliefs. Nations were governed as gods directed, kings ruled, judges gave opinions, soldiers fought, generals planned and all gave great reverence to their deity.”
The Roman Empire whether pagan or Christian from Romulus to Charlemagne never thought to rule without seeking guidance from their divinity. Both heathen and Christians have regarded religion as the basis of their commonwealth as a soul condition of national existence.
Plutarch, Plato’s most diligent disciple stated: “There was never a state created by Atheists- You will never find a city without God and prayer at its foundation.”
Napoleon quoted: “Religion as a national force is a mystery of social order- One can’t govern without it otherwise the dignity and independence of a nation are disturbed at every moment.”
Lord Erskine, England’s greatest constitutional attorney when speaking of the Christian religion said: “Depend upon it, the world could not be held together without it.”
Men such as Plato, Plutarch, Napoleon, Rousseau, Kishub Chunder and many others acknowledged the fact that without Christianity as the cornerstone of civil government there would be a lack of morality, social order and corruption at every level.
They understood that Christianity was not only to save men but man, not teaching so much about how to die, but how to live as members of society. Did our elected officials in early America understand the importance of religion in government and the reverence they had for God to bless and protect this new nation, proof can be found in the establishment of every state constitution in America for example:
“Georgia 1777: We the people of Georgia relying on the protection and guidance of Almighty God do ordain and establish this constitution.”
They believed that banishing the bible from the land would allow people to loose their minds causing the experiment in self government to be a failure. Knowing political atheism would produce political anarchy in addition to a nation without a conscience, that it will know no rule of right but only by might and that it would pervert the law into license and make authority and cruel tyranny synonymous.
The destruction of religion would be the destruction of morality and the ruin of the state. These men understood that civil government required support from religious liberty and will not prosper without it, citing that ‘they would be no different than brute beasts.”
“Civil governments and their administrations differ as religions differ.”
It can be said that all governments of all non-Christian countries are despotic and without spiritual liberty there can be no civil freedom.
Some great examples are the “reign of terror.” It was considered one of the bloodiest chapters in France’s history with its continual revolutions just after the National assembly past a resolution declaring that “There was no God.”
In other countries, the despotisms of the East are not accidents but legitimate results of the Koran, The persecutions of Christians by Nero in Rome were despotic until the church triumphed over the state and freedom began to be re-established. Japan, China, and India are the social and political expressions of their religions, molding thought, legislation and public policies. The Koran has a monarchy and a corrupt oligarchy which are a despotic combination where the ruling of the country is in the interest of only a few people.
Regardless of any religion the story is much the same, heartless tyranny, suffering slaves fetishes, idolatries, and oppressive traditions none that offer the individual liberty of Christianity.
It was quoted that “If political freedom is desired it is important to look to the states like Holland, England and Scotland, for they are the ones who have known and believed in the Christian religion as the cornerstone of their governments and the prosperity and blessings that come from the faith in Jesus Christ.”
“The social and political force of any religion is measured by the strength of the family and the rights of the individual.” That every religion must be measured by the man it produces…As is man so is his religion and is his religion so is the nation.”
Lets look at some examples:
BUDDHISM:
Paralyses personality by preaching annihilation.
To know misery and to escape
Demands reduction in powers of affection and
To achieve “the ultimate state of non-existence.”
Their mantra:
“Know that, whatever thou has been, tis something better not to be.”
CONFUCIANISM:
Creates impoverished personality
Stating that religion is a reflection, it
Opposes progress
Teaches nothing regarding mans relation to God.
Lifeless, spiritless,
Nothing to develop virtues
No stimulation or aspiration to satisfy spiritual hunger.
China’s combination of Confucianism and Buddhism, have been responsible for it’s changeless past, sitting by by the grave, emulating the dead and dwelling among the tombs.
Their mantra:
“There is no future but the past.”
HINDUISM:
Degrades personality
Suppressing development of individual character,
Brutalizing conscience
Destroys moral distinctions
No sympathy or compassion
Hardening the heart
Intensifying selfishness
Hindu’s also have no social unity or national sentiment.
They believe that people cannot rise higher than the conceptions of the gods they worship.
For example, what would it be like to never rise higher than:
VISHNU: Who has four arms, who is half bird, half man and part serpent
or
SIVA: Monster with three eyes, riding naked on a bull wearing a necklace of skulls.
ISLAM:
Enslaves personality
Demands intellectual slavery
Domestic slavery with harems
The state enforces religious and civil slavery
No individual rights
The Koran offers a premium for war, the highest rewards for killing the most infidels.
“The end justifies the means”allowing deception, lying, persecution. The commerce suffers and the harvests cease as the famines become more prevalent. This is considered the largest religion of intolerance and persecution of others who are not in line with Islam.
CHRISTIANITY:
Promotes individual liberty, dignity and unalienable rights
Every human soul has intrinsic value
Cries advance and to move forward acknowledging His love for us and our love for others.
The doctrine that the state must guarantee the protection of life, along with the dignity, moral worth, national and individual conscience and the concept of international law are all Christian concepts unlike that of kings and priests who believe they owned the people our culture lives on the premise of the universal brotherhood.
Plato said: “A religion that fails to purify the home is powerless to elevate a nation.’
Wendell Phillips quoted: “The answer to Shasters is India, the answer to the Koran is Turkey, the answer to the Bible is the Christian civilization of Europe and America, Romanism to Spain and Mexico and Atheism to the “reign of terror” in France, the “Commune in Paris” and the moral decline of any nation of which has become tolerant of the establishments of it’s principles.
When one views the history and cultures of other nations, can our American Christian heritage and it’s influence in civil government really be denied?
The nation and the kingdom that will not serve thee shall perish.
Isaiah 60:12
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)